Errors-To: ecto-owner@ns1.rutgers.edu Reply-To: ecto@ns1.rutgers.edu Sender: ecto@ns1.rutgers.edu From: ecto@ns1.rutgers.edu To: ecto-request@ns1.rutgers.edu Bcc: ecto-digest-outbound@ns1.rutgers.edu Subject: ecto #1057 ecto, Number 1057 Thursday, 24 March 1994 Today's Topics: *-----------------* Re: piano blurb Re: MAJOR NEWS! Re: Bits and Pieces Sarah in the Times Re: Sarah in the Times Anthony's starting to happen Re: Sarah in the Times irc halucinations Tori Day in L.A. Talked to Kevin... Re: The Kate Bush Convention + Too Much Drama, Not Enough SOng Re: Canada shopping list Smooth operator--NOT and other stories Sarah on Today ======================================================================== Date: Thu, 24 Mar 1994 07:37:28 -0500 (EST) From: Michael Colford Subject: Re: piano blurb On Wed, 23 Mar 1994, Neil K. Guy wrote: > Frankly, I think it was *terrible* to award the academy award to such > a young child. I can't imagine her life is going to be anything > approximating normal after that. How the hell can you go through life > living up to such a high-profile award? But then what do I know about > the weird life of child stars? I have read that Anna is going to retire from film now that she has one her award. Hmmm. Personally, I was rooting for Rosie Perez, from the woefully underrated and absolutely stunning film, Fearless, for the supporting actress category. Ah well. Michael ======================================================================== From: guetzlaf@rhea.cray.com (Cathy Guetzlaff) Subject: Re: MAJOR NEWS! Date: Thu, 24 Mar 1994 10:26:52 -0600 (CST) >Just found out that Loreena McKennitt will be playing at Gaston Hall (site >of the recent Sarah McLachlan show I raved about) on Friday, May 13th at >8:00pm. > >Miraculously, this is when Ecto's own Cathy Guetzlaff will be in DC. 'Miraculously' is right! All the really good concerts usually happen the day before I arrive or the day after I leave any given place. Perhaps I've unknowingly paid the last installment on a long-standing karmic debt and things will start going my way now. Speaking of concerts, the Cocteau Twins (all seven of 'em!) were in town last night at The Guthrie Theatre. Splendid concert although the Guthrie's acoustics were a tad overwhelmed at times by the walls and walls of music. Interesting crowd, lots of Doc Martens, facial piercings, uniquely colored hair. I did feel at times like I was sitting in the midst of the University of Minnesota's graduating class of 1997. Nice to see that these young pups know and appreciate good music! -- Cathy Guetzlaff Cray Research, Inc. guetzlaf@cray.com ======================================================================== Subject: Re: Bits and Pieces Date: Thu, 24 Mar 94 12:38:29 -0500 From: lcliffor@bbn.com You're certainly not the only one who thought 'Philadelphia' was only so-so... saying Tom Hanks was horrible is a tad extreme, I think, though. I was all for Hopkins myself - that one scene where Thompson tries to get him to tell her what he's reading is one of the greatest bits of acting I've seen. period. I hate all this political 'well he just won recently and he's British' rationale for choosing what's supposed to be the 'best'. Laura ======================================================================== Date: Thu, 24 Mar 94 10:07:29 PST From: Neal Copperman Subject: Sarah in the Times ---------- X-Sun-Data-Type: text X-Sun-Data-Description: text X-Sun-Data-Name: text X-Sun-Content-Lines: 3 I sent this review a bit differently than I usually do, so someone tell me if it caused anyone problems. ---------- X-Sun-Data-Type: default X-Sun-Data-Description: default X-Sun-Data-Name: temp X-Sun-Content-Lines: 36 This appeared in the LA Times a week or so ago, in their record review section. FUMBLING TOWARDS EXCITEMENT **1/2 (out of 4) SARAH McLACHLAN "Fumbling Towards Ecstasy" Arista On McLAchlan's third album, her singing is formal and studied, like teh performance of an actress portraying a New Age troubadour in a stage musical. When intensity is called for, producer Pierre Marchand just generates another vocal track and layers in on, instead of requiring McLachlan to reach for something and distrub the regularity of her lulling murmer. Marchand sustains a portentous throb as he weaves the electronic- folk-ethnic environment that's become the standard setting for introspective singer-songwriters in the '90s. It's an aural womb where feelings are signified rather than summoned and conveyed. McLachlan's occasionally evocative words often involve the ways that love tangles things up, tracing a struggle to achieve a breakthrough of a spirit stifled by denial, obsession and need. They're not reallypowerful or especially demanding, and while the production fits them out with banners of urgency,her delivery is oblivious to any tensions or nuances. This preoccupation with seductive surfaces makes McLachlan a good bet in the mellow-music marketplace, but at a time