From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #6843 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Friday, June 25 2021 Volume 14 : Number 6843 Today's Subjects: ----------------- African Tribesmen Teach White Chick Member Elongation Secret ["Penis Elon] See clearer at night with this state-of-the-art night vision aid ["Night ] SmartSnake HD have Additional Magnet, Hook and Mirror Heads Included ["Be] WOW! These people are seriously interested in you! ["Asian Dating Team" <] EARN UP 120% DAILY PROFIT [Mike ] Last.Chance.Last.Day.to.Grab.this.BIG.Promo.50%.off.!! ["Huusk.Knives" Subject: African Tribesmen Teach White Chick Member Elongation Secret African Tribesmen Teach White Chick Member Elongation Secret http://batterycourse.us/VseY42Iz_qlcwRQ7X8RT-bO3IfZG5yN08zq1bnAo-7i49iM http://batterycourse.us/nIdnKEI8-ty12Y827b5dq8wr7nlqI_uKQNLWVFM0EzWeM7s erious evolutionary thinking originated with the works of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, who was the first to present a coherent theory of evolution. He posited that evolution was the result of environmental stress on properties of animals, meaning that the more frequently and rigorously an organ was used, the more complex and efficient it would become, thus adapting the animal to its environment. Lamarck believed that these acquired traits could then be passed on to the animal's offspring, who would further develop and perfect them. However, it was the British naturalist Charles Darwin, combining the biogeographical approach of Humboldt, the uniformitarian geology of Lyell, Malthus's writings on population growth, and his own morphological expertise and extensive natural observations, who forged a more successful evolutionary theory based on natural selection; similar reasoning and evidence led Alfred Russel Wallace to independently reach the same conclusions. Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection quickly spread through the scientific community and soon became a central axiom of the rapidly developing science of biology. The basis for modern genetics began with the work of Gregor Mendel, who presented his paper, "Versuche C Subject: See clearer at night with this state-of-the-art night vision aid Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 03:53:51 -0700 From: "Best Borescopes" Subject: SmartSnake HD have Additional Magnet, Hook and Mirror Heads Included SmartSnake HD have Additional Magnet, Hook and Mirror Heads Included http://vitiliged.buzz/bxiQuCz4kPRHp5R5MAsD_gK0qrF3HeuaUYWbuHmt6UBX7Eyu http://vitiliged.buzz/-aaBA6cMVAGtzObWiya8H7oUtyzYjHqsbXUf7PurjyYbpD9I villea juniperina, commonly known as juniper or juniper-leaf grevillea or prickly spider-flower, is a plant of the family Proteaceae native to eastern New South Wales and south-eastern Queensland in Australia. Scottish botanist Robert Brown described the species in 1810, and seven subspecies are recognised. One subspecies, G. j. juniperina, is restricted to Western Sydney and environs and is threatened by loss of habitat and housing development. A small prickly leaved shrub between 0.2 and 3 m (8 in to 10 ft) high, G. juniperina grows generally on clay-based or alluvial soils in eucalypt woodland. The flower heads, known as inflorescences, appear from winter to early summer and are red, orange or yellow. Birds visit and pollinate the flowers. Grevillea juniperina plants are killed by bushfire, regenerating afterwards from seed. Grevillea juniperina adapts readily to cultivation and has been important in horticulture as it is the parent of many popular garden hybrids. Contents 1 Description 2 Taxonomy 3 Distribution and habitat 4 Ecology 5 Cultivation 6 References 6.1 Cited text 7 External links Description Grevillea juniperina has a spreading or erect habit (growth form) and it grows to between 0.2 and 3 m (8 in to 10 ft) in height. The branchlets are thick and sturdy. The prickly leaves are generally stiff, and are 0.5b3.5 cm (1?4b1+3?8 in) long and 0.5b6 mm (1?32b1?4 in) wide. They are crowded along the stems. Flowering occurs throughout the year, peaking between mid winter and early summer, though varies between the different subspecies. Subspecies allojohnsonii flowers from September to February, subspecies trinervis flowers from August to December, and subspecies juniperina, amphitricha, sulphurea, villosa and fortis flower in August and September. The spider-flower arrangement of the inflorescence has several individual flowers emerging from a central rounded flower headbreminiscent of the legs of a spider. The flowers are red, pink, orange, yellow or greenish, and are mostly terminalbarising on the ends of stemsbthough they occasionally arise from axillary buds. They are 2.5b3.5 cm (1b1+3?8 in) long. The perianth is finely furred on the outside, while the pistil is smooth; it is 1.5b2.7 cm (5?8b1+1?8 in) long. Flowering is followed by the development of seed pods, each capsule is 10b18 mm (3?8b3?4 in) long, and releases one or