From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #5306 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Wednesday, November 11 2020 Volume 14 : Number 5306 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Get Your Free Belly-Band Holster! ["Belly Holster Ecom" Subject: Get Your Free Belly-Band Holster! Get Your Free Belly-Band Holster! http://hotixpro.buzz/o39UvSIME37ZzbpszJrn3zoYPTXqeNG1NtnuVWgDPGnoUJjL http://hotixpro.buzz/Q4kz5jY7jFEZJcWSQp1vrqk4sak7sTY-P-vQ0ivhGfXsYTHP In some cases, the development of tort law has spurred lawmakers to create alternative solutions to disputes. For example, in some areas, workers' compensation laws arose as a legislative response to court rulings restricting the extent to which employees could sue their employers in respect of injuries sustained during employment. In other cases, legal commentary has led to the development of new causes of action outside the traditional common law torts. These are loosely grouped into quasi-torts or liability torts. Negligence Main article: Negligence Negligence is a tort which arises from the breach of the duty of care owed by one person to another from the perspective of a reasonable person. Although credited as appearing in the United States in Brown v. Kendall, the later Scottish case of Donoghue v Stevenson AC 562, followed in England, brought England into line with the United States and established the 'tort of negligence' as opposed to negligence as a component in specific actions. In Donoghue, Mrs. Donoghue drank from an opaque bottle containing a decomposed snail and claimed that it had made her ill. She could not sue Mr. Stevenson for damages for breach of contract and instead sued for negligence. The majority determined that the definition of negligence can be divided into four component parts that the plaintiff must prove to establish negligence. The elements in determining the liability for negligence are:[citation needed] The plaintiff was owed a duty of care through a special relationship (e.g. doctor-patient) or some other principle There was a dereliction or breach of that duty The tortfeasor directly caused the injury [but for the defendant's actions, the plaintiff would not have suffered an injury]. The plaintiff suffered damage as a result of that breach The damage was not too remote; there was proximate cause to show the breach caused the damage ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #5306 **********************************************