From: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org (angry-psychos-digest) To: angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Subject: angry-psychos-digest V2 #163 Reply-To: angry-psychos@smoe.org Sender: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-angry-psychos-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk X-To-Unsubscribe: Send mail to "angry-psychos-digest-request@smoe.org" X-To-Unsubscribe: with "unsubscribe" as the body. angry-psychos-digest Thursday, May 15 1997 Volume 02 : Number 163 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: Whats w/all of these traitors?? (KICK JILL OUT!) ["Shaun P. Orton" ] POE Review Available ["Evan E. Zelig" ] Bands and such.. [Lisa Golmen ] discrimination in music [Flickergrl@aol.com] Don't Flame Becky! ["PadmaT" ] Re: discrimination in music [Rebecca Lynn Clark ] Re: Psycholove or Flames? ["Allan Grimm (The Reaper)" ] FW: Psycholove or Flames? ["PadmaT" ] Re: Psycholove or Flames? [MCOB ] *NPR* This tripped me out... [MCOB ] RE: Psycholove or Flames? ["PadmaT" ] traitors on the list [lush@dfn.com (lush)] Rochester K-Choice show? [radiof@pipeline.com] Re: *NPR* This tripped me out... ["Ed Hurtley" ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 23:29:30 -0600 From: "Shaun P. Orton" Subject: Re: Whats w/all of these traitors?? (KICK JILL OUT!) Josh Ling wrote: > > At 03:34 PM 5/14/97 -0500, Jason Capriotti wrote: > >Sorry, I just *HATE* Bush with a passion. They suck! > > No they don't suck. In your opinion you think they suck. > Everyone has their own opinions when it comes to music. I > personally don't like Bush either but I don't put other people > down for liking them. > > -Josh Who cares about BUSH!!! People have different tastes, let them be. JUST DONT TALK ABOUT BUSH ON POE'S LIST. Bush fans probably dont talk about POE. This list is for/about POE, not BUSH. LET IT GO!!! Shaun :) ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 22:09:44 +0000 From: oobushoo@juno.com (Bich Ngoc Q Cao) Subject: POE plug on Riki Rachtman (past) Today I heard a POE plug on the Riki Rachtman Radio show in LA. I don't listen to the show much anymore because of its schedule, but I like Riki. When was she on? If anyone knows, please tell me! Thanks, BN ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 22:39:20 +0000 From: oobushoo@juno.com (Bich Ngoc Q Cao) Subject: Re: Whats w/all of these traitors?? (KICK JILL OUT!) Excuse me? I'm a Bush fan and I talk about POE more, probably cuz she's cooler as a person and her music rocks. (Another note: And I don't forever drool over Gavin even if I am a teenaged girl!) I was the weirdo who brought up the Battle of the Bands in the first place. Why did I post it to the POE list? Because I wanted POE to win! Maybe some (or most) of you hate Bush...but who cares. I agree with Shaun though...let's drop it. Shit, then why am I talking about it? :) >Bush fans probably dont talk >about POE. This list is for/about POE, not BUSH. LET IT GO!!! ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 22:41:57 +0000 From: oobushoo@juno.com (Bich Ngoc Q Cao) Subject: Whats w/all of these traitors?? (KICK JILL OUT!) Excuse me? I'm a Bush fan and I talk about POE more, probably cuz she's cooler as a person and her music rocks. (Another note: And I don't forever drool over Gavin even if I am a teenaged girl!) I was the weirdo who brought up the Battle of the Bands in the first place. Why did I post it to the POE list? Because I wanted POE to win! Maybe some (or most) of you hate Bush...but who cares. I agree with Shaun though...let's drop it. Shit, then why am I talking about it? :) bich ngoc PS-Sorry if you got this twice. Juno screwed me up and I had to send it again. >Bush fans probably dont talk >about POE. This list is for/about POE, not BUSH. LET IT GO!!! ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 03:02:01 -0500 From: gluhman Subject: REVERB This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - --------------452C4CF71C80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hey all, Check it out Poe is on HBO!!!There is a pretty good sight on there webpage too. She is on the REVERB show. I am watching it right now I've just seen a flash of Poe, but she should be playing pretty soon. Pavement and the EELS have been on so far I hope Poe is next. Later gotta watch the show. bye Angry Again, Greg Luhman Thank god I just got cable the other day. http://www.hbo.com/reverb/cmp/home.shtml - -- Greg Luhman Has Found your mailbox Find Greg at gluhman@rrnet.com - --------------452C4CF71C80 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii; name="home.shtml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="home.shtml" Content-Base: "http://www.hbo.com/reverb/cmp/home.sht ml" REVERB
 