when women's perspective is being expresssed so provocatively by such artists as Liz Phair and PJ Harvey, this seems especially timid and tepid. -Richard Cromelin ======================================================================== Subject: Re: Sarah in the Times Date: Thu, 24 Mar 94 13:56:11 -0500 From: jeffy@syrinx.umd.edu -------- Neal reposted a review of FTE which said, in part: >When intensity is called for, producer Pierre >Marchand just generates another vocal track and layers in on, >instead of requiring McLachlan to reach for something and distrub >the regularity of her lulling murmer. Typical idiotic reviewer. His implication is that Sarah is incapable of emoting with her voice and that she requires studio tricks to make an impact. Anyone who's heard her live can say that she can get as intense as she wants without any multitracking necessary. Personally, I *prefer* the effect of the multitracking on FTE, at least on headphones, because it's fun to try to follow the different layers. >introspective singer-songwriters in the '90s. It's an aural womb >where feelings are signified rather than summoned and conveyed. He doesn't seem to have heard of Tori Amos. Jeff ======================================================================== Date: Fri, 25 Mar 94 04:25:22 +1100 From: anthony@xymox.apana.org.au (Anthony Horan) Subject: Anthony's starting to happen I'm baaaaack! :-) I've been sooo swamped lately that I've barely had time to reply to mail, let alone read news, Ecto or rdt; finally, I have caught up with Ecto, but now I have 127 mail messages to take care of, and a 950K file that is basically the last couple of weeks of rdt. I'll get there. Apologies if I have been taking ages replying to somethign you sent me. I'm a slug. Holly knows it, I know it, it's official. :-) Anyone here heard of a band called Eve's Plum? Can you fill me in on them (who, where, when, label, albums, that sort of thing)? I just heard a song by them half an hour ago on tv and it was rather good; like Liz Phair meets Tribe meets Def FX. I want, typically, to find the album it came from. It's a new release single here in Australia but no other info was given... The Australian Record Industry Association Awards - the ARIAs to most of us - are being presented in Sydney next Wednesday, and Margot Smith is nominated for Best New Artist. She's up against tough competition from a bunch of clones, and she doesn't think she'll win, but let's all focus some fuzzy blue energy in her direction this next week anyway... :) I've been meaning to tell y'all a whole pile of stuff and I've forgotten it all. But at least I can respond to some EctoStuff... some record reviews will follow, err.. tomorrow! :) Alex posted: > I also really liked the very last video they showed. It was "Labour > of Love" by a group (duo again?) named Frente! (Mammouth Records) and > I *think* they said they were from Australia. Have they been They are, they're from right here in Melbourne. Fitzroy, to name the suburb. Wonderful band, great debut album, fab new single here called "Lonely" which features a duet with Ween on the b-side (!)... > mentioned here? I can't remember. Anyway, in this video there was a I've mentioned them here a few times; I've also sent some of their CDs to Tim Cook... I'll have a couple of Frente! tracks on the forthcoming Australian sampler... > female vocalist and a guy playing an acoustic guitar, with something > like a "recorder" here and there, and that's it. (Inside joke for The guy playing the recorder was their drummer; he's since left and the new drummer had to learn recorder so they could still do that song live! "Labor Of Love" is one of the earliest Frente! songs, from their first indie EP, before they signed to Mushroom. In fact, it was the song that got them signed. The version on the album (and the one released in the US as a single) is a re-recorded version, which luckily hardly differs from the slightly more tape-hissy original. Mushroom wanted a digitally recorded version, and they got one. :-) Dave hears Happy for the first time... some highlights... > I actually hesitated to listen to the thing. I've been on ecto for a couple > of months, and so had seen much discussion of Happy, but feared that the > notices she had received here could not help but overstate her talent. [...] > And then the chorus, and I am literally floored. Particularly in contrast to > verse, this voice is pure, open, and as emotionally as anything I have heard > in recent months, even years. ^^^^^^^^^^^^->(insert 'satisfying'). > > I won't dwell on this. I would only pour out a plethora of gushy platitudes > that would be old news for fans, and unbelievable for the uninitiated. > Suffice to say that I pulled the car off of the road so that I could focus > more fully on the music, and was actually laughing out loud in disbelief. How > could this woman be a virtual unknown? 