From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #9595 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Saturday, August 27 2022 Volume 14 : Number 9595 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Who said smoking has to be unhealthy? ["Anti Tar" Subject: Who said smoking has to be unhealthy? Who said smoking has to be unhealthy? http://thyroidplete.za.com/KJT3_JRRpgMY69sX1ALmpwkPxV5I2Bwy0pl6t7pDIQYG7Vt- http://thyroidplete.za.com/sPSwX98impjg5RvSA4g4EroDfbFTWdT6xEkYvVKruc79i74Xvw rior to the discovery of Kelenken, the skulls of incompletely known large phorusrhacids were reconstructed as scaled up versions of those of smaller, more complete relatives like Psilopterus and Patagornis, as exemplified by a frequently reproduced 1895 sketch of the destroyed skull of the large Phorusrhacos, which was itself based on that of Patagornis. These reconstructions highlighted their assumed very tall beaks, round, high eye sockets, and vaulted braincases, but Kelenken demonstrated the significant difference between the skulls of large and small members of the group. The holotype skull is very massive, and triangular when viewed from above, with the hind portion compressed from top to bottom. The upper beak is very long, exceeding half the total length of the skull, unlike in Mesembriornis and Patagornis, and is longer than that of Phorusrhacos. The ratio between the upper beak and the skull of Kelenken is 0.56, based on the distance between the bony nostril and the front tip. In spite of the crushing from top to bottom, the upper beak is high and very robust, though apparently not as high as in patagornithines, such as P ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #9595 **********************************************