SoulCoughing: I think one of the very first musical things I can remember, was my dad putting on Herb Albert and the Tijuana Brass

- --------------452C4CF71C80-- ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 02:02:07 -0700 From: "Evan E. Zelig" Subject: POE Review Available Angry-Psychos: Backstage Online is pleased to announce that the POE review from last week's show at Cal State University Long Beach is now up on Backstage Online. A special thank you goes out to Josh Mikkelsen (SPINangst@aol.com) for writing this review. I would also like to announce that as of now POE has more reviews up on Backstage Online than ANY OTHER ARTIST! - -- DONT FORGET TO READ THE INTERVIEW WITH POE FROM LONG BEACH ALSO!!! -- Backstage Online is found at http://206.43.146.101/backstage/ ============================================================================ Evan E. Zelig - ezelig@earthlink.net CHECK OUT BACKSTAGE ONLINE - http://206.43.146.101/backstage/ Among The Top 5% Of All Music Web Sites! Featured In Music Connection Magazine (Vol. XXI, Issue #5) ============================================================================ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 12:44:46 +0200 (MET DST) From: Lisa Golmen Subject: Bands and such.. Well, then... I love Marilyn Manson and NIN and Tori Amos, Fiona Apple and Jewel and Ben Harper, I think the Sneaker Pimps and Veruca Salt and Velvet Belly are AWESOME!, I adore David Bowie, that Hanson-tune..(yes..), Garbage and Ani DiFranco. I dream to the Cure, like listening to Bach, cry to that particular Jennifer Warnes tune and there`s nothing like a lil` bit of jazz for an early Saturday evening... Oh, yeah; and I think Poe is great too.. So, ..wanna kick me off the list..? For my tastes..? Go ahead, then. Lisa G, angry psycho in Norway ************************************************************************ Lisa Golmen * "-Whatcha doin`? Morildveien 22 * -We`re eating lunch. N-6500 Kristiansund * -Whyyyyy? Norway * -Cause it`s our lunchbreak. e-mail:teknikka@online.no * -Whyyyyy? * -Cause we`ve worked hard. * -Whyyyyy? In Reznor we trust * -Got me, kid. * -OkayIloveyoubyebye!!" * *********************************************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 08:16:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Flickergrl@aol.com Subject: discrimination in music hey everyone i have to do a 5 minute speech on discrimination in music... jarrod told me that MTV wouldn't play "angry johnny" during the day because POE was wearing a shirt with a human target on it. but also, during the day, MTV plays all those gangsta rap and R&B videos with shootings and beatings and murders... do u all think i could use that in my speech or something?? help!! if anyone has any ideas let me know.... thanks so much - i'm off to school now. have a nice psychotic day. :) brette ps - also, if anyone knows alot about that boycott on MTV because they said they'd only play R%B and rap videos, because they thought alternative videos were affecting the people in a negative way or something (that's why i heard.. imigh be wrong) let me know... : P ------------------------------ Date: 15 May 1997 07:46:47 -0600 From: "PadmaT" Subject: Don't Flame Becky! It *wasn't* Becky who said Poe was a bitch; it wasn't even an Angry Psycho! Someone on the list--I don't remember who--related a story about a woman named "Rain" at some record company who made that claim; she also said that Poe had one face in business (bitch) and another for her fans (sweetheart). Anyone who flamed Becky should, perhaps, read a *bit* more closely!--and not make bizarre mistakes like attacking the wrong person. Padma _______________________________________________________________________________ At 10:26 PM 5/14/97 -0400, you wrote: >okay, i have recieved numerous flames and such saying that poe was not a >bitch... >1. i never said i thought she was a bitch... >2. i am good friends with her...trust me I KNOW she isn't a bitch >3. She is the 2nd most beautiful person i have ever met in my entire life. > > so in conclusion...PLEASE! stop flaming me... >AP LOVE! > >-becky=)(vinyl sex goddess!) >mother@poe.org Who flamed you? Those of us with common sense know you better than that. WE LOVE YOU, BECKY!!!!!!! - ------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------ Received: by mail.rmc.org with ADMIN;14 May 1997 22:19:47 -0600 Received: from jane.smoe.org (smoe.org [204.167.97.154]) by shore.shore.net (8.8.3/8.8.2) with SMTP id WAA18645; Wed, 14 May 1997 22:52:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost by jane.smoe.