'Back to the trees...';beautiful. This > should be the first song that every first timer hears first. I know how you felt, Dave. It's how I felt when I first played the tape Ilka made for me - I was doing some mail reading, and suddenly just wanted to close my eyes and *listen* and *feel*. I was floored, too. And incidentally, it's the first song on my own Happy sampler that I recently compiled; it made perfect sense that "Feed The Fire" should be first. Incidentally, that's my one and only gripe about Warpaint - I think the order of the first two tracks should be reversed... I wonder if Vickie still has a copy of my reaction to Happy that I mailed her when I first heard it, before I joined Ecto...? > I HAVE SEEN THE LIGHT, HALLELUJAH, now quick, someone tell me how to connect > to CDC before I go look at my credit card balance again and lose heart... You'll buy 'em all, like I did. And you won't regret it for a nanosecond. Ethan Straffinates: > AnthonyH sends us a great Tori review: *Blush* :-) Thank you! > > This is only the second album I've rated this highly in Beat; no prizes for > > guessing what the other one was... :-) > > Megadeth? Somebody's Daughter? Or perhaps a certain Australian muse? ;) Third guess lucky. Take the first and third letters of "muse" and there you have it... :-) Vickie (*HUG*) affirms: > > Second, I remember some time ago someone mentioned Kate Bush with respect > > to the soundtrack to the movie "Brazil". I watched the laserdisc over the > > The song wasn't used in the film, so I'm glad they did decide to put it > on the soundtrack. Brazil is our favorite movie, so it wasn't too hard > to pay full price for a 2-minute Kate song. It was supposed to be in the > movie, probably during one of the extended dream sequences which Gilliam > had to snip down. There's a new edit of "Brazil" coming out on laserdisc through Criterion in a few months: it should be out now, but they've been having copyright clearance problems. Gilliam's doing the new cut himself. This leads me to proffer the thought that maybe the song will finally find its way into the film... The Eurythmics music for "1984" was dropped from the theatrical version but restored for the TV version, so anything's possible... Doug Burks says about the Sibster: > absolutely hilarious, very Pythonesque. Apparently on earlier stops, > she also played the video for "Temple", but it got lost somewhere on the > tour. What a pity! This is a fantastic clip; it includes a version of the song unavailable elsewhere, re-edited by Jane herself from various different mixes. It works extremely well, the visuals are great. I hope they kept the master tape! :-) By the way, I forgot, when relating briefly my Jane-meeting experience the other week, one interesting bit of our conversation. I told her that both times I'd interviewed her, I'd forgotten to ask her about the Tears For Fears sample. What Tears For Fears sample, I hear you ask? Well, listen to "All The Candles In the World", especially at the end. Percolating along behind the rhythm is the opening percussion loop from "Mad World"! Really! Jane looked surprised, and said "What Tears For Fears sample????" So I told her and described the sound as best I could. She didn't even know - the sample was one her engineer came up with during mixing. "Is that REALLY Tears For Fears? Oh my GOD!!!" said Jane, then smiled and turned toward me and said "See! It's like I said on stage, I learn from you, my audience. I am indebted to them!" And she proceeded to do a "We're not worthy" act a la "Wayne's World" at me! Hee. I've said it before, I'll say it again. Ms Siberry not only makes great records, she's one cool person too. :-) > Musically, Jane accompanied herself either on guitar or piano or sang > accompanied by a local pianist. My memory is horrid, but I think she That's unusual - she played her own piano in Australia... At this point I'd just like to stop and give Holly a big delayed ***HUG***, as she's over on the back screen on #Ecto at the moment and I just felt like it :-) Mike Mendelsohnises: > I met with very interesting woman named Tam Trutwin last night. > Currently she lives here but she's a Canadian "gonnabe". > Tam and I spent a few hours just playing music for each other > from our collections: it was a blast! There's so much ectoid material > she's never heard (no wonder since some of it is only available > in Germany and Australia!) and she played me lots of canadian stuff. Did you play her Margot by any chance? :-) Alan theorises about my DDDD Sib CD: > Actually, Wendy Carlos uses DDDD to mean that no analog recording > technique (i.e. using a microphone) was used to create the source. > She plays her synths, and the output of the synth goes directly onto > digital tape. This kind of recording is difficult when there are analog > instruments (such as the human voice) since humans don't have MIDI output! Inaccurate, though. The audio output of synths and samplers is, alas, analogue. Until such a time as they create a synth