From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #9203 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Monday, June 27 2022 Volume 14 : Number 9203 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Test Your New Survival Tool - FREE ["Survival Tool" Subject: Test Your New Survival Tool - FREE Test Your New Survival Tool - FREE http://gasolate.sa.com/tnrCjDDbt2gU0ROcEA0FqLJ789rQyeYWiXVpN6wBeBT8JYvWUg http://gasolate.sa.com/w4Wxj2eWBqTkLfQX51HlXK3u0KBBk1QrM6gE6S7_F3W5Hp99bA f the Constitution provides that justices "shall hold their offices during good behavior", which is understood to mean that they may serve for the remainder of their lives, until death; furthermore, the phrase is generally interpreted to mean that the only way justices can be removed from office is by Congress via the impeachment process. The Framers of the Constitution chose good behavior tenure to limit the power to remove justices and to ensure judicial independence. No constitutional mechanism exists for removing a justice who is permanently incapacitated by illness or injury, but unable (or unwilling) to resign. The only justice ever to be impeached was Samuel Chase, in 1804. The House of Representatives adopted eight articles of impeachment against him; however, he was acquitted by the Senate, and remained in office until his death in 1811. No subsequent effort to impeach a sitting justices has progressed beyond referral to the Judiciary Committee. (For example, William O. Douglas was the subject of hearings twice, in 1953 and again in 1970; and Abe Fortas resigned while hearings were being organized in 1969.) Because justices have indefinite tenure, timing of vacancies can be unpredictable. Sometimes they arise in quick succession, as in September 1971, when Hugo Black and John Marshall Harlan II left within days of each other ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 05:58:05 -0400 From: "NASA Funded Report" Subject: Unaired News Report exposes MASSIVE military preparations all across the US Unaired News Report exposes MASSIVE military preparations all across the US http://descendary.ru.com/8kYyc3jLHuCjDJXm-z8h__KJIs3pLm16OsQSIoU7oq8IgmvxUQ http://descendary.ru.com/IZARQoTkuYvczpshBGjt3Hp9cBsEKYNc5L5QAgHMubKVdFnibQ der Chief Justices Jay, Rutledge, and Ellsworth (1789b1801), the court heard few cases; its first decision was West v. Barnes (1791), a case involving procedure. As the court initially had only six members, every decision that it made by a majority was also made by two-thirds (voting four to two). However, Congress has always allowed less than the court's full membership to make decisions, starting with a quorum of four justices in 1789. The court lacked a home of its own and had little prestige, a situation not helped by the era's highest-profile case, Chisholm v. Georgia (1793), which was reversed within two years by the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment. The court's power and prestige grew substantially during the Marshall Court (1801b1835). Under Marshall, the court established the power of judicial review over acts of Congress, including specifying itself as the supreme expositor of the Constitution (Marbury v. Madison) and making several important constitutional rulings that gave shape and substance to the balance of power between the federal government and states, notably Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, McCulloch v. Maryland, and Gibbons v. Ogden. The Marshall Court also ended the practice of each justice is ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 04:28:41 -0400 From: "Flight Survey" Subject: Get rewarded: Tell us about your American Airlines experiences! Get rewarded: Tell us about your American Airlines experiences! http://descendary.ru.com/6ecC7ZPLP3EdLtpH1uUsfn2985R17EelrsdxvDk_OIb_UMtwQA http://descendary.ru.com/F4bxHAaixACl339ZkAvzJOZCTX_H2sxo64FYPrqa23bVb3VL2g was while debating the separation of powers between the legislative and executive departments that delegates to the 1787 Constitutional Convention established the parameters for the national judiciary. Creating a "third branch" of government was a novel idea; in the English tradition, judicial matters had been treated as an aspect of royal (executive) authority. Early on, the delegates who were opposed to having a strong central government argued that national laws could be enforced by state courts, while others, including James Madison, advocated for a national judicial authority consisting of tribunals chosen by the national legislature. It was proposed that the judiciary should have a role in checking the executive's power to veto or revise laws. Eventually, the framers compromised by sketching only a general outline of the judiciary, vesting federal judicial power in "one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." They delineated neither the exact powers and prerogatives of the Supreme Court nor the organizati ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 12:12:43 -0400 From: "Regain Control" Subject: Couldnāt stop the cravings causing more to pile onnn.... Couldnbt stop the cravings causing more to pile onnn.... http://gasolate.sa.com/46GQfWDylHzjFs8ECpseSMdlD6fKicIPX9LqdY0Z-PwEHobRnA http://gasolate.sa.com/6Bg5DpBOTUhrhU3NkX420ytKZZfotmizQmBp4ZNfB8PJwgwkfw the behest of Chief Justice Chase and in an attempt by the Republican Congress to limit the power of Democrat Andrew Johnson, Congress passed the Judicial Circuits Act of 1866, providing that the next three justices to retire would not be replaced, which would thin the bench to seven justices by attrition. Consequently, one seat was removed in 1866 and a second in 1867. Soon after Johnson left office, the new president Ulysses S. Grant, a Republican, signed into law the Judiciary