From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #3759 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Tuesday, March 17 2020 Volume 14 : Number 3759 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Effective product which we've been waiting for, which allows you to relieve your back pain naturally. ["Bac] Your Body's Natural Thinning Enzyme! ["Cheat Your Way Trim!" Subject: Effective product which we've been waiting for, which allows you to relieve your back pain naturally. Effective product which we've been waiting for, which allows you to relieve your back pain naturally. http://carbackk.pro/Rf7idDWJ-TWlbxBsorey18K6c87QqHFs4HOXOxTv20X3Wq8 http://carbackk.pro/tsMiYmTaFhrVQQnBqT9Y7FDuODVE5ICih16PGgBYEr3qM2pG rector George E. Roberts wrote to Saint-Gaudens on May 25, 1907: "It is now settled ... the design for the Eagle shall be the feather head of Liberty with the standing eagle". Saint-Gaudens and his assistants moved quickly on the revision, and he sent models of the new coin on June 1 with a letter stating that the relief of the new models should be coinable by the Mint. The double eagles were then being delayed because Saint-Gaudens had twice sent the Mint models with too high a relief that could not be struck in one blow, as required for circulating coinage. His letter was forwarded to the Philadelphia Mint, where Superintendent John Landis had Mint Chief Engraver Charles E. Barber read and initial it. On June 7, Barber responded to Landis: I beg to report that I have received two models in plaster and also a copy of a letter from Mr. Saint-Gaudens to the Director, in which there are certain statements that are somewhat misleading ... the relief of the design must conform to the fixed conditions and therefore, the only relief that I knew of was coin relief; the models now sent are not coin relief. ... The date of the year is in Roman notation, there is no provision made for even next year, there being no place left, and as these coins have to stand for twenty-five years before another change can be made, I feel it necessary to state that within a few years it would be impossible to date the dies. A metal model for the double eagle by Saint-Gaudens; the design was adapted for the eagle Roberts wrote to Saint-Gaudens on June 11 suggesting that there might be problems with the date and the relief; he received no response and wrote again on June 18. This time the sculptor responded, writing that he had been awaiting the return of his assistant Henry Hering, who had handled much of the dealings with the Mint. He agreed that Roman numerals were ill-advised for the eagle, and he sent new models to the Mint on June 24. Barber used these models to prepare a die, along with a bronze casting which was produced privately, and the Mint struck experimental pieces on July 19. These "high relief" pieces required multiple strikes of the press to fully bring up the design. Saint-Gaudens wrote to the Mint in mid-July, "I am waiting to know about this in order to proceed with the other reliefs", and he was sent one of the new pieces, along with a Liberty Head eagle for comparison. On July 19, Roberts sent a similar pair of coins to Secretary of the Treasury George Cortelyou, noting that Saint-Gaudens used a smooth finish to the design rather than the sharp die work characteristic of the Liberty gold pieces, and he suggested that this might encourage counterfeiting. Roberts