with pure digital bitstream output that can go through a mixing desk that works entirely in the digital domain and onto digital tape, that extra "D" won't fly. :-) I suspect the DDDD on "The Walking" was someone being over-zealous... it's certainly not DG's "4D" technique, which wasn't around when this album was done, and is primarily for orchestra or other "room" recordings, anyway... Our old friend the Mail Router said: > Unknown Microsoft mail form. Approximate representation follows. Typical bloody Microsoft - "approximate representation". Hee hee. *MY* computer sends out PERFECT representations! :-) That's all from me - hope you're all well! Back to Melbourne's Indian Summer in the middle of Autumn. I'm getting a suntan in Autumn. Go figure. :) - Anthony -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anthony Horan, Melbourne Australia - anthony@xymox.apana.org.au "All told, Under The Pink is small but likeably formed; ideal for those herbal-tea moments." - Caroline Sullivan of The Guardian reviewing the new "Victoria Amos" album. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ======================================================================== Date: Thu, 24 Mar 94 11:18:21 PST From: "John Relph" Subject: Re: Sarah in the Times Jeff writes: >Typical idiotic reviewer. His implication is that Sarah is incapable of >emoting with her voice and that she requires studio tricks to make an >impact. Anyone who's heard her live can say that she can get as intense as >she wants without any multitracking necessary. I disagree. I thought the reviewer was implying that Sarah was capable of much more, but that the PRODUCER decided that studio tricks were the only way to get emotion from her voice. It sounded to me as if the review just didn't like the PRODUCTION, and he thought that Sarah might be pretty good under all that multitracking and gloss, if only we could hear her. In which case the reviewer agrees with you. -- John ======================================================================== Date: Thu, 24 Mar 94 12:41:59 PST From: Neal Copperman Subject: irc halucinations I was on irc yesterday and had a very weird experience. Ok, that's sort of the norm in #ecto, but it seemed weirder than usual. I was on through a server that seemed to keep me in perpetual limbo. I could send out a comment that would get there in about 10 minutes, but nothing came through (except the split info). I logged on through another server and was able to participate, but left the weird one running to see if anything interesting happened. After an hour or so, someone actually showed up in that little world, but not to the rest of the people in #ecto, just in that window. A guy named Tom, who had no idea what ecto was about. When I told him about Happy and the other people of interest, this was his response. *tom* Holy shit. I met Jane Siberry, she is a close friend of my aunt I actually sung with Jane Siberry on stage several years ago in Toronto, at a place called the Groaning Board, this was before her album, the Speckeld Sky Then, I got thrown off the server and lost Tom completely. Meanwhile, the rest of #ecto didn't see any of this conversation. Perhaps I was halucinating? Neal ======================================================================== Date: Thu, 24 Mar 94 12:47:49 PST From: hanson@ast.saic.com (Jeffrey Hanson) Subject: Tori Day in L.A. Hi folks! Back to work after two wonderful days off. The Tori concert in L.A. was fabulous. Thank you Suzanne for your help in getting us in to the press conference. It was great meeting Suzanne and Jeff Wasilko for the first time. Ecto is an incredibly place. The whole day was great! One thing Neal forgot to mention--as we all went out to dinner between the press conference and the concert, we were sitting in Moose McGillicutty's and what's on the TV but the Jeapordy show that Ron was on. Unfortunately we couldn't hear it very well, but we did get to see yet another ectophile. As for the concert itself, definitely a very good experience, but I miss the old days when you could show up at the place she was playing an hour ahead of the show, go in and sit down in the front row. Oh well. Glad to see her gaining popularity but seeing her from the 30th row is not nearly as effective as seeing her from the front row. Also, I found the light show to detract, rather than enhance the music. But it was a great show none the less. But I still can't figure out why she didn't play Little Earthquakes--especially in L.A. And I would have loved to see Tear in Your Hand too--she hasn't played that either time I"ve seen her. Oh well! I hope she continues to play small theaters. Tickets may be harder to come by, but I think she really shines in small intimate theaters. Everyone should be subjected to the Tori stare at least once in their life. The other highlight of the day--I picked up the new Alison Moyet album, as well as Rhodes II. Both are great. I now have all but