From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #5555 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Wednesday, December 23 2020 Volume 14 : Number 5555 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Zero Sugar Chocolate Trial ["Free Chocolate" ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 05:53:58 -0500 From: "Free Chocolate" Subject: Zero Sugar Chocolate Trial Zero Sugar Chocolate Trial http://nerveshield.buzz/M4ZR7ca07RdyH-MEKSgPqSQeC6BExx8V-tqHXiRk11aA2FFK http://nerveshield.buzz/9dfikPWU1ss3JOLWo9-O4eKu4pXU3OVVQzlnU6-iAvT_yiyf ting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium (currently calculated to be 13 times the mass of Jupiter for objects with the same isotopic abundance as the Sun) that orbit stars or stellar remnants are "planets" (no matter how they formed). The minimum mass and size required for an extrasolar object to be considered a planet should be the same as that used in the Solar System. Substellar objects with true masses above the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium are "brown dwarfs", no matter how they formed or where they are located. Free-floating objects in young star clusters with masses below the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium are not "planets", but are "sub-brown dwarfs" (or whatever name is most appropriate). This working definition has since been widely used by astronomers when publishing discoveries of exoplanets in academic journals. Although temporary, it remains an effective working definition until a more permanent one is formally adopted. It does not address the dispute over the lower mass limit, and so it steered clear of the controversy regarding objects within the Solar System. This definition also makes no comment on the planetary status of objects orbiting brown dwarfs, such as 2M1207b. One definition of a sub-brown dwarf is a planet-mass object that formed through cloud collapse rather than accretion. This formation distinction between a sub-brown dwarf and a planet is not universally agreed upon; astronomers are divided into two camps as whether to consider the formation process of a planet as part of its division in classification. One reason for the dissent is that often it may not be possible to determine the formation process. For example, a planet formed by accretion around a star may get ejected from the system to become free-floating, and likewise a sub-brown dwarf that formed on its own in a star cluster through cloud collapse may get captured into orbit around a star. One study suggests that objects above 10 MJup formed through gravitational instability and should not be thought of as planets. The 13 Jupiter-mass cutoff represents an average mass rather than a precise threshold value. Large objects will fuse most of their deuterium and smaller ones will fuse only a little, and the 13 MJ value is somewhere in between. In fact, calculations show that an object fuses 50% of its initial deuterium content when the total mass ranges between 12 and 14 MJ. The amount of deuterium fused depends not only on mass but also on the com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:36:48 +0800 From: =?GB2312?B?sszU89Pu?= Subject: =?GB2312?B?tPq/qtXmt6LGsQ==?= 4z?*Uf5DU}9f7"F1,