two seeds when ripe. The narrow oval seed is 7.5b12 mm (1?4b1?2 in) and 2.2b3.3 mm (1?16b1?8 in) wide, with a swelling at the apex and a short wing. Both surfaces are covered with tiny hairs. Similar species include the Wingello grevillea (Grevillea molyneuxii), which can be distinguished by its prominent midvein on the leaf undersurface, and the red spider-flower (G. speciosa), which has wider leaves with lateral veins and longer pistil. Taxonomy Low spreading shrub Low spreading habit of a form growing in Kanangra-Boyd National Park The type specimen for this species was collected from the Port Jackson area (Sydney district) and was described by botanist Robert Brown in 1810, who gave it the specific epithet juniperina which alludes to its juniper-like foliage. Likewise it is commonly known as juniper- or juniper-leaf grevillea, as well as prickly spider-flower. The lectotype was selected by Don MacGillivray in 1993 from a collection by George Caley in 1803 11 km (7 mi) northwest of Prospect in what is now Sydney's outer western suburbs. Brown placed it in the series Lissostylis in his 1810 work Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae et Insulae Van Diemen. English botanist and explorer Allan Cunningham collected what he called Grevillea sulphurea in 1822 near Coxs River in the Bathurst area, where it grew alongside G. rosmarinifolia and G. arenaria subspecies canescens. This was later synonymised with G. juniperina, before being recognised as a distinct subspecies. George Bentham placed G. juniperina in Section Lissostylis in his 1870 Flora Australiensis. This section has become the Linearifolia group of 45 species of shrub in southeastern Australia. Within this group, G. juniperina is classified in the Speciosa subgroup, five species of bird-pollinated grevilleas found in eastern Australia. The others are G. molyneuxii, G. dimorpha, G. oleoides and G. speciosa. There are seven subspecies of Grevillea juniperina, six of which have been recogn ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 00:46:11 -0700 From: "Asian Dating Team" Subject: WOW! These people are seriously interested in you! WOW! These people are seriously interested in you! http://smartsocitey.us/POAI92kegrAdjRdEg7ESGqW9_iv8mD5X3rXyH8myob5b1sRD http://smartsocitey.us/Hgmkhoj_VIHMQaEjCFA1YNHwehaQCznG1UKD-gvmtJAZSVpN he police get information that 10 tehsildars across Maharashtra have been mysteriously kidnapped. However, no sooner are they mysteriously returned b except the most corrupt officer, who is hanged. The police get a CD from mystery man 'Gabbar', who says his mission is to target corrupt officers. Police driver Sadhuram is convinced he can crack the mystery of who is Gabbar, even though his superior officers humiliate and insult him in front of the other officers. National College professor Aditya Singh Rajput thrashes some goons who try to vandalize college property while he demonstrates his Physics lecture to the students. On his way home one night, he encounters a young lawyer, Shruti, who is in a hurry to take a pregnant woman to the hospital, but the woman's water breaks, and Shruti, claiming to be aware of the delivery process, sends Aditya out. With the delivery being successful, they drive to the hospital, but before Shruti can thank Aditya, she finds him gone. Some days later, she bumps into Aditya again during a fight, and they begin dating. Sadhuram in the meantime finds out there's one honest officer in each department across the state, and is convinced that each of these honest officers has a link to Gabbar. One fateful day, Aditya and Shruti are checking out of a roadside cafC) when Shruti is hurt in a minor accident, and Aditya takes her to the Patil Hospital where a female doctor insists on taking a number of expensive tests despite minimal injury. Aditya happens to overhear a doctor try to suggest the rather expensive Caesarean section delivery and is soon convinced of the hospital staff's dirty tricks when he notices a father-daughter duo being informed of the mother's death only after an expensive bill was paid. He deliberately checks in a poor woman's dead husband as a patient; unaware of his trap, the hospital tries to swindle money out of Aditya by pretending to treat the already dead man, making him pay heavily for tests and medicines. However, Aditya shows them the death certificate as a proof of their knowingly admitting a dead man. The young owner of the hospital, Vikas Patil, is furious when Aditya releases the video of the hospital's corruption to the media despite having struck a deal with him. Vikas is murdered by the enraged public, and his father Digvijay Patil sees Aditya in the hospital CCTV footage, only to realize this is the same m ------------------------------ Date: 25 Jun 2021 01:35:19 +0530 From: Mike Subject: EARN UP 120% DAILY PROFIT Hi, Would you rather get paid $1,000,000 right now or making 20-120% of your investment daily/weekly for the rest of your life? I'll