From: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org (angry-psychos-digest) To: angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Subject: angry-psychos-digest V3 #42 Reply-To: angry-psychos@smoe.org Sender: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk X-To-Unsubscribe: Send mail to "angry-psychos-digest-request@smoe.org" X-To-Unsubscribe: with "unsubscribe" as the body. angry-psychos-digest Wednesday, February 11 1998 Volume 03 : Number 042 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: NPR: That cute letter..... [Smurfolina@aol.com] Re: Psycho Ward (scanners) + That Chain Letter + me [Heart-Song ] Re: A different perspective [Nihasa9@aol.com] Re: APR: The Psycho Ward (Scanners) [Jarrod ] Newbie [MDamon21@aol.com] Re: A different perspective [IEd33I@aol.com] Re: Psycho Ward (scanners) + That Chain Letter + me [GaulAiel@aol.com] Re: Psycho Ward (scanners) + That Chain Letter + me [Flickergrl@aol.com] Re: Psycho Ward (scanners) + That Chain Letter + me [Heart-Song ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 01:33:56 EST From: Smurfolina@aol.com Subject: Re: NPR: That cute letter..... In a message dated 98-02-10 01:33:02 EST, pshairyn@hotmail.com writes: > IT'S A CHAIN LETTER!!!! It's not > supposed to be analyzed and disected... it's also not supposed to be sent to the list.... ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 01:57:29 -1000 From: Heart-Song Subject: Re: Psycho Ward (scanners) + That Chain Letter + me Woohoo...first post to the list. I've been on the list but inactive for ages now (over a year?). I just haven't had the time to deal with all my mailing lists. Especially since it's been so long since I've heard any new Poe music... But, thanks to those who set up and contributed to the ftp site, I'm re-hooked. :) (well, Poe never lost me...but the list did. ;) Anyways... Regarding the call for scanners, I'm certainly willing to lend a hand with this. I'll email with my information. i've sat back long enough...I like this idea, and I'd love to help. Regarding the chain letter... somebody mentioned looking at it in other ways...while I don't agree with the way that person tried to describe what was happening (IMO it was just a publicity stunt...which I'm seeing alot of on this list lately), I DO agree that everything in life should always be looked at from different angles. Especially if one particular angle is fed to you. *gech* There I go cerebralizing everything again. :) Ok...the rest of this letter is about me...if you don't have time to read it, or if you get bored with bios...feel free to skip it. :) WELL...I guess it's time to intro myself. My name is Frank Fletcher. My alter egos are Ailima Karuna Garachta Heart-Song (seperate entities, same soul). No...they can't clinically show that I have split-personalities. ;) Born in the Philippines, raised in Hong Kong, went to a German school for 11 years, boarding school in AZ, college in WI, been in Hawaii for the last 3 and a half years. Music? Well...Poe. I guess that's the most important part. :) Funnily enough, I enjoy mostly music written/performed by female artists. Maybe I'm biased. :) Tori, Portishead, Sneaker-Pimps, Melissa Ferrick, Sarah McLachlan, Melissa Etheridge. Lyrically, my favourite artist is probably M.E. Her lyrics are pure poetry to me. Don't ask me to choose a favourite musician, I love them all. :) Other media entertainment? Mostly I read and watch movies that I can either learn from or to get away from my own reality. I really enjoy some sci-fi and fantasy. My current favourite author is most probably Mercedes Lackey. Sports? I love everything. From Aikido to Kendo, from Sailing to Tennis, from Squash to Gymnastics. I was ranked in Hong Kong in both Squash and Tennis, but I've long since given up on either career. :) One caveat regarding my sports...I enjoy playing them, not watching them. Art? Well, I used to oil paint, write poetry, dabble in computer graphics, photography, violin, guitar, choir (before my voice broke ;). I still occasionally play at all of them, but haven't had the time or inclination until very recently again. (mostly poetry and photography) What do I do? I'm a computer consultant...but I'm moving to San Fransisco in about 2 months. (So Bay Area Psychos...WATCH OUT! :) There I'll hopefully go back to school to study AI and Art, I may eventually give modelling a go. I'm looking for jobs in the computer gaming or graphic design industry. As you can see...lots on my plate. :) Boring? I know...but you didn't have to read it. ;) Thank you, everybody that contributes to this list, to the ftp site, and to all the wonderful web sites. :) Be Well, Frank. - ------- ------------- -------- Frank Fletcher | Ailima@RydWorld | RDS | Efica | TMI-2 | IE | LB ffletche@hawaii.edu | Stryder -- undernet#coders | undernet#linux ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 07:34:21 EST From: ChixRock1@aol.com Subject: NPR: Introduction Hi my name is Katrina Bowman, i'm a 14 year old female from Niagara Falls NY. I first heard about POE from my friend, and went right out and bought it!!! It's been my favorite CD ever since.Some of my other favs are Sarah McLachlan, Jewel, Fiona Apple, Holly McNarland, Dar Williams, Paula Cole, Shawn Colvin ect..... Well that's about it!!! ~Katrina ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 07:37:44 EST From: GaulAiel@aol.com Subject: Re: Psycho Ward (scanners) + That Chain Letter + me In a message dated 98-02-10 07:15:52 EST, ffletche@hawaii.edu writes: << Music? Well...Poe. I guess that's the most important part. :) Funnily enough, I enjoy mostly music written/performed by female artists. Maybe I'm biased. :) Tori, Portishead, Sneaker-Pimps, Melissa Ferrick, Sarah McLachlan, Melissa Etheridge. Lyrically, my favourite artist is probably M.E. Her lyrics are pure poetry to me. Don't ask me to choose a favourite musician, I love them all. :) >> Or maybe we're all just victims of the force-feeding the record companies are doing to us. Typical of them to latch onto a trend and run it to death. Don't get me wrong, I in no way disparage these women's/groups talents, but I do find it interesting how the music industry works. My question is, when this trend dies down, are they going to ignore women again like they've done for the most part over the years? That would be the real shame. Doug ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 03:15:52 -1000 From: Heart-Song Subject: Re: Psycho Ward (scanners) + That Chain Letter + me > In a message dated 98-02-10 07:15:52 EST, ffletche@hawaii.edu writes: > > < female...>> > > > Or maybe we're all just victims of the force-feeding the record companies are > doing to us. Typical of them to latch onto a trend and run it to death. Don't > get me wrong, I in no way disparage these women's/groups talents, but I do > find it interesting how the music industry works. My question is, when this > trend dies down, are they going to ignore women again like they've done for > the most part over the years? That would be the real shame. I hate to disagree on this matter. I think it is my bias ;) and not any fault of the industry's. I've always been fond of female vocalists, and I find that 90% of the time, female lyrics just mean a heck of alot more to me than male lyrics. I enjoy the emotional content in female lyrics and vocals. Few male artists that I've heard can emulate that (except in Country Music, which I can only stand when they sing in key, and sans insipid lyrics). One exception that I heard today was Live and the Thunder song. I've always enjoyed that song. A song about birth, life and death. Most music that I indulge myself with, I do so for either a particular mood or groove (in which case, it's definitely my bias at work), or because of the lyrical content (in which case, it's my view that the females I listen to just have something that most males artists lack, and probably don't even look for...of course, it could still be my bias. ;) Whether the industry capitalizes on the rising prominence of female artists is not really important. At the end of it, we get to choose what we eat. If the masses enjoy what they listen to, who cares? Regarding whether said female artists remain popular after theDH`ndustry focus veers from their direction... Who knows? But I can tell you this...it's the people, and not the industry that control this. (by definition of "popular" even). The industry can guide the people, absolutely...but it's not always that case. For instance, the industry was actually slow to accept these female artists...but when Lillith Fair was put on, it was the people that slapped the industry in the face, and said, "THIS is what we want to listen to now." The industry soon got the idea. (at least this is my feel from it all) The current focus on female musical artists is not a bad thing, wether industry driven or not. It has helped to change alot of gender biases. When the focus fades...female artists will most likely have a better position than they would have, had these past few years not happened. On another note, alot of people on here lately have been expressing highly antagonistic viewpoints. This is fine...your first amendment rights at work. However, it gets tiring sometimes (MY first amendment rights at work ;)...especially if it is the same people (over and over again) expressing different antagonistic viewpoints. After a while, this seems more like a plee for attention rather than the expression of true opinions. Of course, once this has started, people probably truly assume those opinions...but that's another point entirely. :) BTW...these are all my personal opinions, and no, I'm not pointing