From: owner-ecto-digest To: ecto-digest@ns2.rutgers.edu Subject: ecto-digest V2 #29 Reply-To: ecto@nsmx.rutgers.edu Errors-To: owner-ecto-digest Precedence: bulk ecto-digest Wednesday, 22 February 1995 Volume 02 : Number 029 The Ecto digest is now being generated automatically. Please send problems and questions to: ecto-owner@nsmx.rutgers.edu. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Nicholas Hill Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 01:32:59 -0500 Subject: Re: Netnews: NetNews Filter Response At 1:53 pm 16/2/95 -0500, Mike Mendelson wrote: > Victoria was accompanied by a band consisting of Tim Ray (Lyle Lovett, Jane Siberry) Piano/keys, Don Heffington (Lone Justice, Emmylou Harris, Dylan etc.) drums, Byron House, (upright) bass, vocals Andrew Williams, (The Williams Brothers) guitar, keys, vocals Tammy Rogers, viola, violin, vocals > Victoria herself played acoustic and > electric guitar at various times. I didn't catch the names of the band, > but from the way they played it was clear that they must play with her > pretty regularly! Victoria seemed to be in good shape, though she did sit > down for the ocasional song, and I was delighted to hear her speaking voice > for the first time (she has the most gorgeous accent) - it explains a lot > abut how her singing voice sounds! :-) > The set-list was approximately as follows (and we missed at least one song, probably more like two or three, at the beginning): You only missed one song, Psalms from the album > > Love > Crazy Mary > (instrumental break during a technical hitch) > Harry Went to Heaven > Century Plant > ??? (I didn't recognise this one, so it's not from any of her > three albums. My notes say "Who will find", any ectophiles > got any suggestions as to what song this might have been? > She was joined onstage for this and the following song by a > guy I think was introduced as her husband Mark.) It's a new song called Hummingbird and it was written by her and her husband Mark Olson of The Jayhawks, They had not seen each other for a week or so and he showed up at the same time you did. So the first time they spoke was in song ...It was very romantic > When We Sing Together (also with Mark) > Someone to Watch Over Me (the old standard) > ??? (another unrecognised song, my notes say "Graveyard song") > ??? (and another, "Seasons" my notes say, and I seem to recall > that the lyrics featured a verse about each season) "Graveyard" is unrecorded and a few years old.. "Waterfall" is the seasons song and is my favorite song on Loose.. > You R Loved > T.C. (Victoria solo at the piano) > Tarbelly & Featherfoot > My Ally > Lights > Vieux Amis > Happy to Have Known Pappy > I Can't Cry Hard Enough > On Time (one verse only - Victoria solo a capella) > Opelousas > Summer of Drugs > Frying Pan > Sunshine Country > > The first encore consisted of: > > Moon River > Smoke Gets in Your Eyes > > For the second encore she sung a song which I did not know but which I > think she introduced as "Lorna Doone's Garden" - Mark (if I have the name right) came back for this song. Lorna Doone's Garden is another song written by Vic & Mark > > She played for the best part of three hours without a break and I was > entranced. So too were most of the audience, hardly anybody left before > the end. There were a number of people up front calling out requests all > night and it seemed that Victoria (and, more amazingly, her band) were > happy and willing to play just about anything that was asked for, even if > "On Time" was a bit abbreviated! :-) The band were terrific: in the > numbers they had obviously rehearsed best they were very tight and well > organised, but even when they must surely have been busking they seemed > very together and the range of songs they covered was quite amazing. This Band rehearsed one day in November and then did four shows together.. they had not even each other for a month... > > Martin and I had quite a struggle getting to this gig, but I'm damn glad we > persevered - it was a delightful evening. I wasn't too sure what to expect > from a Victoria Williams concert, but what we got was a superb evening's > entertainment. Go see this show! Victoria live is an uplifting and > satisfying experience. > Victoria likes to keep her band on their toes /she has never played with a set list/ does not discuss the show beforehand always surprising even herself by what happens in a show I have been working with her o these shows and she is a true inspiration... PS did anyone tape the Johnnie Walker radio show on GLR in London that Vic did ? Nicholas Hill By the way Tori was there and is a huge fan of Vics they had tea and dinner later