communicated these concerns to Saint-Gaudens, w ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:57:08 -0400 From: "Cheat Your Way Trim!" Subject: Your Body's Natural Thinning Enzyme! Your Body's Natural Thinning Enzyme! http://mensfat.guru/z_CANCzZS-izq8yMOxNgyf8SELYiz_PrjVQHL3cnZ1KQknc http://mensfat.guru/f4RpnrBpD_GLrVugNxbv2qjAZdKBGPunVZzTnvFLgbkwWnM According to political analyst James Fallows in The Atlantic (based on a "note from someone with many decades' experience in national politics"), bipartisanship is a phenomenon belonging to a two-party system such as the political system of the United States and does not apply to a parliamentary system (such as Great Britain) since the minority party is not involved in helping write legislation or voting for it. Fallows argues that in a two-party system, the minority party can be obstructionist and thwart the actions of the majority party. However, analyst Anne Applebaum in The Washington Post suggested that partisanship had been rampant in the United Kingdom and described it as "a country in which the government and the opposition glower at each other from opposite sides of the House of Commons, in which backbenchers jeer when their opponents speak." Applebaum suggested there was bipartisanship in Britain, meaning a coalition in 2010 between the opposing major parties but that it remained to be seen whether the coalition could stay together to solve serious problems such as tackling Britain's financial crisis. Bipartisanship (in the context of a two-party system) is the opposite of partisanship which is characterized by a lack of cooperation between rival political parties. James Madison argued in The Federalist Papers that a danger to democracies were factions, which he defined as a group that pushed its interests to the detriment of the national interest. While the framers of the Constitution did not think that political parties would play a role in American politics, political parties have long been a major force in politics worldwide, and several first-world countries have alternated between periods of intense party rivalry and partisanship, as well as periods of bipartisanship. According to Robert Siegel of National Public Radio, there was virtually no cooperation between Democrats and Republicans in the U.S. during the few years before 2010. Bipartisanship can also be between two or more opposite groups (e.g. liberal and conservative) to agree and determine a plan of action on an urgent matter that is of great importance to voters. This interpretation brings bipartisanship closer to the more applied notion of postpartisan decision-making; a solution-focused approach that creates a governance model with third-party arbiters used to detect bias. It is also argued that bipartisanship exists in policy-making that does not have bipartisan support. This is the case if it involves bipartisan exchanges. This element is a central feature in the legislative process and is a bipartisan concept in the sense that it serves as a mechanism for achieving consensus and cooperation ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 08:10:56 -0700 (PDT) From: "reham.91.nomeer" Subject: =?UTF-8?B?2LTZh9in2K/YqSA6INmF2K/ZitixINmF2YjYp9ix2K8g?= =?UTF-8?B?2KjYtNix2YrYqSDZhdi52KrZhdivICgo2KfZhNmC2KfZhw==?= =?UTF-8?B?2LHYqdiMINiq2YjZhtiz2Iwg2KfYs9i32YbYqNmI2YQgKA==?= =?UTF-8?B?2KjYp9mE2KrZiNin2LLZiikpIDE0INin2YTZiSAy?