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id WAA06312; Wed, 14 May 1997 22:52:36 -0400 Received: by jane.smoe.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Wed, 14 May 1997 22:52:35 -0400 Received: by jane.smoe.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id WAA06272; Wed, 14 May 1997 22:51:58 -0400 Received: from popalex1.linknet.net by jane.smoe.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id WAA06259; Wed, 14 May 1997 22:51:37 -0400 From: proudwolf@linknet.net Received: from dsrvlaf2-4.linknet.net by popalex1.linknet.net; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/06Mar96-1224PM) id AA20972; Wed, 14 May 1997 21:51:51 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 21:51:51 -0500 Message-Id: <9705150251.AA20972@popalex1.linknet.net> X-Sender: proudwolf@popalex1.linknet.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Rebecca Lynn Clark Subject: Re: poe a bitch? hahahaah! Cc: angry-psychos@smoe.org Sender: owner-angry-psychos@smoe.org X-To-Unsubscribe: Send mail to "angry-psychos-request@smoe.org" X-To-Unsubscribe: with "unsubscribe" as the body. Precedence: bulk ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 10:43:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Rebecca Lynn Clark Subject: Re: discrimination in music the original Trigger Happy Jack video was banned from MTV also because the end had poe taking a large knife and stabbing the jar with the little guy in it...she doesn't stab him, just the top of the jar... MTV is so stupid...violent my ass... - -becky=)(vinyl sex goddess!) mother@poe.org @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ $ Listen to PSYCHO on New Rock ACRN $ $ 99.3 caFM Saturday nights 10pm-12 $ $ Check out my web page: $ $ http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~acrn/djs/psycho.html $ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ ~~~~~~~~ =O) ~~~~~~~~~ On Thu, 15 May 1997 Flickergrl@aol.com wrote: > hey everyone > > i have to do a 5 minute speech on discrimination in music... jarrod told me > that MTV wouldn't play "angry johnny" during the day because POE was wearing > a shirt with a human target on it. but also, during the day, MTV plays all > those gangsta rap and R&B videos with shootings and beatings and murders... > do u all think i could use that in my speech or something?? help!! if > anyone has any ideas let me know.... > > thanks so much - i'm off to school now. have a nice psychotic day. :) > > brette > > ps - also, if anyone knows alot about that boycott on MTV because they said > they'd only play R%B and rap videos, because they thought alternative videos > were affecting the people in a negative way or something (that's why i > heard.. imigh be wrong) let me know... : P > ------------------------------ Date: 15 May 1997 08:38:49 -0600 From: "PadmaT" Subject: Psycholove or Flames? Dear Jarrod, Considering the antagonistic tone so many AP messages have had of late, I can't help but wonder if it might be wise to consider adding some operating agreements that APs must abide to. While I fully appreciate the freedom-to-the-nth-degree that the AP list seems to have, might it not be wise to put a stop to the flames, at least to those that are clearly intended to damage other Psychos? There's a difference, I think, between saying "Bush sucks!" and "You suck if you like Bush!" (Personally, I've never even heard Bush's music.) I'm not even necessarily recommending this step, but perhaps we should *consider* a "rule" which states that personal attacks will not be tolerated, while allowing for the widest-possible diversity of opinions. Maybe then, those who delight in trying to injure their fellow Psychos will think twice--being an Angry Psycho does have its advantages (like the opportunity to meet Poe after shows)--and facing the possibility of being ejected from the list might calm them down and encourage them to be more considerate. I'm sending this message to you, personally, and to the list, hoping to generate some thoughtful discussion. Psycholove forever, Padma ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 11:22:45 -0400 (EDT) From: "Allan Grimm (The Reaper)" Subject: Re: Psycholove or Flames? Padma, Good point raised. I think if there is a rule though, there