From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #4530 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Wednesday, July 8 2020 Volume 14 : Number 4530 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Stop the 4 Things that are Making it worse ["Cellulite Gone" Subject: Stop the 4 Things that are Making it worse Stop the 4 Things that are Making it worse http://gpspower.bid/n3MvBhZmYasST5hHg-BOO_nYLIXbvAlVAyEWkktSfe6TZCYb http://gpspower.bid/rqCsqHNFBpBlhxqhQh8XH0EyQXXTc25ytcYCJ53b_NrAY6d1 tural systems. It is argued that ethical and legal theories that recognize both sets of rights will better guide human behavior to recognize and respect humans' interconnected relationships with each other and the natural world. As with the recognition of human rights, legal scholars find that recognition of the rights of nature alters the framework of human laws and practices. Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe theorized further that bchoosing to accord nature a fraternal rather than an exploited role(...) might well make us different persons from the manipulators and subjugators we are in danger of becoming.b 20th and 21st century developments The adoption of the UDHR in 1948 globally formalized recognition of broad categories of inalienable human rights. These include recognition that bll human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights,b that bveryone has the right to life, liberty and security of person,b and that bveryone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted.b Recognition of fundamental rights in bsoft lawb instruments such as the UDHR provided guidance to nations around the world, who have since developed constitutional provisions, statutes, court decisions, regulations, and other bodies of law based on the UDHR and the human rights it champions. Decades later, USC law professor Christopher Stone called for recognition of the legal standing and associated rights of the natural world as well, consistent with the "successive extension of rights" throughout legal history. As was done in the UDHR, Stone outlined the necessary elements of nature's participation in human legal systems, describing such a legal system as necessarily including: recognition of injuries as subject to redress by public body, standing to institute legal actions (with guardians acting on behalf of the natural entity), redress calculated for natural entity's own damages, and relief running to the benefit of the injured natural entity. In addition to Stone's legal work, other late 20th and early 21st century drivers of the rights of nature movement include indigenous perspectives and the work of the indigenous rights movement; the writings of Arne Naess and the Deep Ecology movement; Thomas Berry's 2001 jurisprudential call for recognizing the laws of nature as the bprimary text;b the publication of Cormac Cullinan's Wild Law book in 2003, followed by the creation of an eponymous legal association in the UK; growing concern about corporate power through the expansion of legal personhood for corporations; adoption by U.S. communities of local laws addressing rights of nature; the creation of the Global Alliance of the Rights of Nature in 2010 (a nonprofit advancing rights on nature worldwide); and moun ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 02:07:30 -0400 From: "Video Marketing Blaster" Subject: How To Rank Videos On Google With 3 ONLY CLICKS How To Rank Videos On Google With 3 ONLY CLICKS http://airfreez.today/3xH-OjrWQzy0gUm2qK3LqUMi5fQD-SSFjThfOREpc8u1wpMy http://airfreez.today/8-ns3z0z_dl4JWhwAVYvCgtXNnG2tK1_0gEY229Kok2fOSlt ia Supreme Court took up a climate change case by a group of children and young adults that also raised fundamental rights issues. In addition to making legal findings related to human rights, the Court found that the Colombian Amazon is a bbsubject of rightsb, entitled to protection, conservation, maintenance and restoration.b It recognized the special role of Amazon deforestation in creating greenhouse gas emissions in Colombia, and as a remedy ordered the nation and its administrative agencies to ensure a halt to all deforestation by 2020. The Court further allocated enforcement power to the plaintiffs and affected communities, requiring the agencies to report to the communities and empowering them to inform the Court if the agencies were not meeting their deforestation targeing adoption of nature's rights language in its 2009 Constitution, Bolivia's Legislature passed in 2010 the Law of the Rights of Mother Earth, Act No. 071. Bolivia followed this broad outline of nature's rights with the 2012 Law of Mother Earth and Integral Development for