= =?UTF-8?B?NSDZitmI2YbZitipIDIwMjAg2YUg2YTZhdiy2Yo=?= =?UTF-8?B?2K8g2YXZhiDYp9mE2KrZiNin2LXZhCDYrNmI2KfZhCAv?= =?UTF-8?B?INmI2KfYqtizOiAwMDIwMTA2NDkzMDgzMCAtIDAwMjAxMDA2MDAwNjkx?= IAoKKtin2YTYr9in2LEg2KfZhNi52LHYqNmK2Kkg2YTZhNiq2YbZhdmK2Kkg2KfZhNin2K/Yp9ix 2YrYqSoKCirZiNit2K/YqSDYp9mE2LTZh9in2K/Yp9iqINin2YTZhdiq2K7Ytdi12YcqCgoq2LTZ h9in2K/YqToqKiDZhdiv2YrYsSDZhdmI2KfYsdivINio2LTYsdmK2Kkg2YXYudiq2YXYryoKCioo IENIUk0gKSoKCirZiNin2YTZhdmF2YbZiNitINmF2YYg2KzYp9mF2LnYqSDZhdmK2LLZiNix2Yog 4oCTINin2YTZiNmE2KfZitin2Kog2KfZhNmF2KrYrdiv2Kkg2KfZhNij2YXYsdmK2YPZitipKgoK KtmF2YPYp9mGINin2YTYp9mG2LnZgtin2K86ICoq2KfZhNmC2KfZh9ix2Kkg4oCT2KXYs9i32YbY qNmI2YQgLSDYqtmI2YbYsyAqICrYrtmE2KfZhCDYp9mE2YHYqtix2Kkg2YXZhiAxNCDYp9mE2Ykg MjUgKirZitmI2YbZitmIIAoyMDIwKiog2YUqCgoq2YXZgtiv2YXYqSoKCtmF2K/ZitixINil2K/Y p9ix2Kkg2KfZhNmF2YjYp9ix2K8g2KfZhNio2LTYsdmK2Kkg2YHZiiDYo9mKINi02LHZg9ipINmH 2Ygg2LnZhti12LEg2YfYp9mFINmF2YYg2LnZhtin2LXYsSDZhtis2KfYrSDYp9mE2YXYpNiz2LPY qSDYjCAK2YjYsNmE2YMg2LnYqNixINin2YTYpdiv2KfYsdipINin2YTZgdi52KfZhNipINmE2YLY s9mFINin2YTZhdmI2KfYsdivINin2YTYqNi02LHZitipINio2KfZhNi02LHZg9ipINiMINmI2KfZ hNi52YXZhCDYudmE2Yog2KXYrtiq2YrYp9ixIArYp9mE2YXZiNi42YHZitmGINio2KfZhNi02YPZ hCDYp9mE2YXYq9in2YTZiiDYp9mE2LDZiiDZitiq2YXYp9i02Yog2YXYuSDYt9io2YrYudipINin 2YTZhdik2LPYs9ipIC4KCtmE2LDZhNmDINmF2K/Ysdin2KEg2KfZhNmF2YjYp9ix2K8g2KfZhNio 2LTYsdmK2Kkg2YHZiiDYp9mE2LTYsdmD2Kkg2YrYrNioINi52YTZitmH2YUg2KfZhNiu2LbZiNi5 INmE2YTYqtiv2LHZitioINin2YTYrNmK2K8g2YjYudmE2YrZh9mFIArYpdmD2KrYs9in2Kgg2KfZ hNiu2KjYsdin2Kog2KfZhNi52YTZhdmK2Kkg2YjYp9mE2KfZg9in2K/ZitmF2YrYqSDZhNmK2YPZ iNmG2Ygg2KPYtdit2KfYqCDYrtio2LHYqSDZgdmKINil2K/Yp9ix2Kkg2LTYpNmI2YYg2KfZhNmF 2YjYuNmB2YrZhi4KCtin2YTYqtiv2LHZitioINin2YTYrNmK2K8g2YjZhNmE2KfYrNin2KjYqSDY udmE2Yog2YPZhCDYp9mE2KrYs9in2KTZhNin2Kog2K3ZiNmEINil2K/Yp9ix2Kkg2KfZhNmF2YjY p9ix2K8g2KfZhNio2LTYsdmK2Kkg2YfZiCAK2KfZhNmF2YHYqtin2K0g2KfZhNix2KbZitiz2Yog 2YTYqti12KjYrSDZhdiv2YrYsSDYpdiv2KfYsdipINmF2YjYp9ix2K8g2KjYtNix2YrYqSDZiNi0 2KTZiNmGINmF2YjYuNmB2YrZhiDZhtin2KzYrSDYjCDZiNmE2YPZhiDYqNiv2KfZitipIArYudmE 2YrZhtinINin2YTYqti52LHZgSDYudmE2Yog2YXZgdmH2YjZhSDigJzYpdiv2KfYsdipINin2YTZ hdmI2KfYsdivINin2YTYqNi02LHZitip4oCdINiMINmI2YXYpyDZh9mKINij2YfYr9in2YEg2KXY r9in2LHYqSDYp9mE2YXZiNin2LHYryAK2KfZhNio2LTYsdmK2Kkg2J8g2Iwg2YjZhdinINmH2Yog 2KfZhNi52YbYp9i12LEg2KfZhNmB2LnYp9mE2Kkg2YHZiiDYp9mE2KXYr9in2LHYqSDZhNmE2YXZ iNin2LHYryDYp9mE2KjYtNix2YrYqQoKKtij2YfYr9in2YEg2KXYr9in2LHYqSDYp9mE2YXZiNin 2LHYryDYp9mE2KjYtNix2YrYqSoKCtiq2KrZhNiu2LUg2KPZh9iv2KfZgSDYpdiv2KfYsdipINin 2YTZhdmI2KfYsdivINin2YTYqNi02LHZitipINmB2Yog2KPYsdio2LnYqSDYo9mH2K/Yp9mBINix 2KbZitiz2YrYqSDZh9mKIDoKCtij2YfYr9in2YEg2KfYrNiq2YXYp9i52YrYqTog2KrZgtmI2YUg 2KjYqti02LrZitmEINij2YHYsdin2K8g2KfZhNmF2KzYqtmF2Lkg2KjZhdinINmK2YbYp9iz2Kgg 2YLYr9ix2KfYqtmH2YUg2YjZg9mB2KbYp9iq2YfZhS4KCtij2YfYr9in2YEg2YjYuNmK2YHZitip OiDYrdmK2Ksg2KrZgtmI2YUg2KjYp9mE2KfZh9iq2YXYp9mFINio2KrYr9mB2YIg2KfZhNmC2YjZ iSDYp9mE2KjYtNix2YrYqSDZhNmE2YXZhti02KPYqdiMINmI2KfZhNi52YXZhCDYudmE2YkgCtin 2YTYp9iz2KrZgdin2K/YqSDZhdmG2YfYpyDYqNi02YPZhCDZg9in2YXZhC4KCtij2YfYr9in2YEg 2KrZhti42YrZhdmK2Kk6INmI2LDZhNmDINmF2YYg2K7ZhNin2YQg2YjYrNmI2K8g2K3ZhNmC2Kkg 2LHYqNi3INio2YrZhiDYpdiv2KfYsdipINin2YTZhdmI2KfYsdivINin2YTYqNi02LHZitipIArZ iNin2YTYo9mC2LPYp9mFINin2YTYo9iu2LHZiSDYp9mE2YXZiNis2YjYr9ipINmB2Yog2KfZhNmF 2YbYtNij2KkuCgrYo9mH2K/Yp9mBINil2YbYs9in2YbZitipOiDYqtiz2LnZiSDZhNiq2YjZgdmK 2LEg2YXYqti32YTYqNin2Kog2KfZhNi52KfZhdmE2YrZhiDZiNin2YTYp9mH2KrZhdin2YUg2KjY