From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #15165 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Friday, December 6 2024 Volume 14 : Number 15165 Today's Subjects: ----------------- The Medical Go-Bag Released (limited.) ["The Medical GO BAG" Subject: The Medical Go-Bag Released (limited.) The Medical Go-Bag Released (limited.) http://prostate.ru.com/WdU5NjbnmmJCEMU-yzaGT2D0uAJMNRhALWXsQrqoW6DReSOsGA http://prostate.ru.com/xNmt8kqqkOnK0Dxb6KgJwvp2ZH26Yj3DrYLGVMGERpXTvMrBPQ dment was supported by both major parties and was immensely popular. However, it was defeated in Congress when it failed to get the vote of 38 legislatures by 1982. Supporters of an unaltered ERA rejected the Hayden rider, believing an ERA containing the rider did not provide for equality. In 1986, Jerome Himmelstein identified two main theories about the appeal of antifeminism and its role in opposition to the ERA. One theory is that it was a clash between upper-class liberal voters and the older, more conservative lower-class rural voters, who often serve as the center for right-wing movements. This theory identifies particular social classes as more inherently friendly to antifeminism. Another theory holds that women who feel vulnerable and dependent upon men, are likely to oppose anything that threatens that tenuous stability. Under this view, while educated, independent career women may support feminism, housewives who lack such resources are more drawn to antifeminism. Himmelstein says both views are at least partially wrong, arguing that the primary dividing line between feminists and antifeminists is cultural, rather than stemming from differences in economic and social status. There are similarities between income between activists on both sides of the ERA debate. The most indicative factors when predicting ERA position, especially among women, were race, marital status, age, and education. ERA opposition was much higher among white, married, older, and less educated citizens. Women who opposed the ERA tended to fit characteristics consistent with the Religious Right. In 1983, Val Burris said that high-income men opposed the amendm ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 08:40:24 +0100 From: "Charge Card" Subject: Your Portable Charging Solution Awaits! Your Portable Charging Solution Awaits! http://gluconite.sa.com/qobs929MptC_YxjSC0NKrt-bipjFTCPjPflwD7uWaNmq1mFu0w http://gluconite.sa.com/GTqNEfIvM8LfPtdSWqR-2reIOwQnK5U2CXONjSqzUG-5fhtFAQ dment was supported by both major parties and was immensely popular. However, it was defeated in Congress when it failed to get the vote of 38 legislatures by 1982. Supporters of an unaltered ERA rejected the Hayden rider, believing an ERA containing the rider did not provide for equality. In 1986, Jerome Himmelstein identified two main theories about the appeal of antifeminism and its role in opposition to the ERA. One theory is that it was a clash between upper-class liberal voters and the older, more conservative lower-class rural voters, who often serve as the center for right-wing movements. This theory identifies particular social classes as more inherently friendly to antifeminism. Another theory holds that women who feel vulnerable and dependent upon men, are likely to oppose anything that threatens that tenuous stability. Under this view, while educated, independent career women may support feminism, housewives who lack such resources are more drawn to antifeminism. Himmelstein says both views are at least partially wrong, arguing that the primary dividing line between feminists and antifeminists is cultural, rather than stemming from differences in economic and social status. There are similarities between income between activists on both sides of the ERA debate. The most indicative factors when predicting ERA position, especially among women, were race, marital status, age, and education. ERA opposition was much higher among white, married, older, and less educated citizens. Women who opposed the ERA tended to fit characteristics consistent with the Religious Right. In 1983, Val Burris said that high-income men opposed the amendm ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 07:32:49 +0100 From: "Hardware Store Confirmation" Subject: Survey & Reward: Claim Your Ego Power Blower Survey & Reward: Claim Your Ego Power Blower http://prostate.ru.com/NiSpWsyeADY7i50OV2OcoX6IhWFbd4OfbdZ8UDHIZafUfImM http://prostate.ru.com/8hI5pMZs1MmsNpJ1y86FRHtB5ViZ64lvKTQtVvpVzqQGMcLk ne of the major focal points of antifeminism was opposition to women's suffrage, which began as a grassroots movement in 1848 and spanned for 72 years. Opponents of women's entry into institutions of higher learning argued that education was too great a physical burden on women. In Sex in Education: or, a Fair Chance for the Girls (1873), Harvard professor Edward Clarke predicted that if women went to college, their brains would grow bigger and heavier, and their wombs would atrophy. Other antifeminists opposed women's entry into the labor force, their right to join unions, to sit on juries, or to obtain birth control and control of their sexuality. The pro-family movement appeared in the late 19th century, by about 1870. This movement was intended to halt the rising divorce rate and reinforce traditional family values. The National League for the Protection of the Family, formerly known as the Divorce Reform League, took over the movement in 1881. Samuel Dike was one of the founders of the League, and was considered an early expert on divorce. Through his efforts, the League garnered attention from pro-family advocates. It underwent a shift from fighting against divorce to promoting marriage and traditional family. Speaking on behalf of the League in an 1887 address to the Evangelical Alliance Conference, Samuel Dike described the ideal family as having "one man and one woman, united in wedlock, together with their children". This movement built the foundation for many pro-family arguments in contemporary antifem ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 10:18:09 +0100 From: "Roof Replacement USA Partner" Subject: Protect Your Home with a New Roof - Get a Free Quote Today! Protect Your Home with a New Roof - Get a Free Quote Today! http://lipozem.ru.com/4N1OPMXn8scbAGgEZ-IePuEvGQeGBb2rT23AYsuoG87SENmsow