From: owner-chakram-refugees-digest@smoe.org (chakram-refugees-digest) To: chakram-refugees-digest@smoe.org Subject: chakram-refugees-digest V7 #89 Reply-To: chakram-refugees@smoe.org Sender: owner-chakram-refugees-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-chakram-refugees-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk chakram-refugees-digest Wednesday, August 1 2007 Volume 07 : Number 089 Today's Subjects: ----------------- [chakram-refugees] ATTENTION!!! - still? [LAS ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:55:46 -0500 From: LAS Subject: [chakram-refugees] ATTENTION!!! - still? hi jackie! you said, >Hi Lilli, yes, it's hard for me to part with my old Macs that are "still >going and going and going....." ;=P And, I'm not necessarily enamored of >the new OSs, either. ;P > > i'm still on dial-up. doesn't really bother me. slow is not bad, in my book. just the system itself sometimes just takes a break in the middle of things. oh well. >Oh well....maybe when I become a *millionaire* one day.....;) LOL > > ahhhh....may you get a good well-paying job quickly : ) >- --Thanks all, for explaining [burn notice] (I guess _some_ folks are falling down on the >job about posting the news to the list, eh?!? ;) ), and I do remember >seeing only a very small snippet about it on ET, but didn't hear the >tie-in with LL or BCampbell.....Also, I'm not one of those fortunate ones >to have _cable_, either, so Burn Notice will have to go the way of BSG for >me--unwatched. ;/ [as violins play ;) ] > > > sadly, enough, my bags are packed for moving. perhaps someone on the list can help you? - ; ) >>there aren't any real roles for her to fill out in the same way and cut >>loose. like having a good bra...ya can't fill it out right if it's not >>cut right...couldn't resist that. >> >> >- --LOL! Lilli, you are getting *bolder*, aren't you?!?! ;) > > thank you! i was hoping someone would notice. yes, becoming a bit more outrageous with my humor. i figured, if this group could watch all the funny innuendo stuff on XWP, i could risk it : ) >Actually, I still see the prob as 2-pronged: not enough of those roles, >but also LL isn't choosing those roles for herself. > > you know, i read all you said, and you've said it before, and i'm beginning to agree with you. you'd make a good attorney! but one thing i understand about why she may have shied away from serious roles the last several years. the first two years OF XENA were this combination of serious and playful. but, did you see the stuff she had to play the last three seasons of xena? over the top serious. i would need a break too! perhaps someone needs to create a series just for her that would combine that serious and playful stuff. any writers out there up for the job, that could pitch it to her? be well everyone. lilli ========================================================= This has been a message to the chakram-refugees list. To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@smoe.org with "unsubscribe chakram-refugees" in the message body. Contact meth@smoe.org with any questions or problems. ========================================================= ------------------------------ End of chakram-refugees-digest V7 #89 *************************************