rdin2KzYp9iq2YfZhQoKIAoKKtmF2LPYqtmH2K/ZgdmK2YYg2YHZiiDYsNmE2YM6KgoK2YXYr9ix 2KfYoSDZiNix2KTYs9in2KEg2KPZgtiz2KfZhSDYp9mE2YXZiNin2LHYryDYp9mE2KjYtNix2YrY qdiM2KfZhNmF2LPYpNmI2YTZiNmGINmI2KfZhNmF2YjYuNmB2YjZhiDYp9mE2LnYp9mF2YTZiNmG INmB2Yog2YXYrNin2YQgCtin2YTZhdmI2KfYsdivINin2YTYqNi02LHZitipINmI2KfZhNiw2YrZ hiDZitix2LrYqNmI2YYg2YHZiiDYqti32YjZitixINmF2LnYp9ix2YHZh9mFINmI2KrYrdiz2YrZ hiDZhdmH2KfYsdin2KrZh9mFINin2YTZhdiq2LnZhNmC2KkgCtio2KXYr9in2LHYqSDYp9mE2YXZ iNin2LHYryDYp9mE2KjYtNix2YrYqS4KCirZhNmE2KrYs9is2YrZhCAqKtin2LbYuti3INmH2YbY pyogCjxodHRwczovL2RvY3MuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS9mb3Jtcy9kL2UvMUZBSXBRTFNmTHBHSWZTemw5 RnpVdjVqX2d2bnBRUWs4b3BoaDFscUl4TnFMODdjOUtvajF6R2cvdmlld2Zvcm0+CgogCgrZhdin 2KzYs9iq2YrYsSAg2YrYudmC2K8g2KjZhtmB2LMg2KfZhNmF2YjYudivCgogCgrYp9mE2LHZgtmF CgrYtNmH2KfYr9ipCgrYqtin2LHZitiuINin2YTYp9mG2LnZgtin2K8KCtmF2YPYp9mGINin2YTY p9mG2LnZgtin2K8KCjEKCmNlcnRpZmllZCBtYXJrZXRpbmcgbWFuYWdlcgoK2YXYr9mK2LEg2KrY s9mI2YrZgiDZhdi52KrZhdivCgrZhdmGIDMxINmF2KfZitmIINin2YTZiiAxMSDZitmI2YbZitip CgrYp9mE2YLYp9mH2LHYqSDigJMg2KXYs9i32YbYqNmI2YQg4oCTINiq2YjZhtizCgoyCgpDZXJ0 aWZpZWQgRmluYW5jaWFsIE1hbmFnZXIgKGNmbSkKCtmF2K/ZitixINmF2KfZhNmKINmF2LnYqtmF 2K8KCtmF2YYgNyDYp9mE2YogMTgg2YrZiNmG2YrYqQoK2KfZhNmC2KfZh9ix2Kkg4oCTINil2LPY t9mG2KjZiNmEIOKAkyDYqtmI2YbYswoKMwoKY2VydGlmaWVkIGNvbnRyYWN0cyBtYW5hZ2VyCgrZ hdiv2YrYsSDYp9iv2KfYsdipINin2YTYudmC2YjYryDYp9mE2YXYudiq2YXYrwoK2YXZhiAxNCDY p9mE2YogMjUg2YrZiNmG2YrYqQoK2KfZhNmC2KfZh9ix2Kkg4oCTINil2LPYt9mG2KjZiNmEIOKA kyDYqtmI2YbYswoKNAoKY2VydGlmaWVkIEh1bWFuIHJlc291cmNlIG1hbmFnZXIKCtmF2K/Zitix INmF2YjYp9ix2K8g2KjYtNix2YrYqSDZhdi52KrZhdivCgrZhdmGIDE0INin2YTZiiAyNSDZitmI 2YbZitipCgrYp9mE2YLYp9mH2LHYqSDigJMg2KXYs9i32YbYqNmI2YQg4oCTINiq2YjZhtizCgoq 2YTZhdiy2YrYryDZhdmGINin2YTZhdi52YTZiNmF2KfYqiDZitmF2YPZhtmD2YUg2KfZhNiq2YjY p9i12YQg2YXYuSoKCirZhdiv2YrYsSDYp9mE2KrYr9ix2YrYqCoKCirYoyAvINix2YrZh9in2YYg 2LPYp9mE2YUqCgoq2KzZiNin2YQgOiAwMDIwMTA2NDkzMDgzMCAtIDAwMjAxMDA2MDAwNjkxKgoK KtmH2KfYqtmBIDAwMjAyMzc4MDA1ODMgLSAwMDIwMjM3ODAwNjkzKgoKKtmB2KfZg9izIDAwMjAy Mzc4MDA1NzMqKiDigJMgMDAyMDIzNTg2NjMyMyoKDQotLSAK4oCP2YTZgtivINiq2YTZgtmK2Kog 2YfYsNmHINin2YTYsdiz2KfZhNipINmE2KPZhtmDINmF2LTYqtix2YMg2YHZiiDYp9mE2YXYrNmF 2YjYudipICJhaGFkaHJvcmcyMiIg2YXZhiDZhdis2YXZiNi52KfYqiBHb29nbGUuCtmE2KXZhNi6 2KfYoSDYp9mE2KfYtNiq2LHYp9mDINmB2Yog2YfYsNmHINin2YTZhdis2YXZiNi52Kkg2YjYpdmK 2YLYp9mBINiq2YTZgtmKINix2LPYp9im2YQg2KfZhNil2YTZg9iq2LHZiNmG2YrYqSDZhdmG2YfY p9iMINij2LHYs9mEINix2LPYp9mE2Kkg2KXZhNmD2KrYsdmI2YbZitipINil2YTZiSBhaGFkaHJv cmcyMit1bnN1YnNjcmliZUBnb29nbGVncm91cHMuY29tLgrZhNi52LHYtiDZh9iw2Ycg2KfZhNmF 2YbYp9mC2LTYqSDYudmE2Ykg2KfZhNmI2YrYqNiMINin2YbYqtmC2YQg2KXZhNmJIGh0dHBzOi8v Z3JvdXBzLmdvb2dsZS5jb20vZC9tc2dpZC9haGFkaHJvcmcyMi84NmFlMjM3YS1mNDNhLTRmOWIt OGNhZS0wNjRlMjY4ZjVhNjIlNDBnb29nbGVncm91cHMuY29tLgo= ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 07:17:29 -0400 From: "Car Insurance Info" Subject: Affordable and Convenient Car Insurance Affordable and Convenient Car Insurance http://carbackk.pro/-YRQWAwjugJCT73R0fyFF7FsOeZ17IRp0y9EVX0Lgx6CLg http://carbackk.pro/E2cq6wVGYZpCZalMZOD8KdjlaO1nvHIatQK81dTElMbbHQ The Indian Head eagle was a $10 gold piece or eagle struck by the United States Mint continuously from 1907 until 1916, and then irregularly until 1933. The obverse and reverse were designed by sculptor Augustus Saint-Gaudens, originally commissioned for use on other denominations. He was suffering from cancer and did not survive to see the coins released. Beginning