From: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org (angry-psychos-digest) To: angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Subject: angry-psychos-digest V6 #430 Reply-To: angry-psychos@smoe.org Sender: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk X-To-Unsubscribe: Send mail to "angry-psychos-digest-request@smoe.org" X-To-Unsubscribe: with "unsubscribe" as the body. angry-psychos-digest Wednesday, September 26 2001 Volume 06 : Number 430 Today's Subjects: ----------------- RE: NPR-check this out...HOAX [Jennifer Cook ] RE: NPR Re: Don't give peace a chance? ["Brian Brantley" ] Re: NPR Re: Don't give peace a chance? [Jim Sullivan ] Re: Goes w/ Vote for Poe on CTN [angie ] NPR-(don't) check this out ["jayson g" ] POE MERCHANDISE [angie ] Re: POE MERCHANDISE [Cyberfan Corporation ] Re: NPR-check this out...HOAX [Finedragonfly7@aol.com] RE: NPR-check this out...HOAX [Jennifer Cook ] NPR-check this out...HOAX ["jayson g" ] Re: NPR: Finished HOL [Beener2100@aol.com] NPR Air [Spidersrcute2@aol.com] Re: NPR-check this out... ["Sarah Lippert" ] NPR AIR [Spidersrcute2@aol.com] I just called KZON Phoenix... [Cyberfan Corporation ] Re: NPR AIR [LiveThruThisVow@aol.com] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:43:37 -0500 From: Jennifer Cook Subject: RE: NPR-check this out...HOAX Let me add something... I mentioned being bothered by receiving tons of e-mail... The e-mail from the AP's doesn't bother me. I knew when I signed on that I would be receiving quite a few e-mails... - -----Original Message----- From: Jennifer Cook [mailto:JCook@dpict.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:40 AM To: angry-psychos@smoe.org Subject: RE: NPR-check this out...HOAX Okay, here's my rant... Technology is a wondrous thing, especially when it can enhance our daily lives like e-mail and the internet do... BUT, I'm am so freakin' tired of the stupid e-mail forwards and hoaxes. Especially, after the terrible tragedy that just happened. I have been so bombarded by e-mails from friends and co-workers, that are SO STUPID... I don't care if someone could see the devil's face in the dust clouds when the WTC's collapsed... Yeah, well I saw many a duck and tugboats in the clouds when I was a kid looking up into the sky. I really don't care that someone had so much time on their hands that they created some stupid faux flight number that when put into Wingding font, will "freak you out"... OOOOHHHH SPOOKY! I just received another one... Some guy is standing atop the WTC and the plane is headed straight for them. WHATEVER! Are we that gullible? Do we really need 10 million "inspirational" forwards to make it through the day. Yeah, I actually enjoyed a couple of them and they made me smile a little, but when I receive one after another after another after another... it gets a little old. If people are so concerned, stop forwarding e-mails and do something to help. Anyone else agree? Okay, I'm done with my little rant for now... Whew, do I feel better! Love to all the AP's and even more to our Poe. Jennifer :-) - -----Original Message----- From: Brian Brantley [mailto:rbbrantley@steelspaninc.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:08 AM To: angry-psychos@smoe.org Subject: Re: NPR-check this out...HOAX Think about this folks. That is no flight number that I have ever heard. The format is all wrong. THIS IS A HOAX!!!!!! It just ain't true....... Ignorance is fueled by the masses........ - ----- Original Message ----- From: "*Miss Understood*" To: ; Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:21 PM Subject: Re: NPR-check this out... I thought the flight numbers of the planes that crashed into the Trade Center Towers were 11 and 175...not Q33...so where did that number come from? Otherwise, it is freaky and not cool at all. Melissa "If love is the answer, can you please rephrase the question?" _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:00:46 -0400 From: "Brian Brantley" Subject: RE: NPR Re: Don't give peace a chance? This article made more sense than any argument I've heard so far. Pacifism is a liberty given by the blood of American servicemen in wars past and present. You have the right to disagree because some marine, sailor or soldier in some distant place gave his life protecting your liberties. So, voice your opinion!!!!! Scream it loud and clear. BUT NEVER FORGET WHO GAVE YOU THAT RIGHT. It is the servicemen who with bear the load to defend your freedom. We do this willingly. We know the consequences. We don't need your pity. Just don't spit on me when I come home. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "John A. Bell" To: Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:05 AM Subject: Re: NPR Re: Don't give peace a chance? Well, it is true. If you read further down at Orwell's argument, it makes sense. Besides which, in the current situation, I have yet to hear a feasible alternative to war. Just my two cents. - -jb - ----- Original Message ----- From: aNfrey cHeng To: aNgRy pSycHos Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:53 AM Subject: NPR Re: Don't give peace a chance? > > okay, this article angered me. the author's logic only makes sense with the > assumption that a person must side either for their nation or for whomever's > attacking. what gives? it is not a question of WHO but rather a WHAT. i > myself am a pacifist and i'm less concerned about who is practicing violence > than with the fact that it's happening around the world, affecting us. i do > not support the war efforts, nor do i not support terrorist efforts. if > another human being can't feel that personal responsibility to care for > another life rather than hurt it, then something is terribly wrong. > > to those who read this, i just woke up so it might not make much sense. i > apologize. this article made me feel not well, and to feel better i felt > like i had to voice some sort of opinion. i'll wake up soon enough. > > peace, > anfrey ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:31:15 -0700 From: Jim Sullivan Subject: NPR Re: Don't give peace a chance? Don't get me wrong, I am definitely in support of taking swift action against Afghanistan for many reasons, but the logic behind the argument in this article is faulty. Just because someone is a pacifist doesn't make them evil. I'm sick of the propaganda that tries to make us hate pacifists. It is obvious that they do have reasons for believing what they do, and we should all respect that. Pacifists are merely thinking of the many more lives that will be lost, and are very optimistic that there may be another way to solve the problem without a war. They may be wrong (or maybe they actually are right), but that doesn't make them evil. I'm sure if pacifists wanted to, they could write an article outlining some fancy logic that would "prove" why people sho support an attack are "evil" too. I'm getting very sick of people who won't tolerate another point of view, and that article really pissed me off. Oh, and Jen, I am equally sick of those stupid forewards about the "freaky" things you get when you add up the numbers and get 11, and the visions in the smoke clouds, etc. It seems like some people have nothing better to do with their time than invent elaborate hoaxes. In my opinion it's very disrespectful to invent a hoax about such an important issue, especially one in which so many lives were lost. Jim Brian Brantley wrote: >This article made more sense than any argument I've heard so far. Pacifism >is a liberty given by the blood of American servicemen in wars past and >present. You have the right to disagree because some marine, sailor or >soldier in some distant place gave his life protecting your liberties. So, >voice your opinion!!!!! Scream it loud and clear. BUT NEVER FORGET WHO >GAVE YOU THAT RIGHT. It is the servicemen who with bear the load to defend >your freedom. We do this willingly. We know the consequences. We don't >need your pity. Just don't spit on me when I come home. > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "John A. Bell" >To: >Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:05 AM >Subject: Re: NPR Re: Don't give peace a chance? > > > >Well, it is true. If you read further down at Orwell's argument, it makes >sense. > >Besides which, in the current situation, I have yet to hear a feasible >alternative to war. > >Just my two cents. > >-jb > >----- Original Message ----- >From: aNfrey cHeng >To: aNgRy pSycHos >Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:53 AM >Subject: NPR Re: Don't give peace a chance? > > >>okay, this article angered me. the author's logic only makes sense with >> >the > >>assumption that a person must side either for their nation or for >> >whomever's > >>attacking. what gives? it is not a question of WHO but rather a WHAT. i >>myself am a pacifist and i'm less concerned about who is practicing >> >violence > >>than with the fact that it's happening around the world, affecting us. i >> >do > >>not support the war efforts, nor do i not support terrorist efforts. if >>another human being can't feel that personal responsibility to care for >>another life rather than hurt it, then something is terribly wrong. >> >>to those who read this, i just woke up so it might not make much sense. i >>apologize. this article made me feel not well, and to feel better i felt >>like i had to voice some sort of opinion. i'll wake up soon enough. >> >>peace, >>anfrey ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:43:11 -0400 From: "John A. Bell" Subject: Re: NPR Re: Don't