Rhodes I on CD. Yay! Jeff Hanson ======================================================================== Date: Thu, 24 Mar 94 16:05:48 EST From: WretchAwry Subject: Talked to Kevin... ...and told him about the Kate convention. Unfortunately, besides not having the money to go and Kevin not having a passport, the date falls right in the middle of the recording schedule. Ah well... Recording schedule? Yep, they finally got funding for the album yesterday, so dates/plans can be more firmed up now. They should go into the studio to begin recording the 15th of April (which studio is still up in the air) and they're shooting for an August 1 release date. We can't hold them to that, of course, but that's the date they *want* and that's the date they'll try for. No, I didn't get any info about song titles or anything else. They're planning on pressing an initial run of 25,000, which is quite a bit more than Equipoise's 10,000, but now that they have a pretty good distributorship in place, should go fairly quickly. _Ecto_ just went into it's forth pressing, and _RI_, _RII_ & _Rearmament_ are all into their second pressing. I asked Kevin how many they've sold so far of all the albums and he said approx. 40,000! Not bad for an unknown, unsigned singer/songwriter/musician in upstate NY :-). Kevin said they checked their computer and they are pretty sure that all the Newsletters owed have been sent out. I specifically asked about Mitch and Uli (I couldn't remember who else had a problem, but I said there were others) and Kevin said they had checked the day before because they had received Mitch's letter. It was sent out to you Mitch, but they went ahead and sent another. I don't know about you Uli, just that Kevin said that all that were supposed to go out were sent out. Sorry Uli, I don't know what to tell you. I mentioned that we were seeing Tori tonight, and Kevin said that he heard that Tori's people were trying to book the Bearsville Theater because it's somewhere that Tori *herself* asked specifically to play. I mean, Tori asked her people to set up a concert there, which they're trying to do. I imagine that it will be during the longer tour later this year. H&K live very close to that theater (Kevin is trying to set up a Happy concert there himself) so they'd certainly be at the concert. They're both still huge Tori fans, and love _Under The Pink_. Kevin said to say hi to Tori :-). I hope I can talk to Tori, if even for a few second. It's become a tradition for me to give Tori Happy CDs whenever I see her (_Warpaint_ once, _RI_ & _Equipoise_ another time) so I told Kevin I have an _Ecto_ all ready to give her if I get the chance. That's about it. Oh, the Holly Cole concert tomorrow night is sold out, but luckily Charley got us tickets in time. I don't have a tour schedule but she is playing around and I think she's heading to Los Angeles next. She'll be on the Conan O'Brien show April 14th, I believe, so it'll be a good chance for many of you to see who the hell I've been talking about :-). Seeya! Vickie ======================================================================== Date: Thu, 24 Mar 94 16:12:45 EST From: WretchAwry Subject: Re: The Kate Bush Convention + Steve writes: > At 9:30 pm 23/3/94 -0500, WretchAwry wrote: > >:-) :-) :-) Shall we start a "Send Happy to England" fund? :-) :-) :-) > Maybe what we really need is a "Send Chris 'n' Vickie to England" fund! An > ecto equivalent to the Trans-Atlantic Fan Fund! > Only half :-) Aren't you a sweetheart! Happy being there would be *far* more important though. I honestly can't imagine a more *perfect* place for her to play in her entire career. Not for financial or recognition gain, just for, well, just...because. Because it would be cool :-) Vickie ======================================================================== Date: Thu, 24 Mar 94 13:44:07 PST From: Neal Copperman Subject: Too Much Drama, Not Enough SOng Maybe the guy from the Times really doesn't know Tori (or maybe he knows her all too well), since he ended up writing a mediocre review of the Indians for that night, while a different guy was assigned the task of writing the mediocre Tori review. Tori Amos: Too Much Drama, Not Enough SOng "There are too many stars and not enough sky," sang Tori Amos during her show Tuesday at the Wadsworth THeater. The line is from "The Waitress," a sketchy song about fighting the urge toward vengeful anger, but it could be a description of the maddening nature of Amos' own artistry. On the one hand, as she sat alone at a grand piano, it was impossible not to be captivated by the boldness of her personal, confessional songs, the sometimes striking imagery and her impressive command of musical dramatics and vocal gymnastics. On the other hand, she spent so much time and effort drawing attention to those very qualities - an exaggerated convulsion to underscore the drama here, a little lip-smack to punctuate her diary-like poetics there - that the