in 1904, President Theodore Roosevelt proposed new, more artistic designs on US coins, prompting the Mint to hire Saint-Gaudens to create them. Roosevelt and Saint-Gaudens at first considered a uniform design for the four denominations of coins which were struck in gold, but in 1907 Roosevelt decided to use a model for the obverse of the eagle that the sculptor had meant to use for the cent. For the reverse of the $10 coin, the President decided on a design featuring a standing bald eagle that had been developed for the Saint-Gaudens double eagle $20 coin, while the obverse features a left-facing bust of Liberty wearing an Indian feather headdress. The coin as sculpted by Saint-Gaudens was too high in relief for the Mint to strike readily, and it took months to modify the design so that the coin could be struck by one blow of the Mint's presses. Saint-Gaudens died on August 3, 1907, and Roosevelt insisted that the new eagle be finished and struck that month. New pieces were given to the President on August 31 which differ from the coins struck later for circulation. The omission of the motto "In God We Trust" on the new coins caused public outrage, and prompted Congress to pass a bill mandating its inclusion. Mint Chief Engraver Charles E. Barber added the words and made minor modifications to the design. The Indian Head eagle was struck regularly until 1916, and then intermittently until President Franklin Roosevelt directed the Mint to stop producing gold coins in 1933. Its termination ended the series of eagles struck for circulation begun in 1795. Many Indian Head eagles were melted by the government in the late 1930s; the 1933 issue is a particular rarity, as few were distributed. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:14:02 -0400 From: "Eat The Fat Off" Subject: Harvard Researcher Says: "We Finally Know Why These Islanders Eat More Fatty Food Than Americans. Harvard Researcher Says: "We Finally Know Why These Islanders Eat More Fatty Food Than Americans. http://mensfat.guru/WFqwQdRbjwp8tyZjgGR5QNdpFdEZFMLkY_tVRNan5WVgdGo http://mensfat.guru/wzrnk2awj6qbINRBNk8tSYIAjMJSLJp0acDoHk80Zdz7NzA According to political analyst James Fallows in The Atlantic (based on a "note from someone with many decades' experience in national politics"), bipartisanship is a phenomenon belonging to a two-party system such as the political system of the United States and does not apply to a parliamentary system (such as Great Britain) since the minority party is not involved in helping write legislation or voting for it. Fallows argues that in a two-party system, the minority party can be obstructionist and thwart the actions of the majority party. However, analyst Anne Applebaum in The Washington Post suggested that partisanship had been rampant in the United Kingdom and described it as "a country in which the government and the opposition glower at each other from opposite sides of the House of Commons, in which backbenchers jeer when their opponents speak." Applebaum suggested there was bipartisanship in Britain, meaning a coalition in 2010 between the opposing major parties but that it remained to be seen whether the coalition could stay together to solve serious problems such as tackling Britain's financial crisis. Bipartisanship (in the context of a two-party system) is the opposite of partisanship which is characterized by a lack of cooperation between rival political