From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #9214 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Wednesday, June 29 2022 Volume 14 : Number 9214 Today's Subjects: ----------------- The WiFiBooster Pro is adaptable to any environment you need. ["Boost WiF] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 07:22:06 -0400 From: "Boost WiFi Speed" Subject: The WiFiBooster Pro is adaptable to any environment you need. The WiFiBooster Pro is adaptable to any environment you need. http://concernest.za.com/Ub1hexqueSS9SWu3VrrFvM-W8p_4qfBGa_BwZKQXVkv_yaIcIQ http://concernest.za.com/5xppCdpy3eT20kgtp9G5wq0F2wtBUJ-ZDeG5IAZp00z7Ae5J ached the Supreme Court when both sides appealed in 1970. The case continued under the name Roe v. Wade instead of being switched to Wade v. Roe. The justices delayed taking action on Roe and a closely related case, Doe v. Bolton, until they had first decided certain other cases. One case they decided first was Younger v. Harris. The justices felt the appeals raised difficult questions on judicial jurisdiction. Another case was United States v. Vuitch, in which they considered the constitutionality of a District of Columbia statute which banned abortion except when the mother's life or health was endangered. The Court upheld the statute on the grounds that the word "health" was not unconstitutionally vague and placed the burden of proof concerning dangers to the life or health of the mother on the prosecutor instead of on the person who had performed the abortion. Justice William O. Douglas wrote a lengthy dissenting opinion to this case. He argued that the right to marital privacy and the limitation of family size from Griswold v. Connecticut also applied here, although he acknowledged that "on the other side is the belief of many that the fetus, once formed, is a member of the human family and that mere personal inconvenience cannot justify the fetus' destruction." He also challenged the majority opinion with a series of hypothetical questions asking whether "health" might also include the stigma of having an illegitimate child, anxiety from the pregnancy being unwanted, the physical work of raising a child, the financial drain from the added expense of another child, and far off health risks that may never actually materialize in a similar fashion to how ri ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #9214 **********************************************