http://lipozem.ru.com/jMFjtGLqxhdi2daSl2TszPl9VfEN0b3TIKbEstfe_i4qnDIOmQ wards the centre of their bodies. They walk well on land, and some species feed terrestrially. "Puddle ducks" generally feed on the surface of the water or feed on very shallow bottoms. They are not equipped to dive down several feet like their diving counterparts. The most prominent difference between puddle ducks and divers is the size of the feet. A puddle duck's feet are generally smaller because they do not need the extra propulsion to dive for their forage. Another distinguishing characteristic of puddle ducks when compared with diving ducks is the way in which they take flight when spooked or are on the move. Puddle ducks spring straight up from the water, but diving ducks need to gain momentum to take off, so they must run across the water a short distance to gain flight. Traditionally, most ducks were assigned to either the shelducks, the perching ducks, and the dabbling and diving ducks; the latter two were presumed to make up the Anatinae. However, the perching ducks turned out to be a paraphyletic assemblage of various tropical waterfowl that happened to evolve the ability to perch well in their forested habitat. Several of these, such as the Brazilian teal, were subsequently assigned to the Anatinae. As for the diving ducks, mtDNA cytochrome b and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 sequence data indicates that they are fairly distant from the dabbling ducks. The morphological similarities are due to convergent evolution. In addition, the genus Anas, as traditionally defined, is not monophyletic; several South American speci ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 07:21:18 +0100 From: "Tractor Supply Winner" Subject: Your chance to receive a FREE Tractor Supply Predator 3500W Generator Your chance to receive a FREE Tractor Supply Predator 3500W Generator http://kitemergency.click/BsVvhh7jh_H_sb1Vlk_Him2Qb1wSCI8buQVtP4ffT1F9b48ojg http://kitemergency.click/VABH4et5YiWjVZ8A9fMj2FwwTLIV3LHeuBmEJ5rjkIja7VXXew age was achieved in the US in 1920, and early 20th-century antifeminism was primarily focused on fighting this. Suffragists scoffed at antisuffragists. Anna Howard Shaw, president of the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA) from 1904 to 1915, presumed that the antisuffragists were merely working under the influence of male forces. Later historians tended to dismiss antisuffragists as subscribing to the model of domestic idealism, that a woman's place is in the home. This undermines and belittles the true power and numbers behind the antisuffrage movement, which was primarily led by women themselves. Arguments employed by antisuffragists at the turn of the century had less to do with a woman's place in the home as much as it had to do with a woman's proper place in the public realm. Leaders of the movement often encouraged other women to leave the home and participate in society. What they opposed was women participating in the political sphere. There were two reasons antisuffragists opposed women participating in the political realm. Some argued that women were already overburdened. The majority of them, however, argued that a woman's participation in the political realm would hinder her participation in social and civic duties. If they won the right to vote, women would have to align with a particular party, which would destroy their ability to be politically neutral. Antisuffragists feared this would hinder their influence with legislative authorities. Mid 20th century In 1951, two journalists published Washington Confiden ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 17:06:15 +0100 From: "USA TODAY Automotive" Subject: USA TODAY Automotive Aftermarket Guide USA TODAY Automotive Aftermarket Guide Please click below for a complimentary copy of USA TODAY Automotive Aftermarket USA TODAY Automotive http://lipidenesuport.best/uMCzyWQAkX3MJiFcLwrK-5DJKb8yAsvXoJhpDz2SxQabN2s9jw http://lipidenesuport.best/smNiuN7xluRCuH0GPF7x0xvsQ03uyE7YXAS4ATDue9AlvvvpYQ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 12:10:10 +0100 From: "Energy Discovery" Subject: How to Protect Your Solar Panels How to Protect Your Solar Panels http://thelostgenerator.ru.com/3wq01lypbx_dLv-6ok3gi45_YkeVpD-asXpmu_Bq16zDZ0ec6Q http://thelostgenerator.ru.com/LkgGRSUPUxtW9el1wetaGAqhrPk5istS56V5Z0BlvPfwv8jKjw Housing ensures that members of society have a place to live, whether it is a home or some kind of physical structure for dwelling, lodging or shelter and it includes a range of options from apartments and houses to temporary shelters and emergency accommodations. Access to safe, affordable, and stable housing is essential for a person's health, safety, and well-being. Housing can also impact a person's economic, social, and cultural opportunities, as it influences their access to education, employment, healthcare, and social networks. In many countries, housing policies and programs have been developed to address issues related to affordability, quality, and availability, and to ensure that everyone has access to decent housing. Some have one or more housing authorities, sometimes also called a housing ministry or housing department. In general there are two types of housing, market housing and non-market housing. While market housing consists of apartments, condominiums, private housing, etc. Non-market housing consists of public, social, and cooperative housing among others. Market housing refers to housing that is bought and sold on the open market, with prices and rents determined by supply and demand. This type of housing is typically owned by private individuals or corporations, and the rental rates are determined by the landlord based on the local market conditions. Non-market housing, on the other hand, refers to housing that is provided and managed by the government or non-profit organizations, with the goal of providing affordable housing options to individuals or families with low to moderate incomes. This type of housing is typically subsidized, meaning that the rent is lower than the market rate, and tenants may be eligible for rent assistance pr ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #15165 ***********************************************