should be a committee to discuss such flames. Sort of a checks&balances type deal. I also think that the first step should be a warning system, then possibly suspension, then ejection. That way, people have time to redeem themselves, or at least appologize for unruley conduct. This way, people can't think that its just one person out to get just them. This is the best idea I can come up with. I'm interested to see others. Talk to all you psychos later. Allan Reaper@poe.org A A A A The greatest trick Check out the /H| \\___A___// |H\ the devil ever Angry Psychos //H| \/==v==\/ |H\\ pulled was @poe.org // H\\ |<>|<>| //H \\ convincing // H \\ \ | / // H \\ the world that // H \\ |\|/| // H \\ he didn't exist // H \\_________|<|>|_________// H \\ - Kevin Spacey *************************V************************* - The Usual * * Suspects /* Allan Grimm *\ //* The Reaper on 99.3 FM ACRN in Athens Ohio. *\\ // * Check out ACRN on the web at * \\ // * http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~acrn * \\ // * A A A A A A * \\ // *******( )( )( )*******************( )( )( )******* \\ // (_)(_)(_) | +-------+ | (_)(_)(_) \\ H ____________ H ________ | +-------+ | ________ H ____________ H H/ \H/ \| +-------+ |/ \H/ \H V V | +-------+ | V V \ \_______/ / I wish I were a superhero \ / ************************** like the X-Men in the comics, \ / * * Cause maybe then I could have ) / * Check out my web page * withstood the blast, But I / / * oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~lg310895 * shattered like an ordinary / / * * sheet of glass, And there's ( / **************************** not enough superglue in the \ ( world. - How Long - POE \ ) ) / ( / V ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 08:19:15 -0700 (MST) From: Jarrod Subject: Re: Psycholove or Flames? Thanks Padma... I really want to defer this to Anthony Amato (amato@poe.org). He has addressed this exact thing a couple of times. Infact a general guidelines email is sent out to all new members. This clearly isn't enough. I personally think that a list that regulates itself is a much more powerful group. We certainly don't need an elitist core that says what goes. Look what happened with Dustin... Jarrod @angry-psychos.com On 15 May 1997, PadmaT wrote: > Dear Jarrod, > > Considering the antagonistic tone so many AP messages have had of late, I > can't help but wonder if it might be wise to consider adding some operating > agreements that APs must abide to. While I fully appreciate the > freedom-to-the-nth-degree that the AP list seems to have, might it not be wise > to put a stop to the flames, at least to those that are clearly intended to > damage other Psychos? There's a difference, I think, between saying "Bush > sucks!" and "You suck if you like Bush!" (Personally, I've never even heard > Bush's music.) > > I'm not even necessarily recommending this step, but perhaps we should > *consider* a "rule" which states that personal attacks will not be tolerated, > while allowing for the widest-possible diversity of opinions. Maybe then, > those who delight in trying to injure their fellow Psychos will think > twice--being an Angry Psycho does have its advantages (like the opportunity to > meet Poe after shows)--and facing the possibility of being ejected from the > list might calm them down and encourage them to be more considerate. > > I'm sending this message to you, personally, and to the list, hoping to > generate some thoughtful discussion. > > Psycholove forever, > > Padma > -- POE chooses to be with us. The possibility of Angry-Psychos... "For us to be with POE." www.poe.org ------------------------------ Date: 15 May 1997 09:32:31 -0600 From: "PadmaT" Subject: FW: Psycholove or Flames? Dear Jarrod, I'm not saying that we *should* necessarily be other than self-regulating. Ideally, that is the best way, I agree. I just hate to see people getting hurt, so I put the question forward. Maybe a suggestion (from you?) should be put to the list requesting that APs flood the mailboxes of those who flame others with admonitions to apologize and desist. I don't know the right answer, but I'm looking! Psycholove, Padma _______________________________________________________________________________ Thanks Padma... I really want to defer this to Anthony Amato (amato@poe.org). He has addressed this exact thing a couple of times. Infact a general guidelines email is sent out to all new members. This clearly isn't enough. I personally think that a list that regulates itself is a much more powerful