From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #5303 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Wednesday, November 11 2020 Volume 14 : Number 5303 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Eliminating this common veggie from your diet as of today. ["Dangerous Fo] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 07:54:49 -0500 From: "Dangerous Foods" Subject: Eliminating this common veggie from your diet as of today. Eliminating this common veggie from your diet as of today. http://podgoric.icu/p2O81NjXSICNtUr2W9m1IqI507DVunjOO9CdyxtpM56fIRzX http://podgoric.icu/KsQo4y2gA_ef43zczo1ernS3wKeBD20s3Sz7z5YID2hUxZh2 In an action for defamation per se, the law recognizes that certain false statements are so damaging that they create a presumption of injury to the plaintiff's reputation, allowing a defamation case to proceed to verdict with no actual proof of damages. Although laws vary by state, and not all states recognize defamation per se, there are four general categories of false statement that typically support a per se action: accusing someone of a crime; alleging that someone has a foul or loathsome disease; adversely reflecting on a person's fitness to conduct their business or trade; and imputing serious sexual misconduct. If the plaintiff proves that such a statement was made and was false, to recover damages the plaintiff need only prove that someone had made the statement to any third party. No proof of special damages is required. However, to recover full compensation a plaintiff should be prepared to prove actual damages. As with any defamation case, truth remains an absolute defense to defamation per se. This means that even if the statement would be considered defamatory per se if false, if the defendant establishes that it is in fact true, an action for defamation per se cannot survive. The conception of what type of allegation may support an action for defamation per se can evolve with public policy. For example, in May 2012 an appeals court in New York, citing changes in public policy with regard to homosexuality, ruled that describing someone as gay is not defamation ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #5303 **********************************************