give peace a chance? Wow. You read a lot into things. No one said pacifism was evil. I am very tolerant of other points of view. And I am all for avoiding war when there is a FEASIBLE alternative. However, in this case, one has not yet been presented. - -jb - ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim Sullivan Cc: Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:31 PM Subject: NPR Re: Don't give peace a chance? > > Don't get me wrong, I am definitely in support of taking swift action > against Afghanistan for many reasons, but the logic behind the argument > in this article is faulty. Just because someone is a pacifist doesn't > make them evil. I'm sick of the propaganda that tries to make us hate > pacifists. It is obvious that they do have reasons for believing what > they do, and we should all respect that. Pacifists are merely thinking > of the many more lives that will be lost, and are very optimistic that > there may be another way to solve the problem without a war. They may > be wrong (or maybe they actually are right), but that doesn't make them > evil. I'm sure if pacifists wanted to, they could write an article > outlining some fancy logic that would "prove" why people sho support an > attack are "evil" too. I'm getting very sick of people who won't > tolerate another point of view, and that article really pissed me off. > > Oh, and Jen, I am equally sick of those stupid forewards about the > "freaky" things you get when you add up the numbers and get 11, and the > visions in the smoke clouds, etc. It seems like some people have > nothing better to do with their time than invent elaborate hoaxes. In > my opinion it's very disrespectful to invent a hoax about such an > important issue, especially one in which so many lives were lost. > > Jim > > > Brian Brantley wrote: > > >This article made more sense than any argument I've heard so far. Pacifism > >is a liberty given by the blood of American servicemen in wars past and > >present. You have the right to disagree because some marine, sailor or > >soldier in some distant place gave his life protecting your liberties. So, > >voice your opinion!!!!! Scream it loud and clear. BUT NEVER FORGET WHO > >GAVE YOU THAT RIGHT. It is the servicemen who with bear the load to defend > >your freedom. We do this willingly. We know the consequences. We don't > >need your pity. Just don't spit on me when I come home. > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "John A. Bell" > >To: > >Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:05 AM > >Subject: Re: NPR Re: Don't give peace a chance? > > > > > > > >Well, it is true. If you read further down at Orwell's argument, it makes > >sense. > > > >Besides which, in the current situation, I have yet to hear a feasible > >alternative to war. > > > >Just my two cents. > > > >-jb > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: aNfrey cHeng > >To: aNgRy pSycHos > >Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:53 AM > >Subject: NPR Re: Don't give peace a chance? > > > > > >>okay, this article angered me. the author's logic only makes sense with > >> > >the > > > >>assumption that a person must side either for their nation or for > >> > >whomever's > > > >>attacking. what gives? it is not a question of WHO but rather a WHAT. i > >>myself am a pacifist and i'm less concerned about who is practicing > >> > >violence > > > >>than with the fact that it's happening around the world, affecting us. i > >> > >do > > > >>not support the war efforts, nor do i not support terrorist efforts. if > >>another human being can't feel that personal responsibility to care for > >>another life rather than hurt it, then something is terribly wrong. > >> > >>to those who read this, i just woke up so it might not make much sense. i > >>apologize. this article made me feel not well, and to feel better i felt > >>like i had to voice some sort of opinion. i'll wake up soon enough. > >> > >>peace, > >>anfrey ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:47:54 -0700 From: Jim Sullivan Subject: Re: NPR Re: Don't give peace a chance? Oh, sorry. I didn't mean to imply that you said pacifism was evil. I was referring to the last line in the actual article, which clearly did say that pacifism is evil. Jim > _____What's Your Opinion?