group. We certainly don't need an elitist core that says what goes. Look what happened with Dustin... Jarrod @angry-psychos.com On 15 May 1997, PadmaT wrote: > Dear Jarrod, > > Considering the antagonistic tone so many AP messages have had of late, I > can't help but wonder if it might be wise to consider adding some operating > agreements that APs must abide to. While I fully appreciate the > freedom-to-the-nth-degree that the AP list seems to have, might it not be wise > to put a stop to the flames, at least to those that are clearly intended to > damage other Psychos? There's a difference, I think, between saying "Bush > sucks!" and "You suck if you like Bush!" (Personally, I've never even heard > Bush's music.) > > I'm not even necessarily recommending this step, but perhaps we should > *consider* a "rule" which states that personal attacks will not be tolerated, > while allowing for the widest-possible diversity of opinions. Maybe then, > those who delight in trying to injure their fellow Psychos will think > twice--being an Angry Psycho does have its advantages (like the opportunity to > meet Poe after shows)--and facing the possibility of being ejected from the > list might calm them down and encourage them to be more considerate. > > I'm sending this message to you, personally, and to the list, hoping to > generate some thoughtful discussion. > > Psycholove forever, > > Padma > -- POE chooses to be with us. The possibility of Angry-Psychos... "For us to be with POE." www.poe.org - ------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------ Received: by mail.rmc.org with ADMIN;15 May 1997 09:19:06 -0600 Received: from localhost (jarrod@localhost) by getnet.com (8.7.4/8.9.0) with SMTP id IAA21349; Thu, 15 May 1997 08:19:15 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 08:19:15 -0700 (MST) From: Jarrod Reply-To: Jarrod To: PadmaT cc: amato@poe.org, Angry-Psychos Subject: Re: Psycholove or Flames? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 11:11:36 -0700 From: MCOB Subject: Re: Psycholove or Flames? I cannot believe that one would want to put any source of regulation on the list. If you are coninually recieveing a flame from a certain person don't read it! Its not as if we don't know who the notes are from before we open them. Throw them away like you would junk mail! End of Story! If someone is being abusive to the entire list then the entire list should flame them! If the most democratic of situations and at the same time the most communist. Put the two cents on my Visa please... Cocky=AE Jarrod wrote: > Thanks Padma... > > I really want to defer this to Anthony Amato (amato@poe.org). He has > addressed this exact thing a couple of times. Infact a general > guidelines > email is sent out to all new members. This clearly isn't enough. > > I personally think that a list that regulates itself is a much more > powerful group. We certainly don't need an elitist core that says > what > goes. Look what happened with Dustin... > > Jarrod > @angry-psychos.com > > On 15 May 1997, PadmaT wrote: > > > Dear Jarrod, > > > > Considering the antagonistic tone so many AP messages have had of > late, I > > can't help but wonder if it might be wise to consider adding some > operating > > agreements that APs must abide to. While I fully appreciate the > > freedom-to-the-nth-degree that the AP list seems to have, might it > not be wise > > to put a stop to the flames, at least to those that are clearly > intended to > > damage other Psychos? There's a difference, I think, between saying > "Bush > > sucks!" and "You suck if you like Bush!" (Personally, I've never > even heard > > Bush's music.) > > > > I'm not even necessarily recommending this step, but perhaps we > should > > *consider* a "rule" which states that personal attacks will not be > tolerated, > > while allowing for the widest-possible diversity of opinions. Maybe > then, > > those who delight in trying to injure their fellow Psychos will > think > > twice--being an Angry Psycho does have its advantages (like the > opportunity to > > meet Poe after shows)--and facing the possibility of being ejected > from the > > list might calm them down and encourage them to be more considerate. > > > > > I'm sending this message to you, personally, and to the list, hoping > > to > > generate some thoughtful discussion. > > > > Psycholove forever, > > > > Padma > > > > -- POE chooses to be with us. > > The possibility of Angry-Psychos... > "For us to be with POE." > > www.poe.org > ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 11:18:10 -0700 From: MCOB Subject: *NPR* This tripped me out... This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - --------------7AA4C6262F9AEF3AACFC6E85 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Follow instructions exactly!!! Do not cheat.... Grab a pen and start! - --------------7AA4C6262F9AEF3AACFC6E85 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Received: from mail6.netcom.com (root@mail6.netcom.com [192.100.81.142]) by sierra.psnw.