From: owner-chakram-refugees-digest@smoe.org (chakram-refugees-digest) To: chakram-refugees-digest@smoe.org Subject: chakram-refugees-digest V7 #159 Reply-To: chakram-refugees@smoe.org Sender: owner-chakram-refugees-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-chakram-refugees-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk chakram-refugees-digest Saturday, January 19 2008 Volume 07 : Number 159 Today's Subjects: ----------------- [chakram-refugees] Burbank ticket for sale [KTL ] [chakram-refugees] RE: Cannatas at SJN [HJJH ] [chakram-refugees] OOps! SorrySorrySorry [HJJH ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:04:15 -0900 (AKST) From: KTL Subject: [chakram-refugees] Burbank ticket for sale A friend of mine will not be able to attend the upcoming Burbank con (you know-the one starting in about eight days) and so we are flogging off her ticket. It's in row D, in the left hand section off the center aisle. Near the far end--we're trying to remember just which seat. A chance of a lifetime...grin KT ========================================================= This has been a message to the chakram-refugees list. To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@smoe.org with "unsubscribe chakram-refugees" in the message body. Contact meth@smoe.org with any questions or problems. ========================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:05:23 -0600 From: HJJH Subject: [chakram-refugees] RE: Cannatas at SJN >Many of you have been wondering why the Cannatas are not >at Mass any more. There are 2 reasons, 1) we were told that >our presence was being disruptive... Phil, sometimes you just don't tell us enough. When you say "we were told that our presence was being disruptive", it leads one to wonder just \who/ it was that said that and in what circumstances. Was it a catspaw or The Man himself? How and where did the matter come up? I won't say you \couldn't/ have been disruptive for "someone", for I had been gleefully thinking how it must be for the celebrant to see your whole tribe there together out in the congregation still sweetly singing in "his" church. As I understand canon law, there is a basic connection between a Catholic and his/her parish. Oh, we shop around as to where we go to Mass, but when it comes to basics like marriage and baptisms, first Communions and Confirmations, there is a parish to which we officially 'belong'. So one cannot help wondering if canon law would countenance the unilateral eviction of parishioners. ========================================================= This has been a message to the chakram-refugees list. To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@smoe.org with "unsubscribe chakram-refugees" in the message body. Contact meth@smoe.org with any questions or problems. ========================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:29:46 -0600 From: HJJH Subject: [chakram-refugees] OOps! SorrySorrySorry I got a mix-up in my addy list!!! ========================================================= This has been a message to the chakram-refugees list. To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@smoe.org with "unsubscribe chakram-refugees" in the message body. Contact meth@smoe.org with any questions or problems. ========================================================= ------------------------------ End of chakram-refugees-digest V7 #159 **************************************