From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #2014 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Friday, October 14 2016 Volume 14 : Number 2014 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Simple Trick Will Prevent Your Food From Spoiling ["Food Huggers" Subject: Simple Trick Will Prevent Your Food From Spoiling Simple Trick Will Prevent Your Food From Spoiling http://btrhellth.net/irSoS2GnT8YGWLqfwC0k9b_PSfbDO4TPn0yPfKh8NhCkyQc Want To Save More Money On Groceries? Clever Invention Keeps Fruit & Veggies Fresher Longer This Simple Trick Will Prevent Your Food From Spoiling http://btrhellth.net/irSoS2GnT8YGWLqfwC0k9b_PSfbDO4TPn0yPfKh8NhCkyQc Never Throw Out Half An Avocado Again Using THIS! How To Keep Your Fruit & Veggies Fresher Longer Hate When Your Fruits & Veggies Spoil? The Clever Invention You Have To See To Believe! http://btrhellth.net/irSoS2GnT8YGWLqfwC0k9b_PSfbDO4TPn0yPfKh8NhCkyQc to re-move http://btrhellth.net/FH5_eZNx2Ndaz10PYTjTs6im48dQvZmtLMbtIvXWd9V4dlw ------------------------------ Date: 13 Oct 2016 17:31:44 -0500 From: =?ISO-8859-15?B?RGlldGEgZGUgTWVkaW8gRO1h?= Subject: =?ISO-8859-15?B?QXRlbmNp824sIEhvbWJyZXMgeSBNdWplcmVzIFF1ZSBObyB QdWVkZW4gUGVyZGVyIE5pIDIgS2cuLi4=?= Obliga A Tu Cuerpo A Quemar Grasa Como Si Estuvieras En Una Dieta Baja En Carbohidratos... !Pero Comiendo Sabrosos Carbohidratos A DIARIO! Esta Nueva Estrategia Ingeniosa Quema Tu Grasa Corporal Durante Todo El Dma Aunque Sslo 'Haras Dieta' Por MEDIO Dma Te invito a conocer mi sistema visitando mi Pagina Web >>> Clic Aqui Saludos Lcda. Karla Cobeqa La Dieta de Medio Dma Click aqui para su Desuscripcisn ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 16:47:53 +0200 From: "Black Out USA" Subject: Exposed: American Defeat In WW3 Now Certain... Exposed: American Defeat In WW3 Now Certain... http://srvivloffr.net/mkYQ51yCmsOv-xI_1NNuWzfwWeCfIyppKXvqz3RXkNRZ60Q Exposed: American Defeat In WW3 Now Certain... to re-move http://srvivloffr.net/l1mSEyAUiZmkDPYRM_8hxFwwyOpz9B953_m6mluGazEdkig The formal study of semantics intersects with many other fields of inquiry, including lexicology, syntax, pragmatics, etymology and others. Independently, semantics is also a well-defined field in its own right, often with synthetic properties. In the philosophy of language, semantics and reference are closely connected. Further related fields include philology, communication, and semiotics. The formal study of semantics can therefore be manifold and complex.Semantics contrasts with syntax, the study of the combinatorics of units of a language (without reference to their meaning), and pragmatics, the study of the relationships between the symbols of a language, their meaning, and the users of the language. Semantics as a field of study also has significant ties to various representational theories of meaning including truth theories of meaning, coherence theories of meaning, and correspondence theories of meaning. Each of these is related to the general philosophical study of reality and the representation of meaning.In Chomskyan linguistics there was no mechanism for the learning of semantic relations, and the nativist view considered all semantic notions as inborn. Thus, even novel concepts were proposed to have been dormant in some sense. This view was also thought unable to address many issues such as metaphor or associative meanings, and semantic change, where meanings within a linguistic community change over time, and qualia or subjective experience. Another issue not addressed by the nativist model was how perceptual cues are combined in thought, e.g. in mental rotation.This view of semantics, as an innate finite meaning inherent in a lexical unit that can be composed to generate meanings for larger chunks of discourse, is now being fiercely debated in the emerging domain of cognitive linguistics and also in the non-Fodorian camp in philosophy of language. The challenge is motivated byIn linguistics, a homonym is one of a group of words that share the same pronunciation but have different meaning! s, wheth er spelled the same or not. A more restrictive definition sees homonyms as words that are simultaneously homographs (words that share the same spelling, regardless of their pronunciation) and homophones (words that share the same pronunciation, regardless of their spelling) b that is to