Living Well, Act. No. 300, which provided some implementation details consistent with nature's rights. It states in part that the bviolation of the rights of Mother Earth, as part of comprehensive development for Living Well, is a violation of public law and the collective and individual rights.b While a step forward, this enforcement piece has not yet risen to the level of a specific enforcement mechutes or constitutional provisions in India specifically identified rights of nature. Nevertheless, the India Supreme Court in 2012 set the stage for cases to come on rights of nature, finding that bEnvironmental justice could be achieved only if we drift away from the principle of anthropocentric to ecocentric. . . humans are part of nature and non-human has intrinsic value.b The Uttarakhand High Court applied the principle of ecocentric law in 2017, recognizing the legal personhood of the Ganga and Yamuna rivers and ecosystems, and calling them bliving human entitiesb and juridical and moral persons. The Court quickly followed with similar judgments for the riversb associated glaciers, including the Gangotri and Yamunotri, and other natural systems. While the India Supreme Court stayed the Ganga and Yamuna judgment at the request of local authorities, those authorities supported the proposed legal status in concept but were seeking implementation gui ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 04:49:25 -0400 From: "Fidelity Life" Subject: Let our life insurance agents find you an affordable plan today! Let our life insurance agents find you an affordable plan today! http://techvisions.bid/7A7u76tq5gIpyqX_FP6I-I1nt4mswUMV_rYm6LryeG86gg http://techvisions.bid/Qq8DIAt3cBHdBoYE1i577A6yCYDXtwNGFU1f04bC9vb47g A Roomette, in the historically correct sense of the word, is a private room for a single passenger, containing a single seat, a folding bed, a toilet (not in a private cubicle of its own), and a washbasin. When a traditional Roomette is in night mode, the bed blocks access to the toilet. Like open sections, Roomettes are placed on both sides of the car, with a corridor down the center. Duplex Roomettes, a Pullman-produced precursor to the Slumbercoach, are staggered vertically, with every second accommodation raised a few feet above the car's floor level, in order to make slightly more efficient use of the space. Single-passenger Slumbercoach accommodations are a particularly spartan form of roomette; Slumbercoaches also included a few two-passenger units. Compartments and Double Bedrooms Pullman private compartment from c.1950s. Compartments and Double Bedrooms are private rooms for two passengers, with upper and lower berths, washbasins, and private toilets, placed on one side of the car, with the corridor running down the other side (thus allowing the accommodation to be slightly over two thirds the width of the car). Frequently, these accommodations have movable partitions allowing adjacent accommodations to be combined into a suite. Drawing Rooms and Larger Accommodations A Drawing Room is a relatively rare accommodation for three people traveling together, again with a washbasin and private toilet, again on one side of the car. Even rarer are larger rooms accommodating four or more; generally the needs of large parties were better served with multiple rooms, with or without the ability to combine them into a suite. Modern Amtrak Accommodations Amtrak's Superliner Economy Bedrooms (now called Superliner Roomettes, although they are structurally closer to open sections) accommodate two passengers in facing seats that fold out into a lower berth, with an upper berth that folds down from above, a small closet, and no in-room washbasin or toilet, on both sides of both the upper and lower levels of the car. Effectively, they are open sections with walls, a door, and a built-in access ladder for the upper berth (which doubles as a nightstand for the lower berth passenger). Superliner Deluxe Bedrooms are essentially the same as historic Compartments and Double Bedrooms, with the toilet cubicle doubling as a private shower cubicle. In addition, each Superliner sleeping car has two special lower-level accommodations, each taking up the full width of the car: the Accessible Bedroom, at the restroom/shower end of the car (below the Deluxe Bedrooms), is a fully wheelchair-accessible accommodation for two, with a roll-in cubicle for the toilet and shower; the Family Bedroom, at the Economy Bedroom end of the car, accommodates two adults and up to three small children, without private toilet or shower facilities. ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #4530 **********************************************