From: owner-chakram-refugees-digest@smoe.org (chakram-refugees-digest) To: chakram-refugees-digest@smoe.org Subject: chakram-refugees-digest V3 #311 Reply-To: chakram-refugees@smoe.org Sender: owner-chakram-refugees-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-chakram-refugees-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk chakram-refugees-digest Friday, October 17 2003 Volume 03 : Number 311 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: [chakram-refugees] OS: Charmed and Tarzan ["Mark B." Subject: Re: [chakram-refugees] OS: Charmed and Tarzan H.J.J. Hewitt wrote: >>--Actually, I disagree with Cheryl on this. I was disappointed in how LL >>handled the role. > > > Me, too. And as Jackie said, too many of Kathleen's actions/reactions > seemed artificial or ambiguous. I didn't feel any of the spark Lucy had > even in the early travel shows she hosted. I was looking for it... but guess it was wishful thinking that I saw it. I'm in the process of rewatching the ep tonight. In fact, the one character who > struck me as "alive", and vital, and motivated, much as I disliked him, was > Michael. (And even wounded, Tarzan's inability to hold onto Michael makes > his having so \effortlessly/ lifted Jane back up over the parapet in the > pilot look all the more ridiculous.) Me thinks that blood was kinda slippery . I was mixed about him. He seemed good for Jane, but he had a dark side that came out when he was trying to capture Tarzan. In his favor though, I think it was not specifically malicious towards Tarzan -- merely protective towards Jane as 'his'. Does that make him 'wrong'??? Mark ========================================================= This has been a message to the chakram-refugees list. To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@smoe.org with "unsubscribe chakram-refugees" in the message body. Contact meth@smoe.org with any questions or problems. ========================================================= ------------------------------ End of chakram-refugees-digest V3 #311 **************************************