Errors-To: owner-ecto@ns1.rutgers.edu Reply-To: ecto@ns1.rutgers.edu Sender: ecto@ns1.rutgers.edu From: ecto@ns1.rutgers.edu To: ecto-request@ns1.rutgers.edu Bcc: ecto-digest-outbound@ns1.rutgers.edu Subject: ecto #562 ecto, Number 562 Thursday, 6 May 1993 Today's Topics: *-----------------* new equipose cover morph! more sex Happa Happa! On the other hand... HaPpY Birthday Re: ecto statistics another WOW! Re: ectophiles at the eastern naturist gathering in mid June Thanks! Re: Olivier olivieri + film endings ======================================================================== Date: Thu, 6 May 93 0:55:13 EDT From: jessica Subject: new equipose cover morph! Bob Kollmeyer has provided a new equipoise cover morph! "that this time really is" he says. :) The new morph is a 20-frame 267x207x256 morph. The last one was just a color fade-in/out, as it turns out. Of more interest to most are a few individual frames Bob gif-ified. They are numbered as they appear in the morph. With the addition of these new files to the archives, I have reorganized the gifs area a bit. I've also updated the INDEX... The new files are in ~ftp/pub/hr/gifs/Equipoise/{emorf267.zip,haptrk*.gif}. Enjoy! Many thanks to Bob for providing them! jessica || jessica || It is this that || Don't try to tell me there's no reason for || || lawrence || brings us || any moment in time, every memory of mine. || || koeppel || together. || Those years are lines of color on my face, || || dembski || --Kate || the past is warpaint. --Happy Rhodes || ======================================================================== Date: Thu, 6 May 93 00:57:20 EDT From: mojzes@monet.rutgers.edu (brni) Subject: more sex woj says >Mike Mendelson sez: >{story of person migrating from hetero to homo to hetero tendencies} >>So now you say that clearly they are at least bisexual, since they've >>now had both gay and non-gay liaisons. > >"at least" bisexual? is there anything more? ;) > pan-sexual? omni-sexual? of course, there are laws about this sort of thing, but then again there are lots of stupid laws. >i've been avoiding this discussion for a while, but since it's about died >down, i figure i'll toss in my two pfennig. > >my feeling is that the terms heterosexual, homosexual and even bisexual >are purely constructs. human beings are *sexual* creatures who possess >the urges, desires and capabilty to have sex with a member of either gender >(note: "to have sex" does not imply intercourse, rather i use it to mean >"to bring to orgasm"). granted, some folks may have less of a desire for >one gender than the other, but, as mjm pointed out, i can't believe that >a person will have fantasies about and desires for only one gender exclu- >sively. > or rather, humans are sexual beings for whom the object of desire can be either fixed or dynamic. this is one of the few places where i think that freud was pretty insightful. as children the object of desire is a very ambiguous thing; almost anything can have some element of sexuality, but in not in the way that we as adults can even imagine it anymore. we are used to the more rarified version of sexuality, generally a *produced* sexuality (in my last post i already talked about consciousness being produced by the interactions of internal and external forces; sexuality is a componant of this) that fixes our object of desire as some particular object, or type of object (this can be men, women, shoes, pain, power, whatever), or some hybrid mix of objects. it is certainly possible that people could have fantasies and desires for only one gender exclusively, and if kinsey's study is any indication, there exists a minority for whom this is true. i don't think that we should hold that against them tho ;^>. (as an aside, to bring to orgasm is not necessary for sex to occur. i know that i've been in situations where one or more people did *not* have orgasms, but there was definately sex going on. i have also met people who have some sort of philosophical thing against orgasm (it interrupts sex, they say), and try to prolong the sex itself by intention- ally not having orgasms. (one person was raving about how wonderful it was to be able to have sex for 6 hours straight)). >the labels are there so you can identify specific instances of sexual be- >havior. however, a person's sexuality can not be generalized from those >actions -- it's just too complex an issue to simplify to an on/off switch. >i'm not going to quibble with anyone who chooses to use a label to des- >cribe themself -- it's a matter of comfort -- but i am certainly uncom- >fortable calling myself anything other than sexual. (or ambisexual ;) > >woj > the complexity of the issue cannot be denied, and yet people on *all* sides of the fence (and its one of those esher fences, btw :) ) are