parties. James Madison argued in The Federalist Papers that a danger to democracies were factions, which he defined as a group that pushed its interests to the detriment of the national interest. While the framers of the Constitution did not think that political parties would play a role in American politics, political parties have long been a major force in politics worldwide, and several first-world countries have alternated between periods of intense party rivalry and partisanship, as well as periods of bipartisanship. According to Robert Siegel of National Public Radio, there was virtually no cooperation between Democrats and Republicans in the U.S. during the few years before 2010. Bipartisanship can also be between two or more opposite groups (e.g. liberal and conservative) to agree and determine a plan of action on an urgent matter that is of great importance to voters. This interpretation brings bipartisanship closer to the more applied notion of postpartisan decision-making; a solution-focused approach that creates a governance model with third-party arbiters used to detect bias. It is also argued that bipartisanship exists in policy-making that does not have bipartisan support. This is the case if it involves bipartisan exchanges. This element is a central feature in the legislative process and is a bipartisan concept in the sense that it serves as a mechanism for achieving consensus and cooperation ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 07:03:05 -0400 From: "Liberty Mutual" Subject: You wonât believe how much you could save with this little switch. You wonbt believe how much you could save with this little switch. http://libertyinsure.pro/_KcVJvWR_hwrIxk1zAWhsyIvsdGWvIM_SVwzWHBS3tR-kylC http://libertyinsure.pro/PfW4n2nHEIi9VfadKZ_wW7gfWA3mTSdp7GTS5AWha1TIiRhR In 1904, President Theodore Roosevelt wrote to Secretary of the Treasury Leslie Mortier Shaw complaining that U.S. coinage lacked artistic merit. He suggested that the treasury engage a private artist to prepare new coin designs, such as sculptor Augustus Saint-Gaudens. At Roosevelt's direction, the Mint hired Saint-Gaudens to redesign the cent and the four gold pieces: the double eagle ($20), eagle ($10), half eagle ($5), and quarter eagle ($2.50). The Liberty Head design had been first struck for the eagle in 1838; the last addition to the Liberty Head gold series was the double eagle, first struck for circulation in 1850. The designs of those pieces had remained unchanged for more than 25 years, and they could be changed without an act of Congress. In 1905, Mint Engraver Charles E. Barber engraved the obverse of Roosevelt's inauguration medal, while his assistant George T. Morgan engraved the reverse. Roosevelt disliked the work and engaged Saint-Gaudens to design an unofficial medal commemorating the inauguration. Saint-Gaudens foresaw resistance from Barber on the question of the new coinage; he wrote to his brother Louis, "Barber is a S.O.A.B. [son of a bitch] but I had a talk with the President who ordered Secretary Shaw in my presence to cut Barber's head off if he didn't do our bidding". Saint-Gaudens's 1905 inaugural medal reverse contains a standing eagle similar to the one on the $10 piece. Roosevelt was impressed by some models that Saint-Gaudens had prepared for the cent showing a head of Liberty. In early 1907, he wrote to Saint-Gaudens proposing that an Indian war bonnet be added