any fingers...just a general feeling I'm getting from certain people on this list. Overall, I love the list, I love the information it provides, I love the hQ `J<),-ZTake Care, >%k Frank. - ------- ------------- -------- Frank Fletcher | Ailima@RydWorld | RDS | Efica | TMI-2 | IE | LB ffletche@hawaii.edu | Stryder -- undernet#coders | undernet#linux ------------------------------ Date: 10 Feb 1998 09:14:20 -0700 From: "PadmaT" Subject: A different perspective It's funny, but I listened to a female vocalists almost exclusively when I was a single male (must've needed that "female energy"). Now that I'm "involved" I listen to both men and women about equally. I can't talk about "trends" in depth, or record companies force-feeding anyone, because my favorite vocalist has always been (and remains) Grace Slick of the Jefferson Airplane, but I doubt that it's so much "force feeding" as it is women coming into their own artistically. Madonna and The Spice Girls aside, it seems to me that more and more women are writing intelligent lyrics and are no longer content to rely solely upon sex appeal...that the "trend" has to do with substance and content, and with an audience finally impatient with drivel. With vocalists/songwriters like Bjork, Poe, Jewel, et al, women are enjoying a well-deserved attention, which they have EARNED, and which is long overdue. IMHO. Padma _______________________________________________________________________________ From: Heart-Song on Tue, Feb 10, 1998 9:00 AM Subject: Re: Psycho Ward (scanners) + That Chain Letter + me To: GaulAiel@aol.com Cc: angry-psychos@smoe.org > In a message dated 98-02-10 07:15:52 EST, ffletche@hawaii.edu writes: > > < female...>> > > > Or maybe we're all just victims of the force-feeding the record companies are > doing to us. Typical of them to latch onto a trend and run it to death. Don't > get me wrong, I in no way disparage these women's/groups talents, but I do > find it interesting how the music industry works. My question is, when this > trend dies down, are they going to ignore women again like they've done for > the most part over the years? That would be the real shame. I hate to disagree on this matter. I think it is my bias ;) and not any fault of the industry's. I've always been fond of female vocalists, and I find that 90% of the time, female lyrics just mean a heck of alot more to me than male lyrics. I enjoy the emotional content in female lyrics and vocals. Few male artists that I've heard can emulate that (except in Country Music, which I can only stand when they sing in key, and sans insipid lyrics). One exception that I heard today was Live and the Thunder song. I've always enjoyed that song. A song about birth, life and death. Most music that I indulge myself with, I do so for either a particular mood or groove (in which case, it's definitely my bias at work), or because of the lyrical content (in which case, it's my view that the females I listen to just have something that most males artists lack, and probably don't even look for...of course, it could still be my bias. ;) Whether the industry capitalizes on the rising prominence of female artists is not really important. At the end of it, we get to choose what we eat. If the masses enjoy what they listen to, who cares? Regarding whether said female artists remain popular after theDH`ndustry focus veers from their direction... Who knows? But I can tell you this...it's the people, and not the industry that control this. (by definition of "popular" even). The industry can guide the people, absolutely...but it's not always that case. For instance, the industry was actually slow to accept these female artists...but when Lillith Fair was put on, it was the people that slapped the industry in the face, and said, "THIS is what we want to listen to now." The industry soon got the idea. (at least this is my feel from it all) The current focus on female musical artists is not a bad thing, wether industry driven or not. It has helped to change alot of gender biases. When the focus fades...female artists will most likely have a better position than they would have, had these past few years not happened. On another note, alot of people on here lately have been expressing highly antagonistic viewpoints. This is fine...your first amendment rights at work. However, it gets tiring sometimes (MY first amendment rights at work ;)...especially if it is the same people (over and over again) expressing different antagonistic viewpoints. After a while, this seems more like a plee for attention rather than the expression of true opinions. Of course, once this has started, people probably truly assume those opinions...but that's another point entirely. :) BTW...these are all my personal opinions, and no, I'm not pointing any fingers...just a general feeling I'm getting from certain people on this list. Overall, I love the list, I love the information it provides, I love the hQ `J<),-ZTake Care, >%k Frank. - ------- ------------- -------- Frank Fletcher | Ailima@RydWorld | RDS | Efica | TMI-2 | IE | LB ffletche@hawaii.edu | Stryder -- undernet#coders | undernet#linux - ------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------ Received: by mail.rmc.org with ADMIN;10 Feb 1998 09:00:32 -0700 Received: from smoe.org (jane.smoe.org) [204.167.97.154] (majordom) by mermaid.shore.net with smtp (Exim) id 0y2I0t-0001u9-00; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 10:54:23 -0500 Received: from localhost by jane.smoe.