consistently trying to make as simplistic as possible. for a lot of straights, one is either straight, or a homo faggot (and probably a commie too, or is that term out of fashion?). meanwhile, a lot of gays that i've met make the exact inverse judgements: either you are interested in same-sex relationships exclusively, or you are some sort of traitor. (some of my SO's friends have recently made a point to accuse her of "abandoning [her] ideals in the face of heterosexuality" while looking pointedly at me. hmph. as far as i'm concerned, an ideal that prevents someone from dealing with another person *as a person* (and not as some member of some group) is an ideal worth abandoning. i think i got sidetracked. and it is too late to care. c ya later brni ======================================================================== Date: Thu, 6 May 93 2:20:37 EDT From: WretchAwry Subject: Happa Happa! Oooh pooh! I've been getting a busy signal ever since I got back from the Uni (it's Shownight folks! I played an hour of Penelope Houston) so I wasn't able to get this in on time, but it's no less sincere... HAPPY BIRTHDAY to Mark Semich!! (my faithful companion searching the streets of Philly to find a Philadelphia Inquirer with the article about Happy) *Hugeroos* Vickie ======================================================================== Date: Thu, 6 May 93 2:34:27 EDT From: WretchAwry Subject: On the other hand... ...since I just checked and saw that I'm on *this* side of the International Date Line, I find I'm not late at all with Mark's birthday wishes! Isn't technology wonderful? You can actually find out the date by pushing a little button on your watch! Hey, digital watches *are* a pretty neat idea!! Vickie ps, yep, got my dosage upped :-) ======================================================================== Date: Thu, 06 May 93 08:28:39 +0100 From: Terry Partis Subject: HaPpY Birthday Here's wishing Happy birthdays to Mark Semich on 6th. May and to Joe Dembski on 7th. May. Have great days folks Peace Terry === Only in your eyes lies your soul ========================= Happy Rhodes === _ __ Jolly Hockeysticks _ __ / `-' ( ,,, / `-' ( ,,, | I I ||||||[:::] Terry (Tel Boy) Partis | I I ||||||[:::] \_.-._( ''' (tgp@ukc.ac.uk) \_.-._( ''' With a smile and a song - I'm HaPpy Let me sleep awhile and dream of Avalon and the Beltane fires.................. ............................................our souls entwined for all eternity Z ======================================================================== Date: Thu, 6 May 93 3:46:32 EDT From: WretchAwry Subject: Re: ecto statistics Evan makes an appearance: > Steve Fagg writes: > > Welcome aboard Evan! How about giving us your reactions to the Happy > > music you've heard so far? And have you had any feedback from Scott? > > Okay, okay, first of all credit where credit is due: thanks to Steve for > sending me a sampler and thanks to Vickie for arranging it and for inviting > me to join ecto. Cheers and HUG respectively. Hey Evan, welcome to Ecto! You're welcome & *Hug* back!! > The sampler has one/two tracks from all the albums as far as I can make > out. Confusingly for me, my two faves are "Be Careful What You Say" and > "When the Rain Came Down" which are labelled "CD Bonus Tracks." Can anyone > (Steve?) explain what this means exactly? They weren't on the original cassettes. (The 1st4 were only available on cassettes until last...I can't believe it, my mind is going and I can't remember when the CDs were released. May 1992? Hmmm, if so, Happy Birthday to the CDs! Anyway, all 4 CDs have Bonus Tracks. They're great to have, but there was a trade-off, because Happy edited and shortened 2 songs, "The Chase" and "Dreams Are." Thank goodness she left "To Be E Mortal" alone! I know you haven't heard these songs yet, but you will, soon enough. I don't remember the chronology of the 2 songs you mentioned, but I'd guess Be Careful was recorded in 1988, since it was on a demo tape that Happy & Kevin, as Bartlett\Rhodes, made. Rain was almost certainly recorded in either 1990 or 1991. Probably 1991, but don't quote me yet, because it almost made it onto Warpaint. I'll have to either dig up my post about the Bonus tracks, or try to remember to ask Happy again. Be Careful is on the _Rearmament_ CD and Rain is on the _Ecto_ CD. Again, I'm *SO* glad to have them on CD, but they still jar me sometimes because I'm so used to the original cassettes and plus, those songs in particular don't "fit" the albums they were tacked onto. In other words, Be Careful isn't like anything else on Rearmament, and Rain isn't like anything else on Ecto, except a song called "Look for The Child," but *that* song is a bonus track too. I bow and scrape in gratitude that Happy included these songs on the CDs, but I also