From: owner-chakram-refugees-digest@smoe.org (chakram-refugees-digest) To: chakram-refugees-digest@smoe.org Subject: chakram-refugees-digest V3 #156 Reply-To: chakram-refugees@smoe.org Sender: owner-chakram-refugees-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-chakram-refugees-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk chakram-refugees-digest Friday, June 6 2003 Volume 03 : Number 156 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: [chakram-refugees] Many Happy Returns [cr ] Re: [chakram-refugees] Re: Xena's Braging rights [cr ] Re: [chakram-refugees] The Chakram ["S. Wilson" ] Re: [chakram-refugees] Re: Xena's Braging rights [IfeRae@aol.com] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 08:46:55 +1200 From: cr Subject: Re: [chakram-refugees] Many Happy Returns On Wednesday 04 Jun 2003 1:12 pm, Cheryl Ande wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "cr" > > "We'll never see eye to eye.... I liked SP waaaaay better than MHR.... " > > Well have the fun is not seeing eye to eye. As for not liking MHR comedy > is very subjective thing. Anyway I suspect you didn't like for the very > reason I did like it - it was a kind of subtexty episode. I actually > thought that in this episode X & G did act more like best friends than > other episodes. I think we saw that these two women really liked each > other and enjoyed being around each other. I don't think that has anything > at all to do with subtext. Actually, now you mention it, that's so. It isn't really very 'subtexty' at all. But no, that's not why I don't care for it. It's just that it doesn't contain anything that really excites me. > The Sappho poem yes is subtextual but actually > if you asked Sappho to write a poem for your best friend I guess it would > always turn out to be subtextual whether you as the asker meant it to be - > tha's a bit confusing but I know what I mean. Strangely enough, I know what you mean too. Or at least, I know what I think you mean. Or I think I know what you mean. Or... > Anway on to Soul Possession and good luck pursuading me about it's merits. > > CherylA Soul Possession, OTOH, is arguably *much* more subtexty than MHR. cr ========================================================= This has been a message to the chakram-refugees list. To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@smoe.org with "unsubscribe chakram-refugees" in the message body. Contact meth@smoe.org with any questions or problems. ========================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 08:53:56 +1200 From: cr Subject: Re: [chakram-refugees] Re: Xena's Braging rights On Wednesday 04 Jun 2003 5:01 pm, IfeRae@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 6/3/2003 7:15:14 PM Central Daylight Time, > > Xwpacolyte@aol.com writes: > > In a message dated 6/1/03 3:56:10 PM Central Daylight Time, > > cande@sunlink.net > > writes: > > > > <> > > > > This thread that will not die has gone on so long now that even I have to > > come out of lurkdom to comment. >> > (snippity snip) > > Gods, I love this list! >> > > Uh huh. Doesn't it drive you crazy? > > - Ife Errrm, you guys have been debating *one line* out of a low-rating ep that isn't even bad enough to be on anybody's hate list for *two weeks*..... now that is truly obsessive. I'm impressed. cr ========================================================= This has been a message to the chakram-refugees list. To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@smoe.org with "unsubscribe chakram-refugees" in the message body. Contact meth@smoe.org with any questions or problems. ========================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 08:58:10 -0500 From: "S. Wilson" Subject: Re: [chakram-refugees] The Chakram At 12:02 AM 6/4/2003 -0500, Daniel T. Miller wrote: >On Tue, 27 May 2003 08:51:56 -0500 Stephanie Wilson >writes: > > > > Ohh... here all this time I thought it was more like in Been There, > > Done > > That, with the angles and the ricochets and the planning and the > > plotting! > > .... > > > > S. > > (did anyone else just think Simpsons?) > > ========================================================= > >Yikes. Xena an ancestor of Professor Frink? > >Well, she is a genius (the inventing and doctoring and so on). >And wow--all that geometry in her head in Been There Done That. >Perhaps there was a marriage between a descendent's of Joxer >and Xena's brother. > >Does Frink have a southern aunt who was a great scholar >that turned to a life of adventure in the late 1930's? Hehe. I was wondering if I was the biggest geek on the list for a moment. Now at least I know I'm a big geek, but I am not alone. *s* ;) S. ========================================================= This has been a message to the chakram-refugees list. To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@smoe.org with "unsubscribe chakram-refugees" in the message body. Contact meth@smoe.org with any questions or problems. ========================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 12:52:06 EDT From: IfeRae@aol.com Subject: Re: [chakram-refugees] Re: Xena's Braging rights In a message dated 6/5/03 2:29:41 AM Central Daylight Time, cr@orcon.net.nz writes: << Errrm, you guys have been debating *one line* out of a low-rating ep that isn't even bad enough to be on anybody's hate list for *two weeks*..... now that is truly obsessive. I'm impressed. >> "You guys"? Did I not see you in the fray as well? And aren't we by definition "truly obsessive"? Isn't it our duty to find the gems, paradoxes, controversies, etc. buried in even the most obscure of eps? (Except the Xenalite ones. I abdicate my duty with some -- tho not all -- of those.) Personally, I'm more impressed with the discussion of the personality, emotions, spirituality, destiny, properties, abilities, loyalties, etc. attributed to what I once saw as simply a potentially lethal metal disk. - -- Ife ========================================================= This has been a message to the chakram-refugees list. To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@smoe.org with "unsubscribe chakram-refugees" in the message body. Contact meth@smoe.org with any questions or problems. ========================================================= ------------------------------ End of chakram-refugees-digest V3 #156 **************************************