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4-listq-jane) id KAA07729; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 10:54:54 -0500 Received: by jane.smoe.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Tue, 10 Feb 1998 10:54:53 -0500 Received: by jane.smoe.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4-listq-jane) id KAA07641; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 10:42:23 -0500 Received: from relay1.Hawaii.Edu (relay1.Hawaii.Edu [128.171.3.53]) by jane.smoe.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4-daemon-mode-relay2) with SMTP id KAA07636 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 10:42:12 -0500 Received: from uhunix2.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.7]) by relay1.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <171135(4)>; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 05:39:53 -1000 Received: from localhost by uhunix2.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <148567(7)>; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 03:15:57 -1000 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 03:15:52 -1000 From: Heart-Song X-Sender: ffletche@uhunix2 Reply-To: Heart-Song To: GaulAiel@aol.com cc: angry-psychos@smoe.org Subject: Re: Psycho Ward (scanners) + That Chain Letter + me In-Reply-To: <9c585c77.34e04a1a@aol.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-angry-psychos@smoe.org X-To-Unsubscribe: Send mail to "angry-psychos-request@smoe.org" X-To-Unsubscribe: with "unsubscribe" as the body. Precedence: bulk ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 13:06:42 EST From: Nihasa9@aol.com Subject: Re: A different perspective In a message dated 98-02-10 11:40:40 EST, padmat@mail.rmc.org writes: << It's funny, but I listened to a female vocalists almost exclusively when I was a single male (must've needed that "female energy"). >> Naw..you just wanted to pick up the chics. =P hehe. j/k ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 11:43:42 -0700 (MST) From: Jarrod Subject: Re: APR: The Psycho Ward (Scanners) I only add an issue of picture size.... If you are working on your picture to add to The psycho Ward, SIZE REQUIREMENTS... width : 145 pixels height: 180 pixels Thanks Everybody... Things are really shaping up and llok for The Psycho Ward to be open in one week... Jarrod Angry Psycho in The Ward On Mon, 9 Feb 1998 IEd33I@aol.com wrote: > Alright.. The Psycho Ward is getting closer and closer to being up and > going... what we need is for people who are willing to scan photos for people > to stand up and be counted.. :) if you are willing to scan pictures in for > people... let us know...send an email to 'appics@aol.com' with the following > info... > > Full Name: > Email address: > Mailing address: > > Whether you have a color scanner or black and white: > Umm and anythign else we might need to know.... > > Send this to 'appics@aol.com' NOT to the list.. we will post a name of > scanners to the list when it is organized... umm.. lessee.. anything else to > add Jarrod or Kitana?? > > Ed > ed@poe.org > ied33i@aol.com > Jarrod * The proud succeed. The weak complain. * ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 16:10:53 EST From: MDamon21@aol.com Subject: Newbie Hey there! `````Im Sebastien Ross, originally from Switzerland, but lived in New York, and Georgia, and Now South Florida. My english is not soo perfect :). I am a 17 year old male. I first heard Poe ona compilation CD (forget the name) in about late 95, early 96. I listen to Jewel, Lisa Loeb, STP, Sublime, Sarah McLachlan, Joan Osborne, Tori Amos, EdwinMcCain, Paula Cole, The CardigansEleanor McEvoy, Chantal Kreviazuk, Tara McLean, and All the rest :). Finally, I can speak abou;11 or 13 languages, and I can yodel :) Thanks for listening ") ~~~~~~~~~ If ya'll wanna trade some tapes, email me =) See ya =) Seb {\o/} /_\ Tape List: http://members.aol.com/JewelEDA21/tapes.