listen to my original cassettes every now and then too. Evan, I think you'll *love* "Look For The Child." > I had an amusing thought that I've already shared with Vickie; wouldn't > Happy do a great cover of "Don't Give Up," singing both parts? I love it! Maybe we should start a letter-writing campaign :-) > I particularly like her high range where she sounds an awful lot like KaTe. > Can anyone tell me if this is something she has used more/less over time? Much, much more on the 1st4, not so much on Warpaint, more (than I expected she would) on Equipoise. I once predicted that the time would come when she wouldn't use her high voice anymore. I'm very pleased that I was wrong. The little amount on Warpaint led me to think that she was phasing it out, except for the occasional background vocals. Yet, Equipoise is *full* on her high voice. Great! > It's taken me a long time to get off my arse and get hold of some Happy and > I'm glad I finally did. So much for ESP. Don't you know that for the last 2 years I've been sending you vibes? ("Evan, try some Happy Rhodes. Eeeeevvvvvaaaaannnn...") Been sending them to Scott Telford & Neil Calton too, but I guess I can scratch Scott :-). For now :-). I vibed at GrahamD too and it worked! (thanks too to Meredith there...) There are others, but all in all, I think the success rate is pretty good! (Curiousity is a most wonderful thing. All agreed say "Aye!") > Now, final question: does anyone have some GIFs or JPGs of Happy. I'd be > interested to be able to put a face to her. Don't nobody flame me or nuthin' > but I have this image of Buffy St. Marie-like in my head and I'm sure it's > not appropriate. Don't be so sure...:-) anonymous ftp hardees.rutgers.edu pub/hr/gifs (Did I send you a FAQ?) Vickie ======================================================================== From: Steve Fagg Subject: Re: ecto statistics Date: Thu, 6 May 93 9:08:51 BST On Wed, 5 May 93 at 13:59:04 BST welsh@epcc.ed.ac.uk wrote: > Steve Fagg writes: > > Welcome aboard Evan! How about giving us your reactions to the Happy > > music you've heard so far? And have you had any feedback from Scott? > > Okay, okay, first of all credit where credit is due: thanks to Steve for > sending me a sampler and thanks to Vickie for arranging it and for inviting > me to join ecto. Cheers and HUG respectively. Cheers! I wasn't angling for a public credit, Evan, honestly! But thanks all the same. Vickie should share the credit as she selected the tracks from the First 4. > The sampler has one/two tracks from all the albums as far as I can make > out. Confusingly for me, my two faves are "Be Careful What You Say" and > "When the Rain Came Down" which are labelled "CD Bonus Tracks." Can anyone > (Steve?) explain what this means exactly? These two tracks are included as "bonus" tracks on the CD versions of "Rearmament" and "Ecto" (but I can't remember which CD has which of those tracks on it off hand - I don't have the CDs with me here at work). They did not appear on the original cassette releases of those albums. Happy sent Vickie some tapes of unreleased material and these songs were made available to Ectophiles via Doug's tape dubbing project. So I still think of these tracks as not "really" being part of the albums, though I guess for many (maybe even by now "most") of Happy's fans they are as much part of the albums they appear on as any of the other tracks. BTW: does anybody know if the cassettes now feature the extra tracks? Are they still handassembled by H&K, or do they now have a commercial deal for making the tapes? > I like them all so I'm going to > start sending off for the CDs soon, probably in chronological order. Sounds like a good idea to me. Rhodes I & II are pretty similar to each other, but after that there is a definite progression with each album (not always in a straight line, mind you!) which it is fascinating to follow. Of course if you follow this policy, you won't get either of your "favourites" until your third purchase, but there's no end of good stuff on the first two albums to keep you occupied. > The > mail order prices work out cheaper than it would cost to buy CDs in a UK > shop, belive it or not. If you ever find a UK source of Happy's CDs, you will be sure to let us know won't you. As far as I know no shop over here has ever had any on sale. Hopefully this will change as H&K (& Suzanne) get more distribution deals lined up. Of course mail order from Aural Gratification does have the advantage (if you're into that sort of thing, which *I* am) that Happy will autograph the CDs for you. > Scott was less enamoured of Happy's music. The best > I could get out of him was that he didn't dislike it. I wasn't too > surprised since I couldn't even get him to be enthusiastic about Tori. > ;-) I have generally