that week ------------------------------ From: Nicholas Hill Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 02:02:27 -0500 Subject: Re: Victoria >At 1:53 pm 16/2/95 -0500, Mike Mendelson wrote: > >Martin & I went along to see Victoria at Dingwalls in Camden Lock on > February 1st. Apparently the show got a good plug in one of the Sunday > newspapers which might help to explain why it was so crowded. I >mean > Victoria is great, but who in England outside the reach of the net would >have heard of her? :-) >> Victoria was accompanied by a band consisting of > >Tim Ray (Lyle Lovett, Jane Siberry) Piano/keys, >Don Heffington (Lone Justice, Emmylou Harris, Dylan etc.) drums, >Byron House, (upright) bass, vocals >Andrew Williams, (The Williams Brothers) guitar, keys, vocals >Tammy Rogers, viola, violin, vocals > >> Victoria herself played acoustic and >> electric guitar at various times. I didn't catch the names of the band, >> but from the way they played it was clear that they must play with her >> pretty regularly! Victoria seemed to be in good shape, though she did >sit >> down for the ocasional song, and I was delighted to hear her speaking >voice >> for the first time (she has the most gorgeous accent) - it explains a lot > >> abut how her singing voice sounds! :-) >> The set-list was approximately as follows (and we missed at least one >song, > probably more like two or three, at the beginning): > You only missed one song, Psalms from the album >> >> Love >> Crazy Mary >> (instrumental break during a technical hitch) >> Harry Went to Heaven >> Century Plant >> ??? (I didn't recognise this one, so it's not from any of her > >> three albums. My notes say "Who will find", any >ectophiles >> got any suggestions as to what song this might have been? > >> She was joined onstage for this and the following song by >a >> guy I think was introduced as her husband Mark.) > It's a new song called Hummingbird and it was written by her and her husband Mark Olson of The Jayhawks, They had not seen each other for a week or so and he showed up at the same time you did. So the first time they spoke was in song ...It was very romantic >> When We Sing Together (also with Mark) >> Someone to Watch Over Me (the old standard) >> ??? (another unrecognised song, my notes say "Graveyard >song") >> ??? (and another, "Seasons" my notes say, and I seem to >recall >> that the lyrics featured a verse about each season) "Graveyard" is unrecorded and a few years old.. "Waterfall" is the seasons song and is my favorite song on Loose.. >> You R Loved >> T.C. (Victoria solo at the piano) >> Tarbelly & Featherfoot >> My Ally >> Lights >> Vieux Amis >> Happy to Have Known Pappy >> I Can't Cry Hard Enough >> On Time (one verse only - Victoria solo a capella) >> Opelousas >> Summer of Drugs >> Frying Pan >> Sunshine Country >> >> The first encore consisted of: >> >> Moon River >> Smoke Gets in Your Eyes >> >> For the second encore she sung a song which I did not know but which I >> think she introduced as "Lorna Doone's Garden" - Mark (if I have the name right) came back for this song. Lorna Doone's Garden is another song written by Vic & Mark >> She played for the best part of three hours without a break and I was >> entranced. So too were most of the audience, hardly anybody left before >> the end. There were a number of people up front calling out requests all > >> night and it seemed that Victoria (and, more amazingly, her band) were >> happy and willing to play just about anything that was asked for, even if > >> "On Time" was a bit abbreviated! :-) The band were terrific: in the >> numbers they had obviously rehearsed best they were very tight and well >> organised, but even when they must surely have been busking they seemed >> very together and the range of songs they covered was quite amazing. This Band rehearsed one day in November and then did four shows together.. they had not even each other for a month... >> Martin and I had quite a struggle getting to this gig, but I'm damn glad >we >> persevered - it was a delightful evening. I wasn't too sure what to >expect >> from a Victoria Williams concert, but what we got was a superb evening's >> entertainment. Go see this show! Victoria live is an uplifting and >> satisfying experience. >> Victoria likes to keep her band on their toes /she has never played with a set list/ does not discuss the show beforehand always surprising even herself by what happens in a show I have been working with her o these shows and she is a true inspiration... PS did anyone tape the Johnnie Walker radio show on GLR in London that Vic did ? Nicholas Hill By the way Tori was there and is a huge fan of Vics