to the obverse of the cent: "I feel very strongly that on at least one coin we ought to have the Indian feather headdress. It is distinctly American, and very picturesque. Couldn't you have just such a head as you have now, but with the feather headdress?" Numismatic historian Walter Breen describes this as "the absurd addition of a feathered warbonnet", and art historian Cornelius Vermeule states that the Indian Head eagle "missed being a great coin because Roosevelt interfered" with its design. Nonetheless, Saint-Gaudens added the headdress to the head of Liberty in February 1907. He was undecided about which design to use for the gold pieces, which were still intended to have a uniform appearance, and he proposed using the headdress Liberty for the double eagle. Roosevelt tentatively decided to use different designs on the eagle and double eagle, with the eagle to bear the headdress Liberty. The double eagle would show a Liberty striding forward, with a flying eagle on the reverse. The President was prepared ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:29:47 -0400 From: "TedsWoodworking" Subject: It's like having a MASTER woodworker a It's like having a MASTER woodworker http://drainwood.bid/_XGlqUZ_esQbf-TJv36xyCK4mIHI4J3MZm5QzVHHjQ0SLDw http://drainwood.bid/htzqA211OUrMW6enXTkQ4a_nEfkeFJG_SaGiPHryP_BrH2Q A site may be added to the List of World Heritage in Danger if there are conditions that threaten the characteristics for which the landmark or area was inscribed on the World Heritage List. Such problems may involve armed conflict and war, natural disasters, pollution, poaching, or uncontrolled urbanization or human development. This danger list is intended to increase international awareness of the threats and to encourage counteractive measures. Threats to a site can be either proven imminent threats or potential dangers that could have adverse effects on a site. The state of conservation for each site on the danger list is reviewed on a yearly basis, after which the committee may request additional measures, delete the property from the list if the threats have ceased or consider deletion from both the List of World Heritage in Danger and the World Heritage List. Only two sites have ever been delisted: the Arabian Oryx Sanctuary in Oman and the Dresden Elbe Valley in Germany. The Arabian Oryx Sanctuary was directly delisted in 2007, instead of first being put on the danger list, after the Omani government decided to reduce the protected area's size by 90 percent. The Dresden Elbe Valley was first placed on the danger list in 2006 when the World Heritage Committee decided that plans to construct the WaldschlC6sschen Bridge would significantly alter the valley's landscape. In response, Dresden City Council attempted to stop the bridge's construction, but after several court decisions allowed the building of the bridge to proceed, the valley was removed from the World Heritage List in 2009. The first global assessment to quantitatively measure threats to Natural World Heritage sites found that 63 percent of sites have been damaged by increasing human pressures including encroaching roads, agriculture infrastructure and settlements over the last two decades. These activities endanger Natural World Heritage sites and could compromise their unique values. Of the Natural World Heritage sites that contain forest, 91 percent of those experienced some loss since the year 2000. Many Natural World Heritage sites are more threatened than previously thought and require immediate conservation action ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:55:25 -0400 From: "Instahard Partner" Subject: Rediscover Your Physical Stamina with Instahard Rediscover Your Physical Stamina with Instahard http://mensfat.guru/tC7bHRXF1UWGhd7dr3LGUT0TGKfJFRKX50c4SPzpkRAcgwBq http://mensfat.guru/Is7VVjcIAcjWwmI11hma5AaryXKtKUABRu3h0KgHplUoiU3c Tuvalu (/tu??v??lu?