say they have same pronunciation and spelling, but different meanings. The relationship between a set of homonyms is called homonymy. Examples of homonyms are the pair stalk (part of a plant) and stalk (follow/harass a person) and the pair left (past tense of leave) and left (opposite of right). A distinction is sometimes made between "true" homonyms, which are unrelated in origin, such as skate (glide on ice) and skate (the fish), and polysemous homonyms, or polysemes, which have a shared origin, such as mouth (of a river) and mouth (of an animal).In non-technical contexts, the term "homonym" may be used (somewhat confusingly) to refer to words that are either homographs or homophones. The words row (propel with oars) and row (argument) and row (a linear arrangement of seating) are considered homographs, while the words read (peruse) and reed (waterside plant) would be considered homophones; under this looser definition, both groups of words represent groups of homonyms.The adjective homonymous can additionally be used wherever two items share the same name, independent of how close they are or aren't related in terms of their meaning or etymologyfactors internal to language, such as the problem of resolving indexical or anaphora (e.g. this x, him, last week). In these situations context serves as the input, but the interpreted utterance also modifies the context, so it is also the output. Thus, the interpretation is necessarily dynamic and the meaning of sentences is viewed as contexts changing potentials instead of propositionsfactors external to language, i.e. language is not a set of labels stuck on things, but "a toolbox, the importance of whose elements lie in the way they function rather than their attachments to! things ." This view reflects the position of the later Wittgenstein and his famous game example, and is related to the positions of Quine, Davidson, and others.A concrete example of the latter phenomenon is semantic underspecification b meanings are not complete without some elements of context. To take an example of one word, red, its meaning in a phrase such as red book is similar to many other usages, and can be viewed as compositional. However, the colours implied in phrases such as red wine (very dark), and red hair (coppery), or red soil, or red skin are very different. Indeed, these colours by themselves would not be called red by native speakers. These instances are contrastive, so red wine is so called only in comparison with the other kind of wine (which also is not white for the same reasons). This view goes back to de Saussure:Each of a set of synonyms like redouter ('to dread'), craindre ('to fear'), avoir peur ('to be afraid') has its particular value only because they stand in contrast with one another. No word has a value that can be identified independently of what else is in its vicinity.and may go back to earlier Indian views on language, especially the Nyaya view of words as indicators and not carriers of meaning.An attempt to defend a system based on propositional meaning for semantic underspecification can be found in the generative lexicon model of James Pustejovsky, who extends contextual operations (based on type shifting) into the lexicon. Thus meanings are generated "on the fly" (as you go), based on finite context. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:14:59 +0200 From: "Food Huggers" Subject: Simple Trick Will Prevent Your Food From Spoiling Simple Trick Will Prevent Your Food From Spoiling http://btrhellth.net/QLse9etouPxc1DlFBXL7B9vnzxglGjXOWak1BeRxISWEeLk Want To Save More Money On Groceries? Clever Invention Keeps Fruit & Veggies Fresher Longer This Simple Trick Will Prevent Your Food From Spoiling http://btrhellth.net/QLse9etouPxc1DlFBXL7B9vnzxglGjXOWak1BeRxISWEeLk Never Throw Out Half An Avocado Again Using THIS! How To Keep Your Fruit & Veggies Fresher Longer Hate When Your Fruits & Veggies Spoil? The Clever Invention You Have To See To Believe! http://btrhellth.net/QLse9etouPxc1DlFBXL7B9vnzxglGjXOWak1BeRxISWEeLk to re-move http://btrhellth.net/48Spuo6oOfAEacKyLgrEkhKEAF-WZ0vPcO1JaZ5_cGHfiU4S ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:13:31 +0200 From: "Black Out USA" Subject: Exposed: American Defeat In WW3 Now Certain... Exposed: American Defeat In WW3 Now Certain... http://srvivloffr.net/zjnHM2sj1EUpqqd9piv0UDNlTUHbLkosiYFMddwt84HBnj4 