they had tea and dinner later that week PPS The new touring band will replace Byron House with Joey Byrnes(Giant Sand, and longtime Vic player and replace Tammy with David Mansfield (Dylan, Neil Young, Lucinda Everybody) ------------------------------ From: Michael Klouda Date: Tue, 21 Feb 1995 11:55:33 -0500 Subject: Re: Kind Ectophiles, please respond! On Sat, 18 Feb 1995 23:12:52 Steve VanDevender wrote: > > > Group: Two or more individuals in face to face > > > interaction, each aware of his/her membership in > > > the group, each aware of the others who belong to > > > the group, and each aware of their positive interdependence > > > as they strive to achieve mutual goals. Obviously we are not "face to face" in the literal meaning of the words, but why would that have any bearing as to if we are a group or not? What does looking at someones face add to the group, or for that matter what does having someone look at you take away from your involvement with the group. Additionally, many of us ectophiles read but don't respond, does our lack on direct involvement separate us from being part of the group? Just some brief thoughts. Michael Klouda ------------------------------ From: dkastens@titan.rz.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (Dirk Kastens) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 15:58:07 +0100 Subject: Re: Kind Michael Klouda wrote: > > > Group: Two or more individuals in face to face > > > interaction, each aware of his/her membership in > > > the group, each aware of the others who belong to > > > the group, and each aware of their positive interdependence > > > as they strive to achieve mutual goals. > Obviously we are not "face to face" in the literal meaning of the words, > but why would that have any bearing as to if we are a group or not? What > does looking at someones face add to the group, or for that matter what > does having someone look at you take away from your involvement with the > group. > > Additionally, many of us ectophiles read but don't respond, does our lack > on direct involvement separate us from being part of the group? Yes, and are we really aware of each other? There are a few hundred subscribers to ecto but I only remember few names. Reading the birthday list, I often think "who's this, I haven't read that name before". I believe that those who do not interact, those who are only reading, watching or listening, are not members of a group. If you are watching a talk show or live discussion on TV, because you're interested in the topic, you're only listening to what the others say and they are not aware of you. You don't belong to the group, you only belong to the set of anonymous watchers, and that's not a group, either. Only my 0.02 DM. - -- Dirk ______D.Kastens@rz.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE______ ------------------------------ From: jeffw@triple-i.com (Jeff Wasilko) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 07:50:00 -0800 (PST) Subject: Paula Cole live (fwd) csoricel@cc.brynmawr.edu writes: From fumbling-towards-ecstasy-request@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au Wed Feb 22 07:48:37 1995 Errors-To: fte-request@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au From: csoricel@cc.brynmawr.edu Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 10:40:48 -0500 Message-Id: <9502221540.AA27746@cc.brynmawr.edu> To: fte@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au Subject: Paula Cole live Errors-To: fte-request@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au X-Sequence: 4485 hiya! Just your friendly-neighborhood infomeister. For those of you lucky (?!?@&!) Philadelphians (and suburbanites and those willing to risking speeding tickets and those with lear jets and those with super-human powers and ....), OK! Here it is: Paula Cole will be performing a live in-store set at Rainbow Records in West Chester at 2 pm TODAY (wednesday). The address is 967 Paoli Pike in West Chester. Cheryl - -- Jeff Wasilko, Systems Rep., Information International Inc. +1 617 937 9400 (jeffw@triple-i.com, jeffw@jane.camex.com) "I'll be youah race-cah drivah..." -- Jewel "Pahrk youah race-cah in Havahad Yahd?" -- Anja [smoe] ------------------------------ From: WretchAwry Date: Wed, 22 Feb 95 11:04:12 EST Subject: Weird stuff, Maynard / Squonk Opera / + What's with all these in the digests? > ------------------------------ > > From: > Date: > Subject: [none] > > > ------------------------------ I'd seen these before, and other people have commented on them, but I never thought they had anything to do with missing posts. Now I'm wondering if other people are posting things that aren't getting