_____ >. . . Pacifist Claptrap >By Michael Kelly >Washington Post Wednesday, September 26, 2001; Page A25 > >Pacifists are not serious people, although they devoutly >believe they are, and their arguments are not being >taken seriously at the moment. Yet it is worth taking >seriously, and in advance of need, the pacifists and >their appeal. > >It is worth it, first of all, because the idea of peace >is inherently attractive; and the more war there is, the >more attractive the idea becomes. Second, it is worth it >because the reactionary left-liberal crowd in America >and in Europe has already staked out its ground here: >What happened to America is America's fault, the fruits >of foolish arrogance and greedy imperialism, racism, >colonialism, etc., etc. From this rises an argument that >the resulting war is also an exercise in arrogance and >imperialism, etc., and not deserving of support. This >argument will be made with greater fearlessness as the >first memories of the 7,000 murdered recede. Third, it >is worth it because the American foreign policy >establishment has all the heart for war of a titmouse, >and not one of your braver titmice. The first faint, let- >us-be-reasonable bleats can even now be heard: Yes, we >must do something, but is an escalation of aggression >really the right thing? Mightn't it just make matters >ever so much worse? > >Pacifists see themselves as obviously on the side of a >higher morality, and there is a surface appeal to this >notion, even for those who dismiss pacifism as >hopelessly naive. The pacifists' argument is rooted >entirely in this appeal: Two wrongs don't make a right; >violence only begets more violence. > >There can be truth in the pacifists' claim to the moral >high ground, notably in the case of a war that is waged >for manifestly evil purposes. So, for instance, a German >citizen who declined to fight for the Nazi cause could >be seen (although not likely by his family and friends) >as occupying the moral position. But in the situation >where one's nation has been attacked -- a situation such >as we are now in -- pacifism is, inescapably and >profoundly, immoral. Indeed, in the case of this >specific situation, pacifism is on the side of the >murderers, and it is on the side of letting them murder >again. > >In 1942 George Orwell wrote this, in Partisan Review, of >Great Britain's pacifists: > >"Pacifism is objectively pro-Fascist. This is elementary >common sense. If you hamper the war effort of one side >you automatically help out that of the other. Nor is >there any real way of remaining outside such a war as >the present one. In practice, 'he that is not with me is >against me.' " > >England's pacifists howled, but Orwell's logic was >implacable. The Nazis wished the British to not fight. >If the British did not fight, the Nazis would conquer >Britain. The British pacifists also wished the British >to not fight. The British pacifists, therefore, were on >the side of a Nazi victory over Britain. They were >objectively pro-Fascist. > >An essentially identical logic obtains now. Organized >terrorist groups have attacked America. These groups >wish the Americans to not fight. The American pacifists >wish the Americans to not fight. If the Americans do not >fight, the terrorists will attack America again. And now >we know such attacks can kill many thousands of >Americans. The American pacifists, therefore, are on the >side of future mass murders of Americans. They are >objectively pro-terrorist. > >There is no way out of this reasoning. No honest person >can pretend that the groups that attacked America will, >if let alone, not attack again. Nor can any honest >person say that this attack is not at least reasonably >likely to kill thousands upon thousands of innocent >people. To not fight in this instance is to let the >attackers live to attack and murder again; to be a >pacifist in this instance is to accept and, in practice, >support this outcome. > >As President Bush said of nations: A war has been >declared; you are either on one side or another. You are >either for doing what is necessary to capture or kill >those who control and fund and harbor the terrorists, or >you are for not doing this. If you are for not doing >this, you are for allowing the terrorists to continue >their attacks on America. You are saying, in fact: I >believe that it is better to allow more Americans -- >perhaps a great many more -- to be murdered than to >capture or kill the murderers. > >That is the pacifists' position, and it is evil. > John A. Bell wrote: >Wow. You read a lot into things. No one said pacifism was evil. > >I am very tolerant of other points of view. And I am all for avoiding war >when there is a FEASIBLE alternative. > >However, in this case, one has not yet been presented. > >-jb ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:54:04 -0400 From: "John A. Bell" Subject: Re: NPR Re: Don't give peace a chance? I had managed to miss that line. All apologies. - ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim Sullivan To: John A. Bell Cc: Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:47 PM Subject: Re: NPR Re: Don't give peace a chance? > Oh, sorry. I didn't mean to imply that you said pacifism was evil. I > was referring to the last line in the actual article, which clearly did > say that pacifism is evil. > > Jim > > > > > _____What's Your Opinion?