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA22403 for ; Thu, 15 May 1997 10:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bbdowest.com (mailgw.bbdowest.com [204.31.15.5]) by mail6.netcom.com (8.6.13/Netcom) id KAA23715; Thu, 15 May 1997 10:19:25 -0700 Message-ID: Date: 15 May 1997 10:18:41 -0800 From: "Kim Woerz" Subject: FWD>FW- A little game To: "Mike O'Brien" X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP-QM 3.0.2 Mail*Link(r) SMTP FWD>FW: A little game Try this when you have a spare (!) moment. _______________________________________________________________________________ To: Bob Vivian; cooperc@jostens.com; Angela Glasgow; jonathan@memco.com; orbafmco@aol.com; lmason1000@aol.com; vspond@midway.uchicago.edu From: Dana Fazio on Wed, May 14, 1997 7:01 PM Subject: A little game > >A numbers game -- follow these directions EXACTLY. Don't cheat... >> >>DO NOT SKIP AHEAD. Read this message ONE LINE AT A TIME, and just >>do what it says... If not, you'll feel like a moron and wish you had >>played this simple game. >> >> >>1) Pick a number from 1-9 >> >>2) Subtract 5 >> >>3) Multiply by 3 >> >>4) Square the number (multiply by the same number -- not >>square root) >> >>5) Add the digits until you get only one digit >> (i.e. 64=> 6+4 = 10 => 1+0=1) >> >>6) If the number is less than 5, add five. Otherwise subtract 4. >> >>7) Multiply by 2 >> >>8) Subtract 6 >> >>9) Map the digit to a letter in the alphabet 1=A, 2=B, 3=C, etc... >> >>10) Pick a name of a country that begins with that letter >> >>11) Take the second letter in the country name and think >>of an animal that begins with that letter >> >>12) Think of the color of that animal. >> >>(keep scrolling) >> >>******************************************************************** >>DO NOT SCROLL DOWN >> >> >> UNTIL YOU HAVE COMPLETED >> >> ALL OF THE ABOVE >>******************************************************************** >> >> >> >>Here comes the punchline... NO CHEATING or you'll be sorry. >> >> >>* >> >>* >> >>* >> >>Why are you thinking about a grey elephant from Denmark? > > >Danielle D. Engstrom >**Life is uncertain, eat dessert first** > > Dana Fazio dfazio@tdogs.org - ------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------ Received: by bbdowest.com with SMTP;15 May 1997 10:21:26 -0800 Received: from macgate.csuchico.edu (macgate.CSUChico.EDU [132.241.80.13]) by pulsar.csuchico.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA15400; Thu, 15 May 1997 10:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: 15 May 1997 09:52:42 U From: "Bob Vivian" Subject: FW: A little game To: AccessRush@aol.com, "AD 70" , "Al-SCC Graphics" , "Amanda L. Olio" , "Amy Gage" , "Amy Ollis" , "Angie Gilbert" <102167.154@CompuServe.COM>, anne.skora@cbpr.com, "Becky Repka" , "Britta Justesen" , cherie.britt@ketchum.com, Cherylc@InsyncP.com, chris.hammond@ketchum.com, CLARKCL@aol.com, "Cynthia Oxley" , "Dawn Wilcox" <76435.125@CompuServe.COM>, "Della Miller" , "Denise Apra" , "Edith Fernandez" , evvwine@fix.net, "Frank O'Mahony" , "Garcia, Monique" , GDJunkie@aol.com, "Gina Birtcil" , "Hammond, Chris" , "Heidi Taff" , "Jennifer Jostedt--work" , jill_nightingale@infoworld.com, JoedeeMax@aol.com, "Joshua N. Hohn" , "Katrina Paz" , Kelly_Moser_at_PNSF1@mail.porternovelli.com, kgrunow@thegrid.net, "Kim Woerz" , "Kindle DiGiusto" , "kmiklos" , kmoser@porternovelli.com, kristi.jamason@octel.com, Laini_Nance@arpartners.com, "Lisa McCracken" , "Lisa McCracken @ Godbe Comm" , "Lori Campbell" , "Lori Schach" , loris@apassage.com, "Martha D. Santillan" , Mbowman2@aol.com, "McKenzie, Tiffany" , "Merritt L. Mazzera" , mgarcia@mail.porternovelli.com, mgarcia@porternovelli.com To: "Michele McMahon-Cost" , Michelle.Sparacino@ketchum.com, Miriam_Standish_at_BO-US@ccmgate.busobj.com, "Mrs. Jimi Hendrix" , "Nancy Tourkolias" , PRchrisb@aol.com, "Riveness, Debby" , "Rossi, Lisa A." , schutz@mbtarch.com, "Shana Fain McDonald" , Stacy_Davis@mailgate.patagonia.com, "Stephanie Laub work" , "Stephanie Yoder" , "Stephanie Yoder--correct" , TheRupp@aol.com, TJBURMEIST@aol.com, "Val