effect was spoiled. She tells us there are too many stars ... and then makes us count every one. Her confessions do offer her fans a vicarious liberation and unburdening - men and women alike Tuesday responded with knowing appreciation to her observations. Too often, though, they seem designed solely to get attention. The best moments were the most relaxed and least calculated. A chatty, spoken introduction to "Icicle," a song about physical self-discovery in the face of her repressive childhood, made the point with more ease than the song itself did. "Why must I crucify myself?" she asks in the song "Crucify," from her 1991 solo debut album. The answer in much of this show was simply: Because she can. _ Steve Hochman Playlist of the show: Sugar Crucify Icicle These Precious Things Happy Phantom Pretty GOod Year God SIlent All These Years Past The Mission Leather Waitress Smells Like Teen Spirit Me and a Gun Baker, Baker Cornflake Girl Winter China Clouds on my TOngue ======================================================================== Date: Fri, 25 Mar 1994 09:34:12 +1000 From: Ross.Alford@jcu.edu.au (Ross Alford) Subject: Re: Canada shopping list Mike Mendelson was virtually observed to type: >Here are some of the things I'll be looking for in Canada: >... >o Jane Siberry - debut -- look for original digital recording; > may only be avail. in Canada I think it may only be distributed in Canada, but it's available in some other places: I bought it in Impact Records in Canberra. It was fiendishly expensive, even by Australian standards. It is worth every penny, though, IMO. The instrumental sound is simpler than much of her recent work, but even then she was heavily into orchestrating her own voice and producing complex vocal overlays. It is also a bit more humorous/quirky in a light way than much of her later work, but I like that. Overall, I'd say this one is a must. Cheers, Ross Alford ======================================================================== Date: Thu, 24 Mar 1994 17:22:59 CST From: Subject: Smooth operator--NOT and other stories Yesterday I had the unusual experience of being the first one on both #ecto, and another IRC channel on which I often lurk (and drop in the odd _bon mot_ here and there :-) ). As such, I got channel operator status on both. Unfor- tunately, I had not the foreknowledge of how to exercise the power that goes with the mantle of being an op. Not much of anything--indeed, not anything, period--was going on on our channel at the time, so I devoted my attentions to the other one. It seemed like I was getting a good conversation going with someone, perhaps, when a couple of undersocialized individuals entered and began flooding the channel with seem- iingly infinite repeats of the same sophomoric attempts at pithiness. I enter- ed into the help command environment to find out the exact procedure for kicking them, and through their efforts or otherwise, the channel became hung. I therefore bailed out of IRC, reentered it, and rejoined both channels, but lost my op status on the other channel. After a lull, the noise resumed. I invited my partner in conversation, such as it was, to join me over on #ecto, which she did. Some other, unfamiliar people then joined us. One of them wondered what kind of channel it was, and I explained that it was usually a music channel. My invitee then said something like, "is that like ecto the Happy Rhodes list?" I answered in the affirmative, and asked what kind of music she was into. I never got a direct answer, but she said a friend of hers was on this list. Finally she left to talk to someone else off-channel, and the other squatters eventually left without doing any permanent damage. It all goes to show you that on IRC there are no strangers, only friends you haven't met. Or does it? :-) WRT the AG newsletter: thanks to Vickie for relaying the words from H&K. As it happens, my zip code is one of those investigated by the post office for alleged bad service. They may be onto something. Be that as it may, I have yet to receive anything with an AG mailing address on it. I'll continue to keep an eye on the mail. I assume I spelled my address correctly, but hope it didn't get mangles in the copying process. Compost happens, as Molly Ivins once put it :-). In memory of Luis Donaldo Colosio. Mitch ======================================================================== Date: Thu, 24 Mar 1994 19:08:40 -0500 (EST) From: ROBNPAM@delphi.com Subject: Sarah on Today Sorry if this is repeated info, but Sarah McLachlan will be on the Today Show Friday morning. Probably during the 8:30-9:00 segment...that's where they usually seem to have the musical guests. --Pamela ======================================================================== The ecto archives are on hardees.rutgers.edu in ~ftp/pub/hr. There is an INDEX file explaining what is where. Feel free to send me things you'd like to have added. -- jessica (jessica@ns1.rutgers.edu)