take option B. That's what passive income is. Find a way to make passive income, it'll change your life. Allcoin-Invest is made so even investors with zero trading experience are successfully making a profit. Guarantees fix hourly interest for investors regardless of market conditions. I can email you my referral link so you signup and I get a referral bonus. Mike ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:54:50 +0000 From: "Huusk.Knives" Subject: Last.Chance.Last.Day.to.Grab.this.BIG.Promo.50%.off.!! Last.Chance.Last.Day.to.Grab.this.BIG.Promo.50%.off.!! http://byebyebark.us/H0OZID_yh3Oq3hQgdSzYWr9e0c1PuriiSFN7zZ6IXxrFpdLP http://byebyebark.us/b5z1EQ08wgJSlrmLSwrdIccIRdOhpTH7O7bf-HLBcmoSaxg oving force behind the New Rochelle issue was the Westchester County Coin Club, including collectors Julius Guttag (of Guttag Brothers, a prominent New York City coin dealer) and Pitt M. Skipton, who planned the issue to avoid the abuses of earlier commemoratives. The issue originated in discussions between club members, who were aware of the many commemoratives being issued in the mid-1930s. The idea was attractive as the piece would help fund the 250th anniversary celebrations in New Rochelle, rather than draw on taxpayers strained by the Depression. The coin club, at its November 1935 meeting, appointed Skipton as a one-man committee to make the necessary contacts to gain authorization for the issue.LegislationStatue of Jacob Leisler, New Rochelle, New YorkBills for a New Rochelle half dollar were introduced in both houses of Congress in January 1936; in the Senate by Royal S. Copeland and in the House by Charles D. Millard, both of New York. Skipton had contacted both legislators, who had agreed to help, though Senator Copeland had warned, "The President is pretty hard-boiled on this subject." The House bill reported back favorably from the Committee on Coinage, Weights, and Measures on February 17, 1936, proposed amendments increasing the authorized mintage from 20,000 to 25,000 and requiring there to be a committee of not less than three people to order the coins on behalf of New Rochelle. The House adopted the amendments and passed the bill without debate on March 16, 1936. The Senate bill was referred to the Committee on Banking and Currency; it was one of several commemorative half dollar bills to be considered on March 11, 1936, by a subcommittee led by Colorado's Alva B. Adams. Senator Adams had heard of the commemorative coin abuses of the mid-1930s, when issuers increased the number of pieces needed for a complete set by having them issued with different dates and mint marks; authorizing legislation placed no prohibition on this. Lyman W. Hoffecker, a Texas coin dealer and official of the American Numismatic Association, testified and told the subcommittee that some issues, like the Oregon Trail pieces, had been issued over the course of years with different dates and mint marks. Other issues had been entirely bought up by single dealers, and some low-mintage varieties of commemoratives were selling at high prices. The many varieties and inflated prices for some issues that resulted from these practices angered collectors trying to keep their collections current. The Senate took no further action on Copeland's bill, but on March 26, 1936, Senator Adams reported back the House bill to the Senate, entirely rewriting it to incorporate protections such as requiring all of the New Rochelle coins to have the same date and mint mark, and to be issued to the sponsoring organization in lots of not less than 5,000. He recommended that future commemorative coin bills have similar protections. The Senate considered the bill on March 27, the fifth in a series of six commemorative coin bills being considered by that body, and like the others, the New Rochelle bill was amended and passed without debate or dissent. As the two houses had passed different versions, the bill returned to the House of Representatives. On April 17, 1936, John J. Cochran of Missouri moved that the House agree to the Senate amendment, though with one change: that instead of no less than 5,000 being issued at one time, no less than 25,000 could be issued at one time. Cochran explained to Marion A. Zioncheck of Washington state that this was for the protection of the collector. The House agreed without further debate, and on April 27, 1936, on the motion of Adams, so did the Senate. President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the bill into law on May 5, 1936. According to coin dealer B. Max Mehl in his 1937 volume on commemoratives, "Having visited New Rochelle on two or three occasions, I don't quite comprehend why this town rates a commemorative coin ... But apparently it must have, and it does have, some active collectors who apparently knew the art of string-pulling and got the bill for the coin through Cong ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #6843 **********************************************