Act of 1869. This returned the number of justices to nine (where it has since remained), and allowed Grant to immediately appoint two more judges. President Franklin D. Roosevelt attempted to expand the court in 1937. His proposal envisioned the appointment of one additional justice for each incumbent justice who reached the age of 70 years 6 months and refused retirement, up to a maximum bench of 15 justices. The proposal was ostensibly to ease the burden of the docket on elderly judges, but the actual purpose was widely understood as an effort to "pack" the court with justices who would support Roosevelt's New Deal. The plan, usually called the "court-packing plan", failed in Congress after members of Roosevelt's own Democratic Party believed it to be unconstitutional. It was defeated 70b20 in the United States Senate, and the Senate Judiciary Committee reported that it was "essential to the continuance of our constitutional democracy" that the proposal "be so emphatically rejected that its parallel will never again be presented to the free representatives of the fre ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 03:45:58 -0400 From: "Consumer Feedback" Subject: Shipped! Your Lowes Reward Shipped! Your Lowes Reward http://andredging.ru.com/Tio1BAs_Aji-ad0pRD7VIE2ms8iC4-aN0cH0VTDTT2XVMfggjw http://andredging.ru.com/WxjanWooSNKQu59Szn7FL9FBHB6TAs5b6sCnLDd23mL2YuRh8Q preme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases, as well as over state court cases that involve a point of federal law. It also has original jurisdiction over a narrow range of cases, specifically "all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party." The court holds the power of judicial review, the ability to invalidate a statute for violating a provision of the Constitution. It is also able to strike down presidential directives for violating either the Constitution or statutory law. However, it may act only within the context of a case in an area of law over which it has jurisdiction. The court may decide cases having political overtones but has ruled that it does not have power to decide non-justiciable political questions. Established by Article Three of the United States Constitution, the composition and procedures of the Supreme Court were initially established by the 1st Congress through the Judiciary Act of 1789. As later set by the Judiciary Act of 1869, the court consists of the chief justice of the United States and eight associate justices. Each justice has lifetime tenure, meaning they remain on the court until they die, retire, resign, or are removed from office. When a vacancy occurs, the p ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:32:15 -0400 From: "Presentation Creator" Subject: Do you use PowerPoint or Keynote? Do you use PowerPoint or Keynote? http://mulating.ru.com/pTOk-egt--YV9vmx_RAwkWUGAOhnNvDeCVqyd9U8EpCcQDDmIg http://mulating.ru.com/PDIr7wySpH8r7j_eJpxayPeaYkU3BxtvbML5jiM64pbbHkVpKA arliest fossils attributed to green algae date from the Precambrian (ca. 1200 mya). The resistant outer walls of prasinophyte cysts (known as phycomata) are well preserved in fossil deposits of the Paleozoic (ca. 250b540 mya). A filamentous fossil (Proterocladus) from middle Neoproterozoic deposits (ca. 750 mya) has been attributed to the Cladophorales, while the oldest reliable records of the Bryopsidales, Dasycladales) and stoneworts are from the Paleozoic. The oldest known fossils of embryophytes date from the Ordovician, though such fossils are fragmentary. By the Silurian, fossils of whole plants are preserved, including the simple vascular plant Cooksonia in mid-Silurian and the much larger and more complex lycophyte Baragwanathia longifolia in late Silurian. From the early Devonian Rhynie chert, detailed fossils of lycophytes and rhyniophytes have been found that show details of the individual cells within the plant organs and the symbiotic association of these plants with fungi of the order Glomales. The Devonian period also saw the evolution of leaves and roots, and the first modern tree, Archaeopteris. This tree with fern-like foliage and a trunk with conifer-like wood was heterosporous producing spores of two ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 06:39:55 -0400 From: "Your Side?" Subject: Sleeping in THIS position linked to Alzheimerās Sleeping in THIS position linked to Alzheimerbs http://foundo.za.com/uC6DKCEC7QDjBVVUho8C3J2-lteOYTUddQJX1KaIojUkFXXt7Q http://foundo.za.com/FTBVAsRzwlOWIO84atFnGBYw2cjB-5A7TBGb1lpDeWYbDZnYaw riginal classification placed the fungi within the Plantae, since they were unquestionably neither animals or minerals and these were the only other alternatives. With 19th century developments in microbiology, Ernst Haeckel introduced the new kingdom Protista in addition to Plantae and Animalia, but whether fungi were best placed in the Plantae or should be reclassified as protists remained controversial. In 1969, Robert Whittaker proposed the creation of the kingdom Fungi. Molecular evidence has since shown that the most recent common ancestor (concestor), of the Fungi was probably more similar to that of the Animalia than to that of Plantae or any other kingdom. Whittaker's original reclassification was based on the fundamental difference in nutrition between the Fungi and the Plantae. Unlike plants, which generally gain carbon through photosynthesis, and so are called autotrophs, fungi do not possess chloroplasts and generally obtain carbon by breaking down and absorbing surrounding materials, and so are called heterotrophic saprotrophs. In addition, the substructure of multicellular fungi is different from that of plants, taking ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #9203 **********************************************