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 17:44:03 EST From: IEd33I@aol.com Subject: Re: A different perspective In a message dated 98-02-10 13:43:38 EST, you write: << Naw..you just wanted to pick up the chics. =P hehe. j/k >> yeah that's why I do it.. :) guys that listen to female artists are kinda rare, and the chicks dig us... :) (don't hit me Ashley.. ;) Ed ed@poe.org ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 17:40:33 EST From: GaulAiel@aol.com Subject: Re: Psycho Ward (scanners) + That Chain Letter + me In a message dated 98-02-10 10:40:01 EST, ffletche@hawaii.edu writes: << I hate to disagree on this matter. I think it is my bias ;) and not any fault of the industry's. I've always been fond of female vocalists, and I find that 90% of the time, female lyrics just mean a heck of alot more to me than male lyrics. I enjoy the emotional content in female lyrics and vocals. >> While I, too enjoy the music of some of the female artists out there today, I would not say that female lyrics mean any more than male lyrics do. While that might be the politically correct thing to say, i just don't see that. I don't look at male/female artists any differently. They can both be equally good/bad lyrically or musically. <> Actually, I don't think Lilith surprised them at all, considering they've been in full swing all along, with every label signing their token female act over the past couple of years. They had all jumped aboard on the trend already. The success of Lilith was almost a sure thing, with the radio airplay women's music has gotten the last few years. There's definitely an agenda on the part of the music industry, as there always has been. It just takes different forms from year to year. Nothing personal... these are just my opinions... they could be wrong :) Gaul Aiel ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 18:31:53 EST From: Flickergrl@aol.com Subject: Re: Psycho Ward (scanners) + That Chain Letter + me In a message dated 98-02-10 18:25:09 EST, you write: > While I, too enjoy the music of some of the female artists out there today, I > would not say that female lyrics mean any more than male lyrics do. While > that > might be the politically correct thing to say, i just don't see that. I don' > t > look at male/female artists any differently. They can both be equally good/ > bad > lyrically or musically. no lyrics mean more than any other lyrics really. i guess what attaches me most to a song/artist is if i can relate to what they have to sing about... some people relate better to what girl artists have to say, and some people relate to lyrics from a guy's point of view... ya know? > Nothing personal... these are just my opinions... they could be wrong :) no one's opinions can be WRONG... it's just their opinion.. whatever they choose to think. :) on another note, pleeease look at my kacy crowley webpage and sign the guestbook because it would make me happy :P ~*anchorless*~ - my kacy crowley webpage: http://members.aol.com/flickergrl/kacyindex.html kacy is a great awesome singer, and she's on a little tour now, so check to see if she's coming to your city!! :) byebye ~*brette ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 13:46:36 -1000 From: Heart-Song Subject: Re: Psycho Ward (scanners) + That Chain Letter + me Warning...This post is in regards to Female Arists and how the industry deals with them...which really only vaguely Poe Related... Interestingly enough, I didn't think that letter was sent out. As you can see, there was some major line noise...and I got disconnected and I thought that the letter was lost. (was VERY frusterated at 3am last night when that happened) I know the letter wasn't quite finished...but I think the main gist of it went across. :) On Tue, 10 Feb 1998 GaulAiel@AOL.COM wrote: > While I, too enjoy the music of some of the female artists out there today, I > would not say that female lyrics mean any more than male lyrics do. While that > might be the politically correct thing to say, i just don't see that. I don't > look at male/female artists any differently. They can both be equally good/bad > lyrically or musically. Hrmm...my apologies for any implication that you see one as "better" than the other. In fact, I completely agree with you re "that one genders lyrics don't mean more than the other." I should have said that "generally, in my opinion, the trend seems to be, and for my tastes..." No that is in no way sarcasm, even though I can be very good at that too. :) The phrase I mentioned above, still stands, though. It's just how I feel about what I see. Perhaps it really is my bias. :) > Actually, I don't think Lilith surprised them at all, considering they've > been in full swing all along, with every label signing their token female act > over the past couple of years. They had all jumped aboard on the trend > already. The success of Lilith was almost a sure thing, with the radio airplay > women's music has gotten the last few years. There's definitely an agenda on > the part of the music industry, as there always has been. It just takes > different forms from year to year. Hrmm...I can accept this. It may just be the PR campaign (by the industry ;) that I was buying in to. I had remembered a few shows and interviews that explained how certain key people would not back Lillith Fair and tried to discourage them, saying it would never work. Then, there were the nicknames for the tour that went around, "Lesbo Fair", "Dykes 'R Us", etc. These names went around (supposedly) in the industry itself. The fact that certain key entities would turn down Lillith in favour of some of the more traditional male bands... seemed to say something. This all may or may not be true...although I did see interviews with certain critics who publically ate their words and admitted they were wrong. :) Still...sometimes it gets so that you can't tell truth from exaggeration from down right lies. > Nothing personal... these are just my opinions... they could be wrong :) Good opinions, well expressed, well met. :) Oh...and ditto for me regarding personal opinion. :) Blessed Be, Frank. - ------- ------------- -------- Frank Fletcher | Ailima@RydWorld | RDS | Efica | TMI-2 | IE | LB ffletche@hawaii.edu | Stryder -- undernet#coders | undernet#linux ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 18:46:42 -0500 (EST) From: HappyFantom Subject: Re: Psycho Ward (scanners) + That Chain Letter + me Um, I would just like to say that i have been listening to sarah mclachlan since 1989 and tori amos since 1991, far before the so-called "trends" you talk about ever started. SOme of us, believe it or not, just like to here decent and original music. I don't know why that should surprise you. steve ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 20:59:32 EST From: Oblivius1@aol.com Subject: NPR:opinions and kacy crowley Brette AKA Flickergrl@aol.com wrote so savvily: << no one's opinions can be WRONG... it's just their opinion.. whatever they choose to think. :) >> exactly....opinions are just what they are....opinions...therefore none can be incorrect....unfortunately what we call fact these days is basically opinion...laws and such.....whether they be scientific laws or somesuch...in any case...its a shame... <> two thumbs up for making Brettalicious happy.........and supporting Kacy Crowley....i'm being driven into town for the Austin show which would be this friday 10-13.....if anyone's in the area and wants to check out new music..it will be at the local borders bookstore...... anyway...enough plugs and such.. will someone please tell me why it is that we look at people by how much pigment happened to be developed/inherited within their skin..of all the petty f-ing things!!...and then there's always other issues... Pissed off at the human race, as always, disillusioned@poe.org ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 21:44:49 EST From: Flickergrl@aol.com Subject: actual poe news hey hey hey so i was flipping through a magazinethingie that i found behind the counter at blockbuster music (where i work) and lo and behold.... there's POE's name in bold.. seems that she might be on some soundtrack for a movie called "Welcome to the Woop Woop" (I swear i'm not making this up!!!) and it seems a bunch of artists are singing covers of rogers and hammerstein songs. anyone know anything about this???????????? (jarrod?) oh. does anyone watch Dawson's Creek? this show is soooo hilarious. "i'm the best sex you've never had..." - pacy. LOL that just made me die laughing. ~*brette ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 22:37:42 EST From: MDamon21@aol.com Subject: Uh-OH read, plz Hey there- I have to vchange names, and my new screenname is: ANGPSYCPOE@aol.com THanks, sorry its irrelevant! luv, Seb ") ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 22:05:43 -0600 (CST) From: "Lawrence J. Kim" Subject: Welcome to Woop-Woop Below is what I got from http://us.imdb.com ... Lawrence - who thinks "L.A. Confidential" shoulda gotta a lot more nominations than "Titanic" - --------------- Welcome to Woop-Woop Australia / UK 1997 Color Produced by: Scala Productions Certification: USA:R Language: English Genre/keyword: Comedy Runtime: 103 Sound Mix: DTS Also Known As: Big Red, The (1997) (working title) Directed by: Stephan Elliott Cast (in alphabetical order): Alan Finney Rachel Griffiths (I) .... Sylvia Barry Humphries .... Wally Richard Moir .... Reggie Susie Porter .... Angie Johnathon Schaech ....Teddy Dee Smart .... Krystal Rod Taylor .... Daddy O Written by: Michael Thomas (III) Cinematography by: Mike Molloy Music by: Stewart Copeland Film Editing by: Martin Walsh Other crew: Michael Corden .... first assistant editor Polly Duval .... producers' assistant assisant to producer Stephen Law (I) .... post-production consultant ------------------------------ End of angry-psychos-digest V3 #42 **********************************