From: owner-basia-digest@smoe.org (basia-digest) To: basia-digest@smoe.org Subject: basia-digest V8 #152 Reply-To: basia@smoe.org Sender: owner-basia-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-basia-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk X-To-Unsubscribe: Send mail to "basia-digest-request@smoe.org" X-To-Unsubscribe: with "unsubscribe" as the body. basia-digest Friday, October 3 2003 Volume 08 : Number 152 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: Happy Birthday, Basia! ["K. S." ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 19:29:00 +0000 From: "K. S." Subject: Re: Happy Birthday, Basia! Something is not totally correct with your math:-) Just kidding. But as she is really 49 now that's mean she was born in1954 - and that's for sure as it is the same year as my mother was born, thought diffrent day. Well, recently I am also a lurker:-) greetings from Poland Krystyna >From: "Desianto F. W." >Reply-To: basia@smoe.org >To: pages@paxety.com, basia@smoe.org >Subject: Re: Happy Birthday, Basia! >Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:07:13 -0700 (PDT) > > >Or maybe she is 34?....(just kidding..:-D..) >Some also said that she was born in 1954. If it's >true, >she is 49 now. But IMHO, 1959 is the correct year. > >Desianto F. W. > >============================= >--- Paxety Pages wrote: > > > > Her age has been in a bit of dispute. I belive 44 is > > correct, but some > > published figures put her birthdate as 1956 - making > > her 47. > > un abrazo, > > juan > > > > > > > > So how OLD is Basia, anyway? Isn't she 44 now? > > > > > > Joe in Baltimore > > > > >__________________________________ >Do you Yahoo!? >The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search >http://shopping.yahoo.com _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus ------------------------------ End of basia-digest V8 #152 ***************************