Schutz" , "Vanessa Gilles" , "White, Danelle" , WRasmus342@aol.com, "Wren London" , "Nancy Tourkolias" , "Debra Johnson" X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP for Quarterdeck Mail; Version 4.0.0 - --------------7AA4C6262F9AEF3AACFC6E85-- ------------------------------ Date: 15 May 1997 12:23:01 -0600 From: "PadmaT" Subject: RE: Psycholove or Flames? Dear Cocky, FYI--My suggestion was not necessarily the best one (which I admitted up-front), and was mostly intended to acknowledge the problem and generate discussion and, hopefully, solutions. I've been particularly troubled by those who deride a person as crap for liking music other than Poe's (what a narrow world it would be if we all listened to exactly the same music!). I like your suggestion--I've been thinking about it already--what I am calling in my head a "Psychoflood", wherein all responsible-minded APs flood a flamer with e-mail messages requesting that the flamer apologize and desist. Only I would take it further than directing it exclusively to those who flame the list-at-large--I think a Psychoflood should be directed at anyone who flames another Psycho. Psycholove forever, Padma _______________________________________________________________________________ I cannot believe that one would want to put any source of regulation on the list. If you are coninually recieveing a flame from a certain person don't read it! Its not as if we don't know who the notes are from before we open them. Throw them away like you would junk mail! End of Story! If someone is being abusive to the entire list then the entire list should flame them! If the most democratic of situations and at the same time the most communist. Put the two cents on my Visa please... Cocky(r) Jarrod wrote: > Thanks Padma... > > I really want to defer this to Anthony Amato (amato@poe.org). He has > addressed this exact thing a couple of times. Infact a general > guidelines > email is sent out to all new members. This clearly isn't enough. > > I personally think that a list that regulates itself is a much more > powerful group. We certainly don't need an elitist core that says > what > goes. Look what happened with Dustin... > > Jarrod > @angry-psychos.com > > On 15 May 1997, PadmaT wrote: > > > Dear Jarrod, > > > > Considering the antagonistic tone so many AP messages have had of > late, I > > can't help but wonder if it might be wise to consider adding some > operating > > agreements that APs must abide to. While I fully appreciate the > > freedom-to-the-nth-degree that the AP list seems to have, might it > not be wise > > to put a stop to the flames, at least to those that are clearly > intended to > > damage other Psychos? There's a difference, I think, between saying > "Bush > > sucks!" and "You suck if you like Bush!" (Personally, I've never > even heard > > Bush's music.) > > > > I'm not even necessarily recommending this step, but perhaps we > should > > *consider* a "rule" which states that personal attacks will not be > tolerated, > > while allowing for the widest-possible diversity of opinions. Maybe > then, > > those who delight in trying to injure their fellow Psychos will > think > > twice--being an Angry Psycho does have its advantages (like the > opportunity to > > meet Poe after shows)--and facing the possibility of being ejected > from the > > list might calm them down and encourage them to be more considerate. > > > > > I'm sending this message to you, personally, and to the list, hoping > > to > > generate some thoughtful discussion. > > > > Psycholove forever, > > > > Padma > > > > -- POE chooses to be with us. > > The possibility of Angry-Psychos... > "For us to be with POE." > > www.poe.org > - ------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------ Received: by mail.rmc.org with ADMIN;15 May 1997 12:13:19 -0600 Received: from jane.smoe.org (daemon@smoe.org [204.167.97.154]) by shore.shore.net (8.8.3/8.8.2) with SMTP id OAA07447; Thu, 15 May 1997 14:12:43 - -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost by jane.smoe.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id OAA17875; Thu, 15 May 1997 14:13:23 -0400 Received: by jane.smoe.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Thu, 15 May 1997 14:13:22 -0400 Received: by jane.smoe.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id OAA17864; Thu, 15 May 1997 14:13:15 -0400 Received: from sierra.psnw.com by jane.smoe.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id OAA17860; Thu, 15 May 1997 14:13:06 -0400 Received: from mike (ct-42.psnw.com [206.43.246.168]) by sierra.psnw.