Exposed: American Defeat In WW3 Now Certain... to re-move http://srvivloffr.net/Ak7gUJx_qpn1d4FYMUE1V3veJXXIaB-pqxc2IFZ-59uhiJj- The formal study of semantics intersects with many other fields of inquiry, including lexicology, syntax, pragmatics, etymology and others. Independently, semantics is also a well-defined field in its own right, often with synthetic properties. In the philosophy of language, semantics and reference are closely connected. Further related fields include philology, communication, and semiotics. The formal study of semantics can therefore be manifold and complex.Semantics contrasts with syntax, the study of the combinatorics of units of a language (without reference to their meaning), and pragmatics, the study of the relationships between the symbols of a language, their meaning, and the users of the language. Semantics as a field of study also has significant ties to various representational theories of meaning including truth theories of meaning, coherence theories of meaning, and correspondence theories of meaning. Each of these is related to the general philosophical study of reality and the representation of meaning.In Chomskyan linguistics there was no mechanism for the learning of semantic relations, and the nativist view considered all semantic notions as inborn. Thus, even novel concepts were proposed to have been dormant in some sense. This view was also thought unable to address many issues such as metaphor or associative meanings, and semantic change, where meanings within a linguistic community change over time, and qualia or subjective experience. Another issue not addressed by the nativist model was how perceptual cues are combined in thought, e.g. in mental rotation.This view of semantics, as an innate finite meaning inherent in a lexical unit that can be composed to generate meanings for larger chunks of discourse, is now being fiercely debated in the emerging domain of cognitive linguistics and also in the non-Fodorian camp in philosophy of language. The challenge is motivated byIn linguistics, a homonym is one of a group of words that share the same pronunciation but have different meaning! s, wheth er spelled the same or not. A more restrictive definition sees homonyms as words that are simultaneously homographs (words that share the same spelling, regardless of their pronunciation) and homophones (words that share the same pronunciation, regardless of their spelling) b that is to say they have same pronunciation and spelling, but different meanings. The relationship between a set of homonyms is called homonymy. Examples of homonyms are the pair stalk (part of a plant) and stalk (follow/harass a person) and the pair left (past tense of leave) and left (opposite of right). A distinction is sometimes made between "true" homonyms, which are unrelated in origin, such as skate (glide on ice) and skate (the fish), and polysemous homonyms, or polysemes, which have a shared origin, such as mouth (of a river) and mouth (of an animal).In non-technical contexts, the term "homonym" may be used (somewhat confusingly) to refer to words that are either homographs or homophones. The words row (propel with oars) and row (argument) and row (a linear arrangement of seating) are considered homographs, while the words read (peruse) and reed (waterside plant) would be considered homophones; under this looser definition, both groups of words represent groups of homonyms.The adjective homonymous can additionally be used wherever two items share the same name, independent of how close they are or aren't related in terms of their meaning or etymologyfactors internal to language, such as the problem of resolving indexical or anaphora (e.g. this x, him, last week). In these situations context serves as the input, but the interpreted utterance also modifies the context, so it is also the output. Thus, the interpretation is necessarily dynamic and the meaning of sentences is viewed as contexts changing potentials instead of propositionsfactors external to language, i.e. language is not a set of labels stuck on things, but "a toolbox, the importance of whose elements lie in the way they function rather than their attachments to! things ." This view reflects the position of the later Wittgenstein and his famous game example, and is related to the