through to either Ecto loose mail or Ecto Digest. I say this because I posted a long post about seeing Squonk Opera last weekend, and it didn't appear either place. I'm bummed...I don't want to write it all out again. Teach me to save a copy before I send it out. Anyway, if anyone saw this Squonk Opera post of mine, please let me know, and mail it to me if you still have it. In short, I saw Squonk Opera last Friday and Saturday night, and they were GREAT! Thanks to those who posted about them, because I only went because I saw them mentioned in Ecto. I don't even remember who posted what, so if the SO people still have their original posts, I'd love to read them again, because I can't find them in the digests. I won't say anything more in hopes that my other post will still show up, but thanks again...I really enjoyed myself. Well, I will mention one thing, and that's that ectocynchronicity was involved in more than just getting me out to see a band I'd never heard. The members of Squonk Opera know who Happy is! They were involved somehow (I didn't get the whole story) in trying to get Happy to play a concert in Pittsburgh, but the financial end fell through. Yes, Treasure *is* the best Cocteau Twins album, IMHO of course. :-) Congrats to Eddi Reader who won Best Female Solo Artist at the Brit Awards. Boo hoo that Kate didn't win, but if Kate were going to lose, Eddi's winning is the next best thing. Same thing with kd lang winning Best International Artist. Boo hoo that Tori lost, but kd's so wonderful, I'm happy she won if Tori wasn't going to. LoveEctoLoveThePostsLoveEcto !HAPPY BIRTHDAY! LoveEctoLoveThePostsLoveEcto Vickie ------------------------------ From: lpekow@etsd.ml.com ( Larne Pekowsky ) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 95 11:17:17 EST Subject: Re: Kind Clearly we're not a group, because there's no well-defined multiplication operator over ectophiles. - Larne [Hey, SOMEONE had to do the nerd joke...] ------------------------------ From: WretchAwry Date: Wed, 22 Feb 95 11:43:48 EST Subject: Strawberry Switchblade, and HELP identify! Funny thing...Bob(?) mentioned Strawberry Switchblade a while back, and though I have an LP of theirs somewhere, I couldn't find it, so I never posted. I still can't find it, but I was going through old tapes and found a show called "London Calling" from 1985. I popped it in and...!!!...there's an interview and video bits from SS! It's only about 7 minutes long, and no entire videos are shown, but there's excerpts of "Jolene" and "Since Yesterday." Rose McDowall and Jill Bryson were Strawberry Switchblade. Their accents sound Scottish...is that right? They're very lightweight, (no Ecto goddesses IMHO) but lots of fun, and besides, anyone who covers "Jolene" (a *wonderful* song!) is a-ok in my book, even though their version pales next to the original. OUCH! Apparently I was being way too liberal with the "pause" function, because there's a song after the SS segment by someone unknown who looks very interesting....only I just recorded about 15 seconds of it! :-( :-( So, to gather the collective knowledge of Ecto at hand, perhaps someone can identify this. The woman looks like she has her hair up in a bun (no, it's not Mari Wilson) and is wearing a black and grey poncho-like thing. She's standing on a black and white checked floor. At one point she keeps disappearing and re-appearing at different places on the checked floor set. The music is fast, upbeat, kinda jazzy, and there are no lyrics, just her doing scat-like do-be-do-wops. A couple of scenes show band mem- bers, an upright bass player, a keyboardist and a drummer hitting on the hi-hats. If you tell me I have 15 seconds of Helen and the Horns, I will probably commit hiri-kiri, because I *love* Helen & the Horns, I've only got 2 EPs by them, and I discovered them 5 years *after* this show was taped. Well, if if it is ole' Helen & her merry band of hornblowers, I do want to know, so I can write it down. Anyone? Anyone? Vickie ------------------------------ From: WretchAwry Date: Wed, 22 Feb 95 12:07:15 EST Subject: NO NO NO NO NO NO NO (Re: Kind Dirk wrote: > Michael Klouda wrote: > > > Additionally, many of us ectophiles read but don't respond, does our lack > > on direct involvement separate us from being part of the group? > > I believe that those who do not interact, those who are only reading, > watching or listening, are not members of a group. If you are watching > a talk show or live discussion on TV, because you're interested in the > topic, you're only listening to what the others say and they are not > aware of you. You don't belong to the group, you only belong to the > set of