had more success in interesting people in Tori than I have with Happy, though Equipoise seems to have worked the trick on one recalcitrant friend who had proved strangely immune to the blandishments of first "Warpaint" and then a sampler of the First 4. Tori he liked on his first listening to my "Little Earthquakes" CD and he recently expressed interest in getting an Indigo Girls CD after I subjected him to that, but Happy took surprisingly long to get through! > Now, final question: does anyone have some GIFs or JPGs of Happy. I'd be > interested to be able to put a face to her. Don't nobody flame me or nuthin' > but I have this image of Buffy St. Marie-like in my head and I'm sure it's > not appropriate. There are quite a few GIFs in the Ecto archives (see the FAQ Vickie sent you for details), but I don't know of any JPGs. Not having FTP access myself the only GIF I have is one called promo.gif which Jessica very kindly sent me by email. This makes a wonderful workstation background. Happy has the most gorgeous eyes, so I try to arrange the windows on my Sun so that her eyes don't get obscured. Of course, it could be said that the best picture of Happy is that on the cover of Rhodes I :-) > (That's a long post, for me!) And this is an unusually long one from me, in recent weeks. I'm snowed under with work at the moment and I really shouldn't be typing this, so I'll stop forthwith and get back to doing what BNR pay me for! -- Regards Steve Fagg ( S.L.Fagg@bnr.co.uk +44-279-402437 ) BNR Europe Ltd., London Road, Harlow, Essex, CM17 9NA, UK *** "Better drowned than duffers. If not duffers, won't drown". *** ======================================================================== From: welsh@epcc.ed.ac.uk Date: Thu, 6 May 93 10:33:42 BST Subject: Re: ecto statistics WretchAwry writes: > Evan makes an appearance: >> I particularly like her high range where she sounds an awful lot like KaTe. >> Can anyone tell me if this is something she has used more/less over time? > Much, much more on the 1st4, not so much on Warpaint, more (than I > expected she would) on Equipoise. I once predicted that the time would > come when she wouldn't use her high voice anymore. I'm very pleased > that I was wrong. The little amount on Warpaint led me to think that > she was phasing it out, except for the occasional background vocals. > Yet, Equipoise is *full* on her high voice. Great! That's a relief. > So much for ESP. Don't you know that for the last 2 years I've been > sending you vibes? ("Evan, try some Happy Rhodes. Eeeeevvvvvaaaaannnn...") > Been sending them to Scott Telford & Neil Calton too, but I guess I > can scratch Scott :-). For now :-). I vibed at GrahamD too and it > worked! (thanks too to Meredith there...) Please, don't you remember what happened the last time somebody mentioned vibes? (On gaffa, anyway!) > There are others, but all in all, I think the success rate is pretty > good! (Curiousity is a most wonderful thing. All agreed say "Aye!") Och aye! >> Now, final question: does anyone have some GIFs or JPGs of Happy. I'd be >> interested to be able to put a face to her. Don't nobody flame me or nuthin' >> but I have this image of Buffy St. Marie-like in my head and I'm sure it's >> not appropriate. > Don't be so sure...:-) I've had a wee look at the FTP site you mentioned and if she isn't wearing a feather headdress (?) then she doesn't look like BSM to me. I've only ever seen BSM with headdress. Anyone care to tell me what the correct term is? > (Did I send you a FAQ?) Yes. I found a booboo in it, remember? ;-) -- _____________________________________________________________________ / Evan Welsh \ \ Edinburgh Parallel Computing Centre (+44 31 650 5960) / ======================================================================== Date: Thu, 6 May 93 11:37:12 +0200 From: yngveh@stud.cs.uit.no (Yngve Hauge) Subject: another WOW! As I came home early yesterday morning I saw a packet on the kitchen table. Immediatly I thought of the cassettes from Doug and I knew it was them as soon as I saw the stamp :) (THANKS DOUG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) I played some of them before I fell asleep (I hadn't slept for 48 hours) and continued as I woke up 12 hours later (in the evening :)) The live-tapes are great! Now I'm working myself through 'The Femme Music Collection'. I got to do it slowly cause I'm looking up every artist/group (95 of them). I have done that work now......but there were a lot of them not being in my CD-Catalogue :( (I'll ask you about them later, Vickie..... ) What I've heard upto now is wonderful (The artists/groups being in the catalogue are marked as priority wants) One of those I've 'injected' with Happy is borrowing the live-tapes till tomorrow (errr...I got last one still) He asked so nice that I just had to let him borrow them (I'm too kind :() But he promiced to give them back tomorrow. I hope he keeps his word :) Hmmmm, just when I am talking about those - I know some guy who copies cassettes to CD....I guess I'll ask him to do it (It costs a lot of money, but those tapes or let's say Happy deserves to get onto CD) If I got the time and money I'll get the interviews and femme collection onto CD as well.......