/ too-VAH-loo) (formerly known as the Ellice Islands), is a country in Polynesia, located in the Pacific Ocean, situated in Oceania and about midway between Hawaii and Australia. The island country lies east-northeast of the Santa Cruz Islands (which belong to the Solomon Islands), southeast of Nauru, south of Kiribati, west of Tokelau, northwest of Samoa and Wallis and Futuna, and north of Fiji. It is composed of three reef islands and six true atolls spread out between the latitude of 5B0 to 10B0 south and longitude of 176B0 to 180B0, west of the International Date Line. Tuvalu has a population of 11,192 (2017 census). The total land area of the islands of Tuvalu is 26 square kilometres (10 sq mi). The first inhabitants of Tuvalu were Polynesians. The origins of the people of Tuvalu are addressed in the theories regarding migration into the Pacific that began about three thousand years ago. During pre-European-contact times there was frequent canoe voyaging between the islands as Polynesian navigation skills are recognised to have allowed deliberate journeys on double-hull sailing canoes or outrigger canoes. The pattern of settlement that is believed to have occurred is that the Polynesians spread out from Samoa and Tonga into the Tuvaluan atolls, with Tuvalu providing a stepping stone to further migration into the Polynesian outliers in Melanesia and Micronesia. In 1568, Spanish navigator Clvaro de MendaC1a was the first European to sail through the archipelago, sighting the island of Nui during his expedition in search of Terra Australis. The island of Funafuti was named Ellice's Island in 1819; the name Ellice was applied to all of the nine islands after the work of English hydrographer Alexander George Findlay. The Ellice Islands came into Great Britain's sphere of influence in the late 19th century, as the result of a treaty between Great Britain and Germany relating to the demarcation of the spheres of influence in the Pacific Ocean. Each of the Ellice Islands was declared a British Protectorate by Captain Gibson of HMS Curacoa between 9 and 16 October 1892. The Ellice Islands were administered as a British protectorate by a Resident Commissioner from 1892 to 1916, as part of the British Western Pacific Territories (BWPT), and then as part of the Gilbert and Ellice Islands colony from 1916 to 1976. A referendum was held in December 1974 to determine whether the Gilbert Islands and Ellice Islands should each have their own administration. As a consequence of the referendum, the Gilbert and Ellice Islands colony ceased to exist on 1 January 1976, and the separate British colonies of Kiribati and Tuvalu came into existence. Tuvalu became fully independent as a sovereign state within the Commonwealth on 1 October 1978. On 5 September 2000, Tuvalu became the 189th member of the United Nations ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #3759 **********************************************