_____ > >. . . Pacifist Claptrap > >By Michael Kelly > >Washington Post Wednesday, September 26, 2001; Page A25 > > > >Pacifists are not serious people, although they devoutly > >believe they are, and their arguments are not being > >taken seriously at the moment. Yet it is worth taking > >seriously, and in advance of need, the pacifists and > >their appeal. > > > >It is worth it, first of all, because the idea of peace > >is inherently attractive; and the more war there is, the > >more attractive the idea becomes. Second, it is worth it > >because the reactionary left-liberal crowd in America > >and in Europe has already staked out its ground here: > >What happened to America is America's fault, the fruits > >of foolish arrogance and greedy imperialism, racism, > >colonialism, etc., etc. From this rises an argument that > >the resulting war is also an exercise in arrogance and > >imperialism, etc., and not deserving of support. This > >argument will be made with greater fearlessness as the > >first memories of the 7,000 murdered recede. Third, it > >is worth it because the American foreign policy > >establishment has all the heart for war of a titmouse, > >and not one of your braver titmice. The first faint, let- > >us-be-reasonable bleats can even now be heard: Yes, we > >must do something, but is an escalation of aggression > >really the right thing? Mightn't it just make matters > >ever so much worse? > > > >Pacifists see themselves as obviously on the side of a > >higher morality, and there is a surface appeal to this > >notion, even for those who dismiss pacifism as > >hopelessly naive. The pacifists' argument is rooted > >entirely in this appeal: Two wrongs don't make a right; > >violence only begets more violence. > > > >There can be truth in the pacifists' claim to the moral > >high ground, notably in the case of a war that is waged > >for manifestly evil purposes. So, for instance, a German > >citizen who declined to fight for the Nazi cause could > >be seen (although not likely by his family and friends) > >as occupying the moral position. But in the situation > >where one's nation has been attacked -- a situation such > >as we are now in -- pacifism is, inescapably and > >profoundly, immoral. Indeed, in the case of this > >specific situation, pacifism is on the side of the > >murderers, and it is on the side of letting them murder > >again. > > > >In 1942 George Orwell wrote this, in Partisan Review, of > >Great Britain's pacifists: > > > >"Pacifism is objectively pro-Fascist. This is elementary > >common sense. If you hamper the war effort of one side > >you automatically help out that of the other. Nor is > >there any real way of remaining outside such a war as > >the present one. In practice, 'he that is not with me is > >against me.' " > > > >England's pacifists howled, but Orwell's logic was > >implacable. The Nazis wished the British to not fight. > >If the British did not fight, the Nazis would conquer > >Britain. The British pacifists also wished the British > >to not fight. The British pacifists, therefore, were on > >the side of a Nazi victory over Britain. They were > >objectively pro-Fascist. > > > >An essentially identical logic obtains now. Organized > >terrorist groups have attacked America. These groups > >wish the Americans to not fight. The American pacifists > >wish the Americans to not fight. If the Americans do not > >fight, the terrorists will attack America again. And now > >we know such attacks can kill many thousands of > >Americans. The American pacifists, therefore, are on the > >side of future mass murders of Americans. They are > >objectively pro-terrorist. > > > >There is no way out of this reasoning. No honest person > >can pretend that the groups that attacked America will, > >if let alone, not attack again. Nor can any honest > >person say that this attack is not at least reasonably > >likely to kill thousands upon thousands of innocent > >people. To not fight in this instance is to let the > >attackers live to attack and murder again; to be a > >pacifist in this instance is to accept and, in practice, > >support this outcome. > > > >As President Bush said of nations: A war has been > >declared; you are either on one side or another. You are > >either for doing what is necessary to capture or kill > >those who control and fund and harbor the terrorists, or > >you are for not doing this. If you are for not doing > >this, you are for allowing the terrorists to continue > >their attacks on America. You are saying, in fact: I > >believe that it is better to allow more Americans -- > >perhaps a great many more -- to be murdered than to > >capture or kill the