(I don't know exactly how much he takes but as soon as I know I'll tell you) I've tried to hear Happy's voice in my mind but I didn't ever think it was so beautiful (WOW!!!) I'm in love with that voice !!!!!!! (:):):)) error #100......OUT OF MEMORY....error #1...Missing brain capasity... belated Happy Birthdays inserted..................................... sssssssssrrrrrrrrdffffffffferfdssdrefd -- T ---- Only In Your Eyes Lies Your Soul.............. H | --- ----- ---- --- - -- - - - - - --- E |-- | | | | | | |__| | | |_ | | | | | |--- | | | | | --- --- - - ---- - - - -- - - - --- --- Yngve Hauge (yngveh@stud.cs.uit.no).....University of Tromsoe...Norway ======================================================================== Date: Thu, 6 May 93 05:08 CDT From: chrisw@fciad2.bsd.uchicago.edu (chris williams) Subject: Re: ectophiles at the eastern naturist gathering in mid June Chris here, Michael M.Y. Hui asks: > Is anyone going to attend? I plan to. Email me to coordinate if you're > planning to be there. > It's at Camp Barrett in the Pocono mountains in the state of Pennsylvania. > The camp is spread over 1000 acres, most of it wooded with lots of trails > and lots of natural wonders to see and explore. > To set the scene, I'll relate a very pleasant experience I had recently at > our local clothing-optional corner of a park near here: > The place was deserted, on a warm overcast day, a sparsely wooded hillside > had diffused sunlight shining through, with a warm breeze and the sound of > a waterfall a hundred feet away, with the occasional mist from the > waterfall carried over by the wind, birds singing throughout the forest, on > a clearing among the trees, on level ground on soft soil: I did my complete > repertoire of yoga exercises; and it was the most relaxing thing I've done > in a long time, both for the mind and for the body. I don't post much to Ecto, but I always read. This caught my eye. When I was a kid, my family had a summer cabin at a "nudist colony." (I guess that term is no longer "PC" but that's what we called it.) It was a wonderful experience. It was in southern Missouri in what could be called the "upper Ozarks" and very isolated. The owner of the camp and his family lived in a caboose on a hill overgrown with wild berries, and the dozen or so families lived in everything from tents to schoolbuses. My dad built a cabin one summer and we had almost all the comforts of home, except for having to use an outdoor privy. We had a small kitchen, and I remember one of the best parts was hunting morel mushrooms for breakfast. I haven't had morels since for fear of being disappointed. I forget exactly how old I was during the several summers my family spent there, but definitely preteen. The other kids were from toddlers (natural-born nudists) to teenagers. I remember driving to the place we could hardly wait to run around nude and us kids would strip in the car. This was *way* out in the middle of nowhere. There was a big "swimming hole" with old tires hung from ropes from the branches of huge old trees. Everyone ran around barefoot, and folks were very careful with bottles and trash. This place is one of my happiest memories, and if there were any ill psychological effects, I haven't an inkling. The *positive* effects were many. The people there covered a fairly wide range of body types and weights, and we accepted people as they are. Short, tall, fat, skinny, hairy, hairless - I'm so glad that I didn't grow up with the sort of mindset that so many males have, that the only attractive females fall into a narrow 10-20 lb weight range. I noticed that most men's equipment *is* of a perfectly _average_ size, and I was able to avoid one of the major sources of male anxiety. Women's breasts come in an incredible variety of shapes and sizes, but as no one wore any devices to try to squeeze them into one standard shape (this was the early sixties and these devices were mandatory out in the real world) I never became fixated on one specific form factor. Nudist children, being familiar with what the human body looks like, don't tend to do as much experimentation as other children. I've also read that we tend to loose our virginities later. This was true in my case. I didn't lose it until I was nineteen, to a far more experienced fiveteen-year-old. The thing that surprises most people about this