positions of Quine, Davidson, and others.A concrete example of the latter phenomenon is semantic underspecification b meanings are not complete without some elements of context. To take an example of one word, red, its meaning in a phrase such as red book is similar to many other usages, and can be viewed as compositional. However, the colours implied in phrases such as red wine (very dark), and red hair (coppery), or red soil, or red skin are very different. Indeed, these colours by themselves would not be called red by native speakers. These instances are contrastive, so red wine is so called only in comparison with the other kind of wine (which also is not white for the same reasons). This view goes back to de Saussure:Each of a set of synonyms like redouter ('to dread'), craindre ('to fear'), avoir peur ('to be afraid') has its particular value only because they stand in contrast with one another. No word has a value that can be identified independently of what else is in its vicinity.and may go back to earlier Indian views on language, especially the Nyaya view of words as indicators and not carriers of meaning.An attempt to defend a system based on propositional meaning for semantic underspecification can be found in the generative lexicon model of James Pustejovsky, who extends contextual operations (based on type shifting) into the lexicon. Thus meanings are generated "on the fly" (as you go), based on finite context. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 11:30:33 +0200 From: "Pixotine" Subject: The Original Nicotine Toothpick You Can Take Anywhere The Original Nicotine Toothpick You Can Take Anywhere http://bsttripp.net/0wdNb-CHwQfeP9FVmz_8lJ7jKseuAaaXVlCIwdGPP2RLdhA The Original Nicotine Toothpick You Can Take Anywhere http://bsttripp.net/3pwco8wbvCkEoCJystKWkiUwtKXjRsd5B5TkuOc_tL29YDE ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:04:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Sudan Brand 14 Subject: You have been added to Sudan Brand 14 Hi ammf-digest@smoe.org, sudanbrand14@gmail.com added you to the Sudan Brand 14 group. https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sudanbrand14 Message from sudanbrand14@gmail.com: . About this group: YX/YYYX' X*YX/Y Y X.X/YX'X* YYX9YYYX'X* X9Y X'X3YX'Y X'X3Y X' YX'YX1Y YY X' X(X'YYX3X(X) YYYX3X*X+YX1Y Y X'YX.YY X,Y Y Y X*YYX1 YX9YYYX'X* YYX5YX) X9Y X'YYYX*X,X'X* X'YX5Y YY X) YX*YYYX) X4X-YYX' X-X*Y X'YYYX'YX& X'YX.YY X,Y X) - - X9X1X6 X'YX.X/YX'X* X'YYX7YYX(X) YY X'Y YY X'YX3YX/X'Y - - X*YYY X1 X'YX9YX'YX) X'YX3YX/X'YY X) - - X*YX/Y Y YYX1X) YYX5YX) X9Y X'YYYX*X,X'X* YX'YYYX'X1X/ Y X'YYX1X5 X'YX'X3X*X+YX'X1Y X) X(X'YX3YX/X'Y Google Groups allows you to create and participate in online forums and email-based groups with a rich community experience. You can also use your Group to share documents, pictures, and calendars invitations. If you do not wish to be a member of this group or believe this group may contain spam: * You can unsubscribe from this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sudanbrand14/unsubscribe/AHZ7KVNCbKKQso5g1rloA2YQfKPsM6UHGhjhHARpLLlu_K4iKwO4lTlVkj95AsJHTA0hOjxmRM3yBHfgZjGKPejwuUo5JZNdCA * You can report this group for abuse at https://groups.google.com/d/abuse/YQAAAB7_E8-HAAAAiaZWh20AAAB8I2blh9elMbtUNyiCdjjbGLAFeo0 * You can opt out of all future Google Groups activity at https://groups.google.com/d/optout View this group at: https://groups.google.com/d/forum/sudanbrand14 Start your own group at https://groups.google.com/d/creategroup. Visit Google Groups Help Center at http://support.google.com/groups/bin/answer.py?answer=46601. ------------------------------ Date: 14 Oct 2016 06:56:30 +0800 From: "Gagum Melvin Sikze Kakha" Subject: Re: Great Investment Offer Hello In my search for a business partner i got your contact in google search. My client is willing to invest $10 Million to $500 million but my client said he need a trusted partner who he can have a meeting at the point of releasing his funds. I told my client that you have a good profile with your company which i got details about you on my search on google lookup. Can we trust you. Can we make a plan for a long term business relationship. Please reply. Regards, Gagum Melvin Sikze Kakha Tel: +44 7031975765 ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #2014 **********************************************