murderers. > > > >That is the pacifists' position, and it is evil. > > > > > > John A. Bell wrote: > > >Wow. You read a lot into things. No one said pacifism was evil. > > > >I am very tolerant of other points of view. And I am all for avoiding war > >when there is a FEASIBLE alternative. > > > >However, in this case, one has not yet been presented. > > > >-jb ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:48:13 -0400 From: angie Subject: Re: Goes w/ Vote for Poe on CTN She's not on the list--but should be.... (which we can push for). I am very surprised that they don't promote their own shows on the site....I was told however that it's nearly impossible to get any more detail on the broadcast of the games because the schedule changes too often. Why that would be, I'm uncertain (I don't know if they do a lot of surprise live stuff or what-never watched CTN). It would be nice to let everyone know when to tune in if they have access to the network....all we have is..."repeatedly broadcast starting September 25th" and THAT's not even on the site. Anyway....let's tell em' to get Poe on there...and more about their programming....appease the viewers-elate the viewers AND the surfers. Cyberfan Corporation wrote: > I can't find any place to actuall "vote" for POE > > do you have a direct link? > > *************************************************** > > JK/// > Jarrod Kniff > President - Cyberfan Corporation > jarrod@cyberfan.com > > *************************************************** > > "One important key to success is self-confidence. > An important key to self-confidence is preparation." > -- Arthur Ashe > > *************************************************** > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, angie wrote: > > > > > She's not on the list at http://www.collegetelevision.com/ (so let's > > get her on there) > > Tell them you're gonna watch the GRAVITY GAMES THAT SHE CO MC'd and that > > it would make sense to have her available to vote for as a favorite on > > their site. > > Contact > > Atlanta > > One Capital City Plaza > > Suite 1500 > > 3350 Peachtree Road > > Atlanta, GA 30326 > > (404) 256-4444 > > (800) 256-1636 > > (404) 843-8842 fax > > > > > > Chicago > > 213 West Institute Place > > Suite 302 > > Chicago, IL 60610 > > (312) 932-0720 > > (877) 800-4483 > > (312) 932-0727 fax > > > > > > Los Angeles > > 2041 Rosecrans Avenue > > Suite 235 > > El Segundo, CA 90245 > > (310) 606-6100 > > (800) 486-4636 > > (310) 606-6101 fax > > > > > > New York > > 32 East 57th Street > > 11-12 Floors > > New York, NY 10022 > > (212) 980-6600 > > (800) 586-4636 > > (212) 755-5992 fax ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:00:35 -0500 From: "jayson g" Subject: NPR-(don't) check this out I agree 100%! All this junkmail on the attacks does nothing for me but cheapen the true meaning of pride, patriotism, concern, and healing that our country feels right now. It seems none of my friends understand this because every time I open my mailbox there's twenty of these "check this out"/"pass it on" letters that I'm completely sick of seeing. If someone sends me an interesting CNN article, then cool, but these pictures of crying eagles and "letters to the terrorists" get nothing but insta-delete. I LOVE my country. I HATE cheesy junk mail. >Okay, here's my rant... > >Technology is a wondrous thing, especially when it can enhance our daily >lives like e-mail and the internet do... BUT, I'm am so freakin' tired of >the stupid e-mail forwards and hoaxes. Especially, after the terrible >tragedy that just happened... _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:13:35 -0400 From: angie Subject: POE MERCHANDISE Keep the ideas coming to the message board http://www.p-o-e.com/ubb/Forum11/HTML/000001.html These ideas aren't just for fun. Be part of the first wave of Poe goodies. Thanks, Ang ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 19:41:18 +0000 (GMT) From: Cyberfan Corporation Subject: Re: POE MERCHANDISE http://psychothreads.poe.st all the merchandise thats fit to print... *************************************************** JK/// Jarrod Kniff President - Cyberfan Corporation jarrod@cyberfan.com *************************************************** "One important key to success is self-confidence. An important key to self-confidence is preparation." -- Arthur Ashe *************************************************** On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, angie wrote: > > Keep the ideas coming to the message board > http://www.p-o-e.com/ubb/Forum11/HTML/000001.html > > These ideas aren't just for fun. Be part of the first wave of Poe > goodies. > > Thanks, > Ang ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:00:07 EDT From: Finedragonfly7@aol.com Subject: Re: NPR-check