From: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org (angry-psychos-digest) To: angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Subject: angry-psychos-digest V2 #396 Reply-To: angry-psychos@smoe.org Sender: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk X-To-Unsubscribe: Send mail to "angry-psychos-digest-request@smoe.org" X-To-Unsubscribe: with "unsubscribe" as the body. angry-psychos-digest Friday, December 12 1997 Volume 02 : Number 396 Today's Subjects: ----------------- [none] ["McDonald's" ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 08:22:16 +0200 From: "McDonald's" Subject: [none] Hey, Flickergrl, you wrote: "i am slightly offended by this entire discussion. what's up with this "vegetarians suck" thing? and what's up with this entire "list is dead?" theory. we were reading in english today ralph waldo emerson's essay on "self- reliance" the teacher was explaining how you can think whatever you want, and that's ok.. as long as you have reasons to back it up...which i believe is totally true. that's wonderful that you think the list is dead and that vegetarians suck. i am happy for u all, but there is no way that i can accept your views without seeing your reasons why. does that make sense? it should. i for one, *am* a vegetarian... and i have been for about a year. just coming out and posting "VEGETARIANS SUCK" is like me just randomly posting something like "PEOPLE WHO LISTEN TO POE" suck. being a vegetarian is a choice, just like listening to POE is a choice. . ." man, girl, where'd you get that insight? i'm impressed cuz you said it all! keep it up! we need clear thinkers and freedom fighters and people who cut through the crap and get to the heart of the thing! personally i thing poe is a bit over the top, emerson's okay. do you write? you should. and i can't give up meat. should i? cheers. mackie ------------------------------ End of angry-psychos-digest V2 #396 ***********************************