From: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org (angry-psychos-digest) To: angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Subject: angry-psychos-digest V7 #330 Reply-To: angry-psychos@smoe.org Sender: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk X-To-Unsubscribe: Send mail to "angry-psychos-digest-request@smoe.org" X-To-Unsubscribe: with "unsubscribe" as the body. angry-psychos-digest Thursday, December 5 2002 Volume 07 : Number 330 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Quote about the Mexican Vogue cover and modeling [VR5SBloom@aol.com] NPR...I knew the Stones were strange...but this is downright outre! [indi] Re: NPR...I knew the Stones were strange...but this is downright outre! [] Hello,let's be friends [adahlfin ] POE Store Auctions ["Ice Princess" ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 03:01:50 EST From: VR5SBloom@aol.com Subject: Quote about the Mexican Vogue cover and modeling Just thought I'd post this bit about the Mexican Vogue Poe was on the cover of that's being auctioned... Grid [Utah zine] 1996 [unknown month] "Caught In The Poe" interview by Merkley photos by Tyler Gourley [begin excerpt] ME: What a pro. But I guess you used to model. At least that's what it says in your bio . . . POE: That is complete bullsh%t . . . f%cking bullsh%t. Why does it say that in there? We have to get rid of that. I have a friend much like yourself who took a bunch of pictures of me and one of them somehow ended up on the cover of Mexican Vogue. ME: Yeah, that happens to me a lot. POE: It was pretty cool and everything but now I have to live down this "Oh yeah, and she was a model" bullsh%t which just isn't true. I was never a model nor would I be. Too boring. [end excerpt] - --Michele ShellE Productions: http://www.shellE.org/ Home of PsYcHovixen, Poe documents (including the Poe discography), Garbage and Poe trading, eXej, 12 Rounds, and Exploration Z: A Haunted House Of Leaves Alternate Universe ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 11:42:35 -0700 (MST) From: indigofaerie Subject: NPR...I knew the Stones were strange...but this is downright outre! On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, angry-psychos-digest wrote: > > angry-psychos-digest Wednesday, November 27 2002 Volume 07 : Number 324 > > > > > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:36:47 EST > From: KrodKnid@aol.com > Subject: NPR...I knew the Stones were strange...but this is downright outre! > > At age 47, the Rolling Stones' bassist, Bill Wyman, > began a relationship with 13-year old Mandy Smith, > with her mother's blessing. Six years later, > they were married, but the marriage only lasted a year. > Not long after, Bill's 30-year-old son Stephen > married Mandy's mother, age 46. > That made Stephen a stepfather to his former stepmother. > If Bill and Mandy had remained married, > Stephen would have been his father's father-in-law > and his own grandpa. > Actually... it's true that Stephen would have been a stepfather to his former stepmother, but an in-law relationship wouldn't constitute a new grandfather.. a person must have his own children, and these children must have children, in order for this person to be a grandfather. Even stretching the definition, to say that his new wife's daughter is his own daughter and not a stepdaughter, this woman is not a mother herself, and therefore he has no grandchildren. You'd have to make two stretches: that his wife's daughter is his own child, and that his wife's daughter is in fact his own mother and not his stepmother. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 19:12:45 EST From: KrodKnid@aol.com Subject: Re: NPR...I knew the Stones were strange...but this is downright outre! In a message dated 12/4/2002 1:44:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, ebreeze@Colorado.EDU writes: > Actually... it's true that Stephen would have been a stepfather to his > former stepmother, but an in-law relationship wouldn't constitute a new > grandfather.. a person must have his own children, and these children must > have children, in order for this person to be a grandfather. Even > stretching the definition, to say that his new wife's daughter is his own > daughter and not a stepdaughter, this woman is not a mother herself, and > therefore he has no grandchildren. You'd have to make two stretches: that > his wife's daughter is his own child, and that his wife's daughter is in > fact his own mother and not his stepmother. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Hahahahahahaha...amazing. This, of course, is much less strange than the > other way:-) ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 21:40:56 -0800 From: adahlfin Subject: Hello,let's be friends ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 21:45:50 -0800 From: "Ice Princess" Subject: POE Store Auctions Hey All There is some really cool stuff in these auctions, and some new jackets if anyone's interested. Just wanted to let everyone know :) http://user.auctions.shopping.yahoo.com/show/auctions?userID=poestuff&u=%3apoestuff ~Shelley _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ------------------------------ End of angry-psychos-digest V7 #330 ***********************************