anonymous watchers, and that's not a group, either. I don't know how this was meant, or how it will be taken, but I want to stress that *I* think of lurkers as Ectophiles, and part of the group! Always have, always will. Dirk, how can you point to the Birthday list and say that just because you don't know who someone is that they're not part of the group? The people on the birthday list put their name there because they wanted to be part of *that* part of Ecto, and they're showing their intentions that in that way. STILL, there are tons of lurkers (and posters) who are very much a part of Ecto who are *not* on the Birthday list, so that still is not an indicator that someone is or is not part of the group. Everyone who wants to be here, is part of the group. I'll say it over and over and over again. Lurkers and semi-lurkers.... If you're *interested* in this group, then you're part of the group. Someone who subscribes for a few days, to see what it's like, decides they don't like it, and leaves, is not part of the group. They joined, then left. They were temporary Ectophiles until they decided not to be Ectophiles anymore. BUT...those who join the list, like the list, and stay on the list, are Ectophiles, and *are* part of the group, even if they never post a thing. (a slight aside: those who tried Ecto, liked it, but couldn't handle the volume and had to unsubscribe are in a different category than those who aren't interested in Happy or the "ecto" culture at all, and who joined temporarily out of curiousity) I don't think Dirk meant to hurt anyone's feelings, but I'm always ready to jump in for damage control :-). Dirk, perhaps you don't realize that there are people who have been on Ecto since the very or near beginning who have *never* *ever* *not once* posted. You can't mean that those people are not Ectophiles. And if you don't accept the newer lurkers as part of the group, you'd have to not accept those old-time lurkers as part of the group. If you accept those old-time lurkers as part of the group, then you *have* to accept *ALL* lurkers as part of the group. Lurkers...if you've been here one day, or 4 1/2 years, if you're here because you like it here and want to be here, you *are* considered an Ectophile, and *are* considered part of the group. By me, anyway, and I'm known by some as EctoMa, so if it means anything to you, I'm on your side. Always. :-) *HUGS/GUHS* to Dirk, Michael, posters, lurkers, everyone who wants one. Vickie ------------------------------ From: "she listens like her head's on fire.." Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 12:21:21 -0500 (EST) Subject: Sarah!! I'm so happy! I'm seeing Sarah MacLachlan at the end of March! Paula Cole is opening for her and I'm sitting in row L. - -Quenby ------------------------------ From: whitney@margarita.lerc.nasa.gov (nancy whitney) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 12:53:22 -0500 Subject: NO NO NO NO NO NO NO (Re: Kind WretchAwry writes: > Dirk wrote: > > > Michael Klouda wrote: > > > > > Additionally, many of us ectophiles read but don't respond, does our lack > > > on direct involvement separate us from being part of the group? > > > > I believe that those who do not interact, those who are only reading, > > watching or listening, are not members of a groups not a group, either. What a load of crap. I tend to lurk. I post when I have something to say and if I have time, which is not that often. I get a lot from just reading others postings - I have learned a lot about Happy, I find out about a lot of new music, get peoples opinions on various subjects, find out about upcoming tours - whatever! Since when did this definition come about that you have to post to be a 'member' - makes me want to unsubscribe!! When I first joined ecto (only around 6 or 8 months ago) it was this cool flame free easy going group that seemed to have the most positive attitude of any group I was on (of course, firewalls and bugtraq aren't necessarily *meant* to be quite as nice I guess). I never felt threatened or judged. Now it seems like you somehow have to 'perform' to be considered 'a member'. Sheesh. > If you're *interested* in this group, then you're part of the group. YES! My feelings exactly. Thanks, Vickie! Regards - and lurk-on if you like, folks! Nancy ------------------------------ From: brianb@netcom.com (Brian Bloom) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 09:59:46 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: NO NO NO NO NO NO NO (Re: Kind Vickie, I think Dirk and the others were still just mulling over the definition of "group". Lurkers could be included/excluded from the text book definition depending on one's point of view. Lurkers are of course fully welcome and considered part of *our* Ectophile family regardless of how one classifies the "group" definition. But then, we here at Ecto tend not to restrict ourselves to traditional definitions and limits. ;) br!an the moo-man, moping at home with a nasty case of chicken pox. *sigh* - -- __ ____ __ ____ __ __ (__==__) /\ \ / \_\ / /\ / \ \ / |\ / /\ (oo) ( moo.) / \_\ / /\ |_| / / /| /\ \ \ / ||/ / / /-------\/ -' / /\ | |\ \/ /_/_ / / / \ \/ \ \ / |/ / / / | U.T.