From: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org (angry-psychos-digest) To: angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Subject: angry-psychos-digest V5 #236 Reply-To: angry-psychos@smoe.org Sender: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk X-To-Unsubscribe: Send mail to "angry-psychos-digest-request@smoe.org" X-To-Unsubscribe: with "unsubscribe" as the body. angry-psychos-digest Tuesday, September 19 2000 Volume 05 : Number 236 Today's Subjects: ----------------- PR: still unsure about POE RELEASE DATE ["Da Poe Junkie" ] Re: POE Reviewed in Rolling Stone ["Red Halcyon" Subject: PR: still unsure about POE RELEASE DATE Hi... I'm visiting Klamath Falls, Oregon for the weekend A friend of mine here works at the Fred Meyers and their most updated release date says that the album will still be release on the 19th. I guess Tuesday will be the decider. ~jason _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 14:14:37 EDT From: KoriG@aol.com Subject: Re: PR: still unsure about POE RELEASE DATE Not to act like I'm trying to trump anyone, but all official words I get from Atlantic, (that is, DIRECT SPOKEN RESPONSES I ask of REAL PEOPLE who work at the company ... not past press releases, published dates, etc.,) tell me the pushback date is still Halloween. I'd love nothing more than Tuesday to come and SURPRISE! find the sucker out on the shelves all ready for the taking, but I just don't see it happening. KORi ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 22:33:01 EDT From: TimmysPrplMunky@aol.com Subject: Re: PR: still unsure about POE RELEASE DATE an add in rollingstone from wherehouse says its gunna be out the 31st. oh and there's also a review thing for the album in entertainment weekly. its cool it shows a pic and stuff. **jessica** ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 05:34:18 GMT From: "Da Poe Junkie" Subject: POE Reviewed in Rolling Stone The latest issue of Rolling Stone features a review of Poe's new album... and it doesn't look good. The reviewer was very skeptical about the album... quite a contrast from numerous other reveiws I've heard. They gave it 2 out of 5 stars. ~jason _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 23:04:01 PDT From: "Red Halcyon" Subject: Re: POE Reviewed in Rolling Stone Rollingstone can lick a llama's anus for all I care. I'm sure that you can dredge up some bad review of an album that went on to greatness; hell, no reviewer is immune to that. The only review, however, that counts is mine, AFAI'm concerned. And Haunted is good enough for me to be literature. Lee "Do your dreams come true?" "I haven't had a nice dream for years." - -Trois Couleurs: Rouge >The latest issue of Rolling Stone features a review of Poe's new album... >and it doesn't look good. The reviewer was very skeptical about the >album... quite a contrast from numerous other reveiws I've heard. > >They gave it 2 out of 5 stars. > >~jason _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 06:11:46 EDT From: KrodKnid@aol.com Subject: Re: POE Reviewed in Rolling Stone In a message dated 9/18/2000 1:49:29 AM Eastern Daylight Time, psychohero@hotmail.com writes: << The latest issue of Rolling Stone features a review of Poe's new album... and it doesn't look good. The reviewer was very skeptical about the album... quite a contrast from numerous other reveiws I've heard. They gave it 2 out of 5 stars. ~jason __________________________________________________________________ >> Probably just politics and business. Rolling Stone is lamer than Reader's Digest anymore. Poe's "people", to use Hollywoodese, probably didn't grease the right weasels in the hierarchy of power ------------------------------ End of angry-psychos-digest V5 #236 ***********************************