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA25917; Thu, 15 May 1997 11:12:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <337B51D8.60540592@psnw.com> Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 11:11:36 -0700 From: MCOB X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.0b4 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jarrod , angry-psychos@smoe.org Subject: Re: Psycholove or Flames? X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by sierra.psnw.com id LAA25917 Sender: owner-angry-psychos@smoe.org X-To-Unsubscribe: Send mail to "angry-psychos-request@smoe.org" X-To-Unsubscribe: with "unsubscribe" as the body. Precedence: bulk ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 14:29:09 -0400 From: lush@dfn.com (lush) Subject: traitors on the list OK Since some of you aren't comprehending what these people are saying.. nobody ever said anything about kicking the 2 "traitors" off the list because they liked Bush. They said that because these 2 people were posting to Bush's list telling them that Poe would be doing a little ass kickin' if they didn't get thiers in gear. It has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that they liked Bush, or any other band.. It wasn't long ago that we were making up our own lists of GRRRRRRL concerts that we would like to see.. I see more & more stuff about it everyday, and find it quite annoying that it seems what they said was taken for the wrong reasons. I Don't think we should kick anyone off the list, however, I hope Jill & Steph don't ever need anythng from me.. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 14:30:49 +0000 From: radiof@pipeline.com Subject: Rochester K-Choice show? Well everybody going to the Rochester show early check out K-Choice i was them last night in NYC at some specail show. And they were GREAT they are also playing in NYC second week in June. (but the show is 21+). Also if you need tickets to get into the show please e-mail me.. i will give the list to the guys in Blood H.Gang, and i think they will get you in.... Anybody coming to NYC to hang out there are a few good shows coming up so e-mail me. seeya ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 12:39:46 -0700 From: "Ed Hurtley" Subject: Re: *NPR* This tripped me out... How did this work? I'll tell you! From now on, I will have 9 columns, one for each of the initial numbers, it will continue down showing what number each gets after each step 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > 1) Pick a number from 1-9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > 2) Subtract 5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 (Just in here to keep the square in step 4 a reasonable size) > 3) Multiply by 3 - -12 -9 -6 -3 0 3 6 9 12 (Makes the number divisible by 3) > 4) Square the number (multiply by the same number -- not square root) 144 81 36 9 0 9 36 81 144 (Since 3^2 is 9, and any number divisible by 3^2 is also divisible by 9, it makes the result divisible by 9) > 5) Add the digits until you get only one digit > (i.e. 64= 6+4 = 10 = 1+0=1) 9 9 9 9 0 9 9 9 9 (Any number divisible by 9, its digits add to 9, only 0 is odd-man-out) > 6) If the number is less than 5, add five. Otherwise subtract 4. 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 (Since 0 is the only one less than 5, adding 5 makes 5, since 9 is the only one over 5, subtracting 4 makes 5) > 7) Multiply by 2 Gives you 10 on all > 8) Subtract 6 Gives you 4 on all > 9) Map the digit to a letter in the alphabet 1=A, 2=B, 3=C, etc... The fourth letter of the alphabet is 'D' > 10) Pick a name of a country that begins with that letter Hmmm, the only one most people think of right off is 'Denmark' Others? Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic. But how many of you thought of those? Or have even heard of them. > 11) Take the second letter in the country name and think > of an animal that begins with that letter Second letter of 'Denmark' is 'E', and because most people only think elephant. Assuming you thought Denmark, other animals: Eagle, Emu, Echinoderm... Echino-what? Starfish, Sea Urchins, Sand Dollars, etc... > 12) Think of the color of that animal. Elephants are gray, most of them anyway. So, of course, you get: > Why are you thinking about a grey elephant from Denmark? Personally, I got a brown ostrich from the Dominican Republic... ------------------------------ End of angry-psychos-digest V2 #163 ***********************************