this out...HOAX Hello to everyone.. And for those who are complaining that people are sending emails about Erie facts and so on..WHY dont u just press delete. I myself like hearing POE stuff, and I surely hear tons on NPR things, but there are stated as NPR so if you have a problem just delete takes 2 seconds.. Or get the digest for of this list... Also, I wasn't the one who created that word thing, I had that forwarded to me I thought it was pretty scary.. And maybe it's not the flight number but it could be the baggage number or whatever there is a ton of numbers at the airport So i have no idea..... IF not then that sucks someone send that to me with knowing it was made up... Anyway.. THE POINT is that I like coming to my mailbox on days when i wanna escape from my daily activities, and see what people all over the word are thinking, facts, other non Tragic related stuff as well.. Believe me I am so upset about these tragedies BUT DONT YOU DARE tell me not to send e-mails and go do something, how do you know what i'm doing, and what i'm not, what about you... So, i will e-mail as I may, As also many other AP"s will do as long as we are putting NPR in the subject line.. IF YOU DONT LIKE IT GET THE DIGEST FORM OF THIS LIST..then you wont have any junk mail..... I'm not a mean person, and I have a big heart.. So, please stop being so petty.. I just want us all to get along on here..back to NPR we should be able to dicuss anything, as long as it's not racial thats just wrong (going back a few weeks that stuff really pissed me off) Take care Poe FANS. hugs, Anna ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:02:27 -0500 From: Jennifer Cook Subject: RE: NPR-check this out...HOAX Just to let you know... I have no problem with getting a ton of e-mails from the list. That's why I made sure to send a second e-mail stating that. Mine was just a rant about stupid forwards and hoaxes, and I'm sorry if that may have offended. I love getting my Poe-mail too, and if I see a subject that doesn't particularly interest me, I make good use of that "delete" key. - -----Original Message----- From: Finedragonfly7@aol.com [mailto:Finedragonfly7@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:00 PM To: rbbrantley@steelspaninc.com; angry-psychos@smoe.org; jayson_g69@hotmail.com Subject: Re: NPR-check this out...HOAX Hello to everyone.. And for those who are complaining that people are sending emails about Erie facts and so on..WHY dont u just press delete. I myself like hearing POE stuff, and I surely hear tons on NPR things, but there are stated as NPR so if you have a problem just delete takes 2 seconds.. Or get the digest for of this list... Also, I wasn't the one who created that word thing, I had that forwarded to me I thought it was pretty scary.. And maybe it's not the flight number but it could be the baggage number or whatever there is a ton of numbers at the airport So i have no idea..... IF not then that sucks someone send that to me with knowing it was made up... Anyway.. THE POINT is that I like coming to my mailbox on days when i wanna escape from my daily activities, and see what people all over the word are thinking, facts, other non Tragic related stuff as well.. Believe me I am so upset about these tragedies BUT DONT YOU DARE tell me not to send e-mails and go do something, how do you know what i'm doing, and what i'm not, what about you... So, i will e-mail as I may, As also many other AP"s will do as long as we are putting NPR in the subject line.. IF YOU DONT LIKE IT GET THE DIGEST FORM OF THIS LIST..then you wont have any junk mail..... I'm not a mean person, and I have a big heart.. So, please stop being so petty.. I just want us all to get along on here..back to NPR we should be able to dicuss anything, as long as it's not racial thats just wrong (going back a few weeks that stuff really pissed me off) Take care Poe FANS. hugs, Anna ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:32:18 -0500 From: "jayson g" Subject: NPR-check this out...HOAX No. No no. I'm not talking about what comes from the AP's. And, yeah, I know where the delete button is and it's in frequent use. What I was bitching about was what my OWN personal friends and co-workers send me. Just a rant that I was feeling on and wanted to share, nothing more. So please, F-dragon, post whatever you want! My Apologies, - -Jay. - -How could I have not expected someone to get offended and write a six paragraph response? >From: Finedragonfly7@aol.com >To: rbbrantley@steelspaninc.com, angry-psychos@smoe.org, >jayson_g69@hotmail.com >Subject: Re: NPR-check this out...HOAX >Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:00:07 EDT > > >Hello to everyone.. And for those who are complaining that people are >sending >emails about Erie facts and so on..