|| / \/ |_| \ __ \_\ /_/ / \ /\ \_\ / /| / / * ||----|| / /\ ./_/ \ \ \/_/_\_\/ \ \ \/_// / | / / ^^ ^^ \ \/ |_| \ \_\ /_/\ \ \_\ /_/ /|_/ / Br!an Bloom \__/_/ \/_/ \_\/ \/_/ \_\/ \_\/ brianb@netcom.com .. but music hides me so well, ..and reveals me.. oh well - HR ------------------------------ From: nightwol@dircon.co.uk (Steve Fagg) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 18:19:59 +0000 Subject: Re: NO NO NO NO NO NO NO (Re: Kind At 12:07 pm 22/2/95 -0500, WretchAwry wrote: >Dirk wrote: >> >> Michael Klouda wrote: >> > Additionally, many of us ectophiles read but don't respond, does our lack >> > on direct involvement separate us from being part of the group? >> >> I believe that those who do not interact, those who are only reading, >> watching or listening, are not members of a group. > >I don't know how this was meant, or how it will be taken, but I want to >stress that *I* think of lurkers as Ectophiles, and part of the group! >Always have, always will. I'm with Vickie (and subsequently Brian) on this one! Lurkers, semi-lurkers, regular posters, newbies, old-timers and anybody else reading this who doesn't think they fit in any of the previous categories (knowing Ecto, that will be the vast majority of you! ;-)) are ALL ectophiles by my definition and therefore are ALL part of our group. If that means we are not a 'group' according to some accademic definition, well then I think that says something about academic definitions (IMO)! :-) Ecto has proved itself to be a wonderful bunch of people time and time again. It is one of the few 'group's the accusation that I was a member of which that I would unreservedly accept. I love you ALL (lurkers included)! *HUGS* to all who *HUG* Steve - -- Steve Fagg a.k.a. Nightwol ( 'phone: +44-1279-402437 ) ( s.l.fagg@bnr.co.uk (work) nightwol@dircon.co.uk (home) ) *** We tried to add it all up and got merely sunrise. *** *** Try putting that in a letter to someone in exile. *** ------------------------------ From: WretchAwry Date: Wed, 22 Feb 95 13:32:21 EST Subject: Anna Domino-SxSW & Victoria Williams tour dates These were stolen from rec.music.misc: - ---------------------------- From: micheld105@aol.com (MichelD105) Date: 15 Feb 1995 13:53:24 -0500 Newsgroups: rec.music.misc Subject: ANNA DOMINO Anna Domino will be performing at the South by SouthWest festival in Austin, TX on march 17, 8pm at Chicago House. Want to know more about Anna ? Visit the Light of Day home page: http://www.cerf.net/bien/lode (Vickie here...AUSTINITES, DON'T MISS ANNA!!! SHE'S **WONDERFUL**!!!) - ---------------------------- From: tiverson@lynx.dac.neu.edu (Thor Iverson) Date: 20 Feb 1995 23:19:07 -0500 Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll,rec.music.misc,alt.music.alternative Subject: VICTORIA WILLIAMS Tour Dates ***Victoria Williams Tour Dates*** DATE CITY VENUE WITH 3/17/95 AUSTIN, TX TEXAS UNION BALLROOM (SXSW) VIC CHESTNUTT 3/19/95 NASHVILLE, TN 328 PERFORMANCE HALL 3/20/95 ATHENS, GA MORTON THEATER 3/21/95 ATLANTA, GA VARIETY PLAYHOUSE 3/22/95 CARRBORO, NC CAT'S CRADLE 3/23/95 ALEXANDRIA, VA BIRCHMERE 3/25/95 NEW YORK, NY TOWN HALL VIC CHESTNUTT 3/26/95 PHILADELPHIA, PA THEATRE OF LIVING ARTS 3/27/95 BOSTON, MA SOMERVILLE THEATRE VIC CHESTNUTT 3/29/95 TORONTO, ON BATHURST THEATRE 3/30/95 CHICAGO, IL PARK WEST VIC CHESTNUTT 3/31/95 COLUMBIA, MO TBA 4/1/95 MINNEAPOLIS, MN GUTHRIE THEATRE VIC CHESTNUTT 4/4/95 SEATTLE, WA BACKSTAGE 4/5/95 PORTLAND, OR ALADDIN TEHATRE 4/7/95 SAN FRANCISCO, CA GREAT AMERICAN MUSIC HALL 4/8/95 LOS ANGELES, CA TBA Please check local venues for further confirmation and show times. Additional dates will be posted when they are available. Thor Iverson, Atlantic Records (Vickie here...anyone in any of these cities...DON'T MISS VICTORIA!!) - -------------------------------- Vickie (who's already gone on and on and on about how wonderful Victoria is, so trust me on Anna Domino) ------------------------------ End of ecto-digest V2 #29 ************************* ======================================================================== Please send any questions or comments about the list to ecto-owner@nsmx.rutgers.edu