From: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org (angry-psychos-digest) To: angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Subject: angry-psychos-digest V2 #400 Reply-To: angry-psychos@smoe.org Sender: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk X-To-Unsubscribe: Send mail to "angry-psychos-digest-request@smoe.org" X-To-Unsubscribe: with "unsubscribe" as the body. angry-psychos-digest Tuesday, December 16 1997 Volume 02 : Number 400 Today's Subjects: ----------------- NPR: Re: A message [John deBoer ] Learn to Read, Dan! ["PadmaT" ] [none] ["Victoria Barth" ] LALALa ["Victoria Barth" ] NPR: Re: A message [YEEL96E@prodigy.com (OO LALA)] Re: A message ["Bill Holz" ] (Fwd) Re: another Christmas song spoof ["Michele Santiago" ] Newbie.... ["me (mark)" ] Re: cottin pickin hands [Dink6 ] Newbie.... [YEEL96E@prodigy.com (OO LALA)] Re: NPR: cottin pickin hands [YEEL96E@prodigy.com (OO LALA)] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 01:30:49 -0500 (EST) From: John deBoer Subject: NPR: Re: A message On Sun, 14 Dec 1997, Dink6 wrote: > In a message dated 97-12-13 15:44:47 EST, you write: > > << angry-psychos@smoe.org >> > > > to because i guess i realized that it was pretty dumb, but if i am saying > something is gay i mean it sux, not 'gawd that is SO homosexual!' it really Ah, but that's what I mean. Gay shouldn't be a synonym for sucky. I'm not attacking you or anything. But why don't you say, "That's so maleficent!" or something instead? Twalen Fleety MonkeyMan "Knitting is like the ultimate form of procrastination"--Sara Vaughn ------------------------------ Date: 15 Dec 1997 06:56:39 -0700 From: "PadmaT" Subject: Learn to Read, Dan! Man, you gotta read a little more closely. My only point was that the drive for sexual union is the same as the drive for religious experience--that being, ecstasy. Whether or not people have sex in heaven is anyone's guess, and it certainly is not what I wrote. Get a life, and please--learn to read! _______________________________________________________________________________ From: danradloff on Thu, Dec 11, 1997 9:05 PM Subject: Re: Sex merely a chemical impulse? To: PadmaT Cc: poe you have got to be shittin' me. This is the biggest bunch of BS i have heard in a long time. Do you think that dead people care about sex. No. Do you think they have sex in heaven. (at least more than just missionary). I doubt they have whips and chains and stuff in heaven. Besides, i'm not a religious person so i don't care about the corrolation of sex and church (it would make me show up at church more though). Just how do souls and bodiless spirits have sex anyway. - -----Original Message----- From: PadmaT To: Angry Psychos Date: Thursday, December 11, 1997 1:35 PM Subject: Sex merely a chemical impulse? >Why make such an unnatural separation? Sex--and the drive toward >ecstasy--unites humanity with nearly all other living things. Even the drive >toward religious experience is grounded in the need for ecstasy, so much so >that many religions are threatened by the ability of sexuality to make the >ecstatic experience available to all people, not only "members of the church". >The fruit of sexuality (new life) connects us not only to our ancestors but >all the way back to the big f**king bang, and into the future through our >progeny. Mere chemical impulses...I don't think so! > >My two bits. > >Padma > >___________________________________________________________________________ ____ >From: danradloff on Thu, Dec 11, 1997 12:41 PM > >"Sex is just something that a bunch of chemical impulses in my brain >desires. Sex is only for the body. Love is for the soul." > - ------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------ Received: by mail.rmc.org with ADMIN;11 Dec 1997 21:00:41 -0700 Received: from jane.smoe.org (majordom@smoe.org [204.167.97.154]) by relay1.shore.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id VAA04982; Thu, 11 Dec 1997 21:28:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost by jane.smoe.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4-listq-jane) id VAA02612; Thu, 11 Dec 1997 21:29:13 -0500 Received: by jane.smoe.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Thu, 11 Dec 1997 21:29:11 -0500 Received: by jane.smoe.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4-listq-jane) id VAA02531; Thu, 11 Dec 1997 21:18:15 -0500 Received: from kramer.pcisys.net (kramer.pcisys.net [207.76.102.252]) by jane.smoe.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4-daemon-mode-relay2) with ESMTP id VAA02527 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 1997 21:18:07 -0500 Received: from danradloff (peter49.pcisys.net [208.198.212.49]) by kramer.pcisys.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) via SMTP id TAA20150; Thu, 11 Dec 1997 19:16:01 -0700 (MST) env-from (danradloff@pcisys.net) From: "danradloff" To: "PadmaT" Cc: "poe" Subject: Re: Sex merely a chemical impulse? Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 19:15:13 -0700 Message-ID: <01bd06a3$c7f68620$31d4c6d0@danradloff> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 Sender: owner-angry-psychos@smoe.org X-To-Unsubscribe: Send mail to "angry-psychos-request@smoe.org" X-To-Unsubscribe: with "unsubscribe" as the body. Precedence: bulk ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 09:42:38 PST From: "Victoria Barth" Subject: [none] HI My name is Victoria And I'm from Eagle River, Alaska. (brrrr) I'm 14 years old. I first heard of POE when i won her cd as a door prize. At first i didn't care much for it. But i after i realy started listening to it i really got into it. I also listen to Tracy Bonham, the spice girls and any celtic music. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 09:42:56 PST From: "Victoria Barth" Subject: LALALa HI My name is Victoria And I'm from Eagle River, Alaska. (brrrr) I'm 14 years old. I first heard of POE when i won her cd as a door prize. At first i didn't care much for it. But i after i realy started listening to it i really got into it. I also listen to Tracy Bonham, the spice girls and any celtic music. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 13:10:30, -0500 From: YEEL96E@prodigy.com (OO LALA) Subject: NPR: Re: A message >Ah, but that's what I mean. Gay shouldn't be a synonym for sucky. I'm >not attacking you or anything. But why don't you say, "That's so >maleficent!" or something instead? so tell me, you guys - why is it alright to use "gay" as a synonym for "homosexual (for all you pathetically politically correct people out there, "same gender oriented")?" gay traditionally means happy and joyful, but was adapted for its current use. hey, i figure what's good for the goose is good for the gander. ____ - ------------------------------------ oolala@aros.net ICQ #4740929 http://www.arosnet.com/~oolala ------------------------------------- visit The Kobran Imperium BBS 1.801.265.1299 ------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 14:29:09 -0600 From: "Bill Holz" Subject: Re: A message >>Ah, but that's what I mean. Gay shouldn't be a synonym for sucky. >>I'm not attacking you or anything. But why don't you say, "That's so >>maleficent!" or something instead? >so tell me, you guys - why is it alright to use "gay" as a synonym for >"homosexual (for all you pathetically politically correct people out there, >"same gender oriented")?" gay traditionally means happy and joyful, but >was adapted for its current use. > >hey, i figure what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Oooh! Two points for the Oo-lala lady! Personally I'm against all forms of discrimination, and of course this includes reverse descrimination and 'termology' (such as the example here). A person's a person. .and a word is a word. . what should be important is the heart and soul of the person and the intent behind the word, not how said person and word can be radically interpreted! Just my 2cents - -Me ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 15:42:30 -0500 From: "Michele Santiago" Subject: (Fwd) Re: another Christmas song spoof - ------- Forwarded Message Follows ------- From: "Jeff Adams" To: shell@poe.org Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 12:23:45 PST Hey that little song was pretty happy, And happy is a rare thing in any music, (even christmas.) :) Oh yea HEY EVERYONE I FOUND THAT DAMN MAXI SINGLE finnaly... that damn maxi single.. hee hee hee.. I guess only Jarrod and I could apriciate the humor in the fact that that statment wasn't planned... Oh yea, I've been outta the "Angry Psychoes." little happy mailing list for a while, my computer had a bad day.. But I am back my fellow psychoes.. Oh yea today is my birthday.. So everyone cheer... (And If I accidently sent this message to just one person please forward to the mailing list.. thnx...) Well I have babled enough laters people - -Jeff ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 16:14:12 -0400 From: jthompson@lib.schoolofvisualarts.edu (J Thompson) Subject: cottin pickin hands Responding to the message of Sun, 14 Dec 1997 12:21:28 EST from Dink6 : > > In a message dated 97-12-13 15:44:47 EST, you write: > > << angry-psychos@smoe.org >> yeah, i kinda agree with what you got to say there. i mean its kinda like saying "get your cotton picking hands offa me"----think about it-----jesse > > okay i guess i can sorta agree with you on that one, but i happen to be a > girl > that likes girls and i say 'thats so gay' all the time. not as much as i > used > to because i guess i realized that it was pretty dumb, but if i am saying > something is gay i mean it sux, not 'gawd that is SO homosexual!' it > really > depends on the connotation and the force and intent of the word (if that > made > any sense whatsoever) in the way it is said. anyway, that is just my > thought...buh bye > > > ~dinkie ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 16:25:35 -0400 From: jthompson@lib.schoolofvisualarts.edu (J Thompson) Subject: everyone hey, i was just curious how many of you live in either ny or nj? i go to school in nyc and live in nj. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 16:56:00 -0500 From: "COBB,KYLE" Subject: NPR RE: Re: A message Not to get involved in a semantic discussion, but referring to something "as gay" in a negative context is the actual origin of the homosexual term. Similar to the use of the negative term "bad" to describe something "good" in the modern context. The term "gay" was applied to homosexuals as a negative based on effeminate qualities found in stereotypes. Though my opinion is of little consequence, its not the words you use, it's how you use them... Pax, KyL Kyl Cobb kcobb@lawco.com (kyl_the_paladin@hotmail.com) Visit my personal Web site at www.geocities.com/athens/delphi/8442/index.html -----Original Message----- From: OO LALA Sent: Monday, December 15, 1997 1:10 PM To: KCOBB; 'ANGRY-PS@SMTP' Subject: NPR: Re: A message >Ah, but that's what I mean. Gay shouldn't be a synonym for sucky. I'm >not attacking you or anything. But why don't you say, "That's so >maleficent!" or something instead? so tell me, you guys - why is it alright to use "gay" as a synonym for "homosexual (for all you pathetically politically correct people out there, "same gender oriented")?" gay traditionally means happy and joyful, but was adapted for its current use. hey, i figure what's good for the goose is good for the gander. ____ ------------------------------------ oolala@aros.net ICQ #4740929 http://www.arosnet.com/~oolala ------------------------------------- visit The Kobran Imperium BBS 1.801.265.1299 ------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 17:56:52 -0500 (EST) From: "me (mark)" Subject: Newbie.... Dear all, As of Friday, I joined the poe mailing list, and since then my inbox has been flooded with much more garbage then I ever expected, though none of it relates to Poe. I don't like to be the one that complains all the time, in fact, most people won't even read to this part. But is it really necessary for us to continue to argue about stupid points like whether the term "gay" should refer strictly to homosexuals or not (in no way was that statement meant to offend anyone, my opinion is that by arguing on this list-serv, there is not going to be any change in the capacity of the use of the term "gay" to mean something other than the original homosexual content). I read somwhere that there is supposed to be a new Poe album in February or March. If anyone has information on this, it would be appriciated, much more than any petty arguements at least. Sincerely, Mark ______________________________________________________________________________ ...but the food, it doesn't taste so good since being bombed. ______________________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 21:21:20 EST From: Dink6 Subject: Re: cottin pickin hands okay well as to the whole thing about gay tradishonally being used as a word for joyous and happy, the word 'fuck' origonally had something to do with the pilgrims. not sex, and certainly not in the conotation of 'fucking prick bastard..asshole....etc.' our society has completly corrupted our language, which wasnt even ours to destroy!! kinda selfish when you think about it but oh well. newayz i'll go =) bye all! eternally, ~dinkie ps- has anyone ever had a root canal? i am supposed to get one this coming friday and i was wondering if it hurts an awful lot and if you get pain killers for it and stuff. a response would be appreaciated :) ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 00:14:22, -0500 From: YEEL96E@prodigy.com (OO LALA) Subject: Newbie.... >I read somwhere that there is supposed to be a new Poe album in February >or March. If anyone has information on this, it would be appriciated, >much more than any petty arguements at least. how dare you bring up stuff that isn't NPR!!! sheesh! ;-) welcome to the list, mark! - rose. ____ - ------------------------------------ oolala@aros.net ICQ #4740929 http://www.arosnet.com/~oolala ------------------------------------- visit The Kobran Imperium BBS 1.801.265.1299 ------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 00:42:28, -0500 From: YEEL96E@prodigy.com (OO LALA) Subject: Re: NPR: cottin pickin hands >the word 'fuck' origonally had something to do with the >pilgrims. not sex, and certainly not in the conotation of 'fucking prick >bastard..asshole....etc.' well, not exactly (there's a nifty little book out called "the origin of words"), but we HAVE used it in the context of planting and the like (ie: the farmer fucked the seed into the ground). "fuck" as we know it was used in the same manner in elizabethan times, and i believe it was not used by the pilgrims due to their propriety. >ps- has anyone ever had a root canal? i am supposed to get one this coming >friday and i was wondering if it hurts an awful lot and if you get pain >killers for it and stuff. a response would be appreaciated :) what you probably want to hear: ah, shucks, t'ain't nothin'! you'll feel a little pressure and then it's all over! the truth: first, you'll be numbed. after the procedure the numbness will eventually wear off. this can hurt quite a bit, so take the prescribed pain medication. other than that, there's really nothing to worry about. now, if you had to have a tooth PULLED... hehehehe... ____ - ------------------------------------ oolala@aros.net ICQ #4740929 http://www.arosnet.com/~oolala ------------------------------------- visit The Kobran Imperium BBS 1.801.265.1299 ------------------------------------- ------------------------------ End of angry-psychos-digest V2 #400 ***********************************