(blah blah) _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:17:31 EDT From: Beener2100@aol.com Subject: Re: NPR: Finished HOL Yup.. It was excellent.. A whole month of my life was spent being engulfed in that book... then another two months was spent thinking anout it.. lol Alezka ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 18:32:35 EDT From: Spidersrcute2@aol.com Subject: NPR Air ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 18:34:32 -0400 From: "Sarah Lippert" Subject: Re: NPR-check this out... oh wow. this really did blow me away. just alittle scary, isn't it? ~SaraH "sometimes you have to go alittle crazy to stay sane" - - ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:52 PM Subject: NPR-check this out... > >This will blow you away. > > >A friend sent this to me check it out.. very freaky.. ~anna >******************************************************************* >go into MS word Type "Q33 NY" in capital letters (which is the flight >number >of one of the planes who crashed in to the WTC)... then apply "Bold" and > >font size 26 (or bigger)... >and change the font into "wingdings" (the first one)... >and look... you won't believe it! _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 18:37:19 EDT From: Spidersrcute2@aol.com Subject: NPR AIR Sorry about the last one, I seem to do that at least once every few weeks. The song by Air is Sexy Boy, not sexy body Megan. Sorry, I sound like Mega Bitch, but thank my mom for years of telling me it's "seen, not saw". Proper spelling proper english and you'd better make sure you got it right or she gave you that "mom" look. N e ways, I watched Virgin Suicides because my b-friend at the time kept playing the damn soundtrack for me over and over and I just had to see a movie that had this great music behind it. My fave song from them is Remember, but I also love Playground Love which is on the soundtrack. Their music is just too good to narrow it down to a couple of songs though, I love them all. And yes, I have been out of the loop for a bit, got a job and I'm actually working 40 hours a week now and don't have time to make love to the computer much anymore. Ah well, 'cest la vie!! Tracie ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:49:55 +0000 (GMT) From: Cyberfan Corporation Subject: I just called KZON Phoenix... They said that they are playing POE - WILD So that is cool... *************************************************** JK/// Jarrod Kniff President - Cyberfan Corporation jarrod@cyberfan.com *************************************************** "One important key to success is self-confidence. An important key to self-confidence is preparation." -- Arthur Ashe *************************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 18:55:31 -0500 From: "brendles" Subject: My experience with requesting "Wild" GRRRRRRRR.....after days of tormenting my favorite Edge decision-makers here in Dallas, I finally received the following dismal reply. PLEASE...everyone help me up the ante by bombarding them with requests! Program Director "Big Daddy Duane" duane@kdge.com "Naked Lunch" with Ayo ayo@kdge.com "The Adventure Club" with Josh josh@kdge.com Thanks to all who can find time to help :-) Bren > -----Original Message----- > From: Ayo [mailto:Ayo@KDGE.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:50 PM > To: 'Ball, Brenda' > Subject: RE: request! > > there were many many many that didnt make it that we want to play....that > was one, unfortunately. > we added Tenacious D, Lenny Kravitz, New Order, Sum 41, and Blink..... > A > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ball, Brenda [mailto:BBall@alliedmarketinggroup.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:24 PM > To: 'ayo@kdge.com' > Subject: request! > > Hi Ayo! > > It's me again. I heard you talking yesterday about your meeting with Duane and Josh to finally select some new music to be > added to the Edge playlist. Please, please, please...tell me one of the songs is Wild by Poe??? As I have told you before, I > keep hearing it on the Merge when I'm in my friend's car, and can't wait for the Edge to pick it up...it's a really > an excellent song. > > Please play it for me sometime soon!?! > > Thanks, > Brenda ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 20:02:30 EDT From: LiveThruThisVow@aol.com Subject: Re: NPR AIR Suicide Underground is my favorite. I used it for a storytelling piece. ~*~ Burning inside (i cross myself it doesn't help) because I'm not smart enough (digging into hot white) learning not to lie (we cross it out and stay away) another sonic life~ Sonic Youth ~*~ I can't get laid cuz everyone is dead~ Sonic Youth ------------------------------ End of angry-psychos-digest V6 #430 ***********************************