From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #16121 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Thursday, May 29 2025 Volume 14 : Number 16121 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Your free neck stretching solution ["Accelerate Your Results" Subject: Your free neck stretching solution Your free neck stretching solution http://slimtea.click/yHEr2ae6D2E2qHLn91mOzhS-XW7oGa_74x_O8ep6WUROKQTY6w http://slimtea.click/2K1ypsaWZRqIf3ZxcxJeTw3-4KtGxieRS55oLJMOV67PnFBCBQ real habitats, most early euornithians lacked perching adaptations and likely included shorebird-like species, waders, and swimming and diving species. The latter included the superficially gull-like Ichthyornis and the Hesperornithiformes, which became so well adapted to hunting fish in marine environments that they lost the ability to fly and became primarily aquatic. The early euornithians also saw the development of many traits associated with modern birds, like strongly keeled breastbones, toothless, beaked portions of their jaws (though most non-avian euornithians retained teeth in other parts of the jaws). Euornithes also included the first avialans to develop true pygostyle and a fully mobile fan of tail feathers, which may have replaced the "hind wing" as the primary mode of aerial maneuverability and braking in flight. A study on mosaic evolution in the avian skull found that the last common ancestor of all Neornithes might have had a beak similar to that of the modern hook-billed vanga and a skull similar to that of the Eurasia ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 11:36:43 -0500 From: "Blood pressure" Subject: 32 Spanish villages immune to heart disease? 32 Spanish villages immune to heart disease? http://cacaobliss.ru.com/ufoO2sdPkOA5uXnrAur3QUVTGn3uma9drPYPz2IbvV6bTqpJ http://cacaobliss.ru.com/_AEHzC0hg5Wh0SYtJEZYJWN3D7pip3d6IrklgAQNzqrBTvjZ the Maastrichtian, the last stage of the Late Cretaceous, proved that the diversification of modern birds started before the Cenozoic era. The affinities of an earlier fossil, the possible galliform Austinornis lentus, dated to about 85 million years ago, are still too controversial to provide a fossil evidence of modern bird diversification. In 2020, Asteriornis from the Maastrichtian was described, it appears to be a close relative of Galloanserae, the earliest diverging lineage within Neognathae. Attempts to reconcile molecular and fossil evidence using genomic-scale DNA data and comprehensive fossil information have not resolved the controversy. However, a 2015 estimate that used a new method for calibrating molecular clocks confirmed that while modern birds originated early in the Late Cretaceous, likely in Western Gondwana, a pulse of diversification in all major groups occurred around the CretaceousbPalaeogene extinction event. Modern birds would have expanded from West Gondwana through two routes. One route was an Antarctic interchange in the Paleogene. The other route was probably via Paleocene land bridges between South America and North America, which allowed for the rapid expansion and diversification of Neornithes into the Holarctic and Paleotropics. On the other hand, the occurrence of Asteriornis in the Northern Hemisphere suggest that Neornithes dispersed out of East Gondwana before the Pale ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 15:32:53 +0200 From: "Oral B 9 Customer Survey" Subject: Your CVS Pharmacy Oral-B 9 Is Ready Your CVS Pharmacy Oral-B 9 Is Ready http://iqblast.za.com/8l8tQLGxdA1WbGFJ-nLni0rFUeCRn2yj404Eubk8y7h1iiYpRA http://iqblast.za.com/p1uN7y80UZRvx45mncufkTS-otR8g21EGkm1G-KQYI9QrHJXJQ bills formed a clade with old world genus Threskiornis, with Nipponia nippon and Eudocimus as progressively earlier offshoots and more distant relatives, and hence casts doubt on the arrangement of the family into ibis and spoonbill subfamilies. Subsequent studies have supported these findin ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 10:04:11 -0500 From: "Trump Decanter Set" Subject: This Decanter Set Was Made for Legends Like Him This Decanter Set Was Made for Legends Like Him http://lottochap.za.com/dPUM7DBhYvYwl_rhY0FJQ3iNq_tb07GdJU5qqVelM6gOCAiJ http://lottochap.za.com/5v8VrACn8Ws0BCAD58yLP4Lx0D8K35OJqliwze1vgcmRY5WE es agree on a Cretaceous age for the most recent common ancestor of modern birds but estimates range from the Early Cretaceous to the latest Cretaceous. Similarly, there is no agreement on whether most of the early diversification of modern birds occurred in the Cretaceous and associated with breakup of the supercontinent Gondwana or occurred later and potentially as a consequence of the CretaceousbPalaeogene extinction event. This disagreement is in part caused by a divergence in the evidence; most molecul ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 07:17:23 -0500 From: "Congratulations" Subject: Important Message for you. Important Message for you. http://livelong.ru.com/HbajLZ9TxYK-7atOTP0LhOvr6Z6xmHMXWmklMI9ikJrBwHO0 http://livelong.ru.com/sADu0vy_WBz326ycLdWxmROC1g524Pr_JNEEQ0Ypcrt94Its nychus. Avialae is also occasionally defined as an apomorphy-based clade (that is, one based on physical characteristics). Jacques Gauthier, who named Avialae in 1986, re-defined it in 2001 as all dinosaurs that possessed feathered wings used in flapping flight, and the birds that descended from them. Despite being currently one of the most widely used, the crown-group definition of Aves has been criticised by some researchers. Lee and Spencer (1997) argued that, contrary to what Gauthier defended, this definition would not increase the stability of the clade and the exact content of Aves will always be unce ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 10:20:21 -0500 From: "AAA Department" Subject: Claim your Car Emergency Kit Claim your Car Emergency Kit http://servicewarranty.sa.com/blaNLk8MzIoOHtRtLw52BgWwoGWW2yNjAOo1VowhdJTVx7eK http://servicewarranty.sa.com/3ta5qX75AdvXGImxOs-np8avrKgg14m3eOzSlVb_o_bFQo_X stem to crash, and humans would obviously suffer from that. Loss of biodiversity also means that humans are losing animals that could have served as biological-control agents and plants that could potentially provide higher-yielding crop varieties, pharmaceutical drugs to cure existing or future diseases (such as cancer), and new resistant crop-varieties for agricultural species susceptible to pesticide-resistant insects or virulent strains of fungi, viruses, and bacteria. The negative effects of habitat destruction usually impact rural populations more directly than urban populations. Across the globe, poor people suffer the most when natural habitat is destroyed, because less natural habitat means fewer natural resources per capita, yet wealthier people and countries can simply pay more to continue to receive more than their per capita share of natural resources. Another way to view the negative effects of habitat destruction is to look at the opportunity cost of destroying a given habitat. In other words, what do people lose out on with the removal of a given habitat? A country may increase its food supply by converting forest land to row-crop agriculture, but the value of the same land may be much larger when it can supply natural resources or services such as clean water, timber, ecot ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #16121 ***********************************************