kind of place is how non-sexual it is. When you bring something out into the open, that thing will lose it's power over you. Women are often reduced to sex objects in normal life - "Oh, if she leans forward *just* a little more I can catch a glimpse of nipple!" When *everyone* is naked, *no one* is a sex object. Oh sure, the really large places have a small percentage of gawkers, but they are soon satiated like new chocolate factory workers allowed to eat their fill. Once you learn how little difference there is between bodies, you really pay attention to faces. One negative about all this is my total inability to take clothes seriously. I hate shopping for clothes, and tend to go only when forced. I'll pick up new socks and underwear on a regular basis, and I buy t-shirts at concerts or get them free at trade shows, but I tend to wear pants until they are falling apart, then go out to K-Mart and buy six pairs of the same pants in different colors to last me another year or so. As a result, I tend to look like a computer geek. but that's ok, as I seem to have become a computer geek, and growing up nudist I am totally *comfortable* being a computer geek. Chris Williams of Chris'n'Vickie of Chicago chrisw@fciad2.bsd.uchicago.edu "There's less difference between George Bush and an African Bushman, than between a terrier and a Lasa Ahpso. If we were dogs, we'd all be the same breed" - P.J. O'Rorake ======================================================================== Date: Wed, 5 May 1993 13:42:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Gray Abbott Subject: Thanks! Thanks for the birthday wishes. They were sweet. This year for my birthday, I quit my job. It was an interesting experience. I quit because we're moving back to Texas, after 18 years in New England, so my kids can see more of their grandmothers. We'll be moving to Austin in August. I'll be at this address until then and will send my new address when I have it. I'll be starting a new job, as Director of Research for Istar International, opening up their Austin office. Anyone down Austin-way: I'm looking for suggestions on places to look at houses and office space. For houses, I'm looking to rent a 4 bedroom for about a year, until I can decide where I want to buy something. A *big* yard would be nice, since I'm giving up my 160 acre lot, here in New Hampshire :-( For an office, I'd like to find an "executive suite" where I can share services (secretary/receptionist, xerox, FAX, etc.) with some other folks, preferably in high-tech (so I have someone to talk to). I'll need an office and a connected lab space (for my evil experiments, ha ha!). I'll be visiting Austin 5/14-5/23, so if there's something I should check out during that time, let me know. OK, you can go back to talking about music, now. Gray ======================================================================== From: welsh@epcc.ed.ac.uk Date: Thu, 6 May 93 11:51:29 BST Subject: Re: Olivier olivieri + film endings kosky@saul.cis.upenn.edu (Anthony Kosky) writes: > In a somewhat different vain, I saw Splitting Heirs this weekend and > it was alot of fun. John Cleese's part was quite small but especially > good. On the other hand I should probably be careful about > recommending comedy, since I'm never sure whether it's going to turn > out to be one of those British humour things that no one else > understands or thinks is funny. I remember talking some friends (who > liked Python in general) to rent Jaberwocky once. I was falling out of > my chair laughing while they didn't even give a twitch of amusement, > and ended up stopping watching it half way through. Ah well. Well, Rick Moranis is very good in it as well, so that ought to kindle some Trans-Atlantic interest. And I defy anyone not to laugh at the French motorists "riding" their bicycles. Like Anthony, I'm not going to stick my neck out and recommend it to anyone who isn't British. If he, having spent years in the US can't tell, then who am I to judge? I've even less idea what comedy Europeans like, since most of our imported comedy is from the US. Does that cover everyone on the group? Is anyone not British, European or North American? Personally, I thought it was excellent comedy. Catherine Zeta Jones (Wow, I bet she's a big name outside the UK. NOT!) provides the romantic interest. Am I posting too much? I'll shut up for a while. -- _____________________________________________________________________ / Evan Welsh \ \ Edinburgh Parallel Computing Centre (+44 31 650 5960) / ======================================================================== The ecto archives are on hardees.rutgers.edu in ~ftp/pub/hr. There is an INDEX file explaining what is where. Feel free to send me things you'd like to have added. -- jessica (jessica@ns1.rutgers.edu)