From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #13981 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Saturday, May 25 2024 Volume 14 : Number 13981 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Drive with Purpose: Reactivate Your Uber Driver Account Today! ["Uber Res] Expiring Soon: hurry up ! Rewards have arrived! ["Lowes Pro Tools Team" <] Survey Invitation: Enjoy $200 Off with AT&T! ["ATT Support" Subject: Drive with Purpose: Reactivate Your Uber Driver Account Today! Drive with Purpose: Reactivate Your Uber Driver Account Today! http://bladerrelief.shop/-XHSeUYxMNCUGrgRxOTJcESs-jyfGYkIDp95m_SvPya_29aLmw http://bladerrelief.shop/k1tcUNcbCPsaSc2BnMTc7FwPfZU4QaX95Ax7aKeOpxP4qScLow tion Act 1689 (1 Will. & Mar. c. 18), also referred to as the Act of Toleration, was an Act of the Parliament of England. Passed in the aftermath of the Glorious Revolution, it received royal assent on 24 May 1689. The Act allowed for freedom of worship to nonconformists who had pledged to the oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy and rejected transubstantiation, i.e., to Protestants who dissented from the Church of England such as Baptists, Congregationalists or English Presbyterians, but not to Roman Catholics. Nonconformists were allowed their own places of worship and their own schoolteachers, so long as they accepted certain oaths of allegiance. The Act intentionally did not apply to Roman Catholics, Jews, nontrinitarians, and atheists. Further, it continued the existing social and political disabilities for dissenters, including their exclusion from holding political offices and also from the universities. Dissenters were required to register their meeting houses and were forbidden from meeting in private homes. Any preachers who dissented had to be licensed. Between 1772 and 1774, Edward Pickard gathered together dissenting ministers, to campaign for the terms of the Toleration Act for dissenting clergy to be modified. Under his leadership, Parliament twice considered bills to modify the law, but both were unsuccessful and it was not until Pickard and many others had ended their efforts that a new attempt was made in 177 ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 11:02:26 +0200 From: "Lowes Pro Tools Team" Subject: Expiring Soon: hurry up ! Rewards have arrived! Expiring Soon: hurry up ! Rewards have arrived! http://neotonics.ru.com/M19pkHwqQ8deU_pqKHdq49mX5rquJkv3qj0ooDAWnsLqhOo2Cg http://neotonics.ru.com/3tpF_Cd4zUIqjgctMBQnyPXQ3TyTiYkIxwRJ4BeCxre8vOUg_Q tion Act 1689 (1 Will. & Mar. c. 18), also referred to as the Act of Toleration, was an Act of the Parliament of England. Passed in the aftermath of the Glorious Revolution, it received royal assent on 24 May 1689. The Act allowed for freedom of worship to nonconformists who had pledged to the oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy and rejected transubstantiation, i.e., to Protestants who dissented from the Church of England such as Baptists, Congregationalists or English Presbyterians, but not to Roman Catholics. Nonconformists were allowed their own places of worship and their own schoolteachers, so long as they accepted certain oaths of allegiance. The Act intentionally did not apply to Roman Catholics, Jews, nontrinitarians, and atheists. Further, it continued the existing social and political disabilities for dissenters, including their exclusion from holding political offices and also from the universities. Dissenters were required to register their meeting houses and were forbidden from meeting in private homes. Any preachers who dissented had to be licensed. Between 1772 and 1774, Edward Pickard gathered together dissenting ministers, to campaign for the terms of the Toleration Act for dissenting clergy to be modified. Under his leadership, Parliament twice considered bills to modify the law, but both were unsuccessful and it was not until Pickard and many others had ended their efforts that a new attempt was made in 177 ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 10:13:27 +0200 From: "ATT Support" Subject: Survey Invitation: Enjoy $200 Off with AT&T! Survey Invitation: Enjoy $200 Off with AT&T! http://eraceprime.ru.com/fPg7jT4AUe_elzUSU2CmlyqEY0VpUOUOShMmB6kfEZN2VghLIA http://eraceprime.ru.com/a02V1Ow_xHItTHHlxQGCwLjUIlLsVGUvKMqQyhKeEoEsg_ZDcw en from meeting in private homes. Any preachers who dissented had to be licensed. Between 1772 and 1774, Edward Pickard gathered together dissenting ministers, to campaign for the terms of the Toleration Act for dissenting clergy to be modified. Under his leadership, Parliament twice considered bills to modify the law, but both were unsuccessful and it was not until Pickard and many others had ended their efforts that a new attempt was made in 1779. The Act was amended in 1779 by substituting belief in Scripture for belief in the Thirty-Nine Articles of the Anglican churches, but some penalties on holding property remained. Penalties against Unitarians were finally removed in the Doctrine of the Trinity Act 1813. Background William III. giving his royal assent to the Toleration Act. During both the English Commonwealth and the reign of Charles II, nonconforming dissenters including Roman Catholics, were subject to religious persecution and precluded from holding official office. Following the restoration of Charles II, Anglican leaders debated in correspondence and public sermon the extent to which the Anglican church should allow doctrinal latitude; this debate was related to the corresponding debate on broadening church membership and tolerating dissenters. The succession of the Roman Catholic James II was challenged on religious grounds prior to his accession in what became known as the Exclusion Crisis and after he took the crown in 1686 in the Monmouth Rebellion. However, the Tory leadership of the Anglican church initially supported his right to rule based on the theology of active obedience to the monarch. James II sought a repeal of the Test Acts, which imposed various civil ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 12:18:29 +0200 From: "5x Easier" Subject: Richard Karn highly recommends the Pocket Hose Copper Bullet Richard Karn highly recommends the Pocket Hose Copper Bullet http://neurodrinepro.za.com/4PzEMS6aBTyBchWln81BJHqS5yYQkN1aXOKV1U4u31NmEDjytA http://neurodrinepro.za.com/THiK2Y_P52e110nuEblhlE9zrJs3nmQkiVsfEEEsnp9QG9vy United Kingdom, Cabinet papers were subject to the thirty-year rule: until the introduction of FOI legislation, Cabinet papers were not available for thirty years; some information could be withheld for longer. As of 2011 the rule still applies to some information, such as minutes of Cabinet meetings. Some companies provide access, for a fee, to many public records available on the Internet. Many of them specialize in particular types of information, while some offer access to different types of record, typically to professionals in various fields. Some companies sell software with a promise of unlimited access to public records, but may provide nothing more than basic information on how to access already available and generally free public websites. Each year news media, civic groups, libraries, nonprofits, schools and other interested groups sponsor "Sunshine Week." Sunshine Week occurs in mid-March, coinciding with James Madison's birthday and National Freedom of Information Day on the 16th. The purpose of the week is to highlight the idea that "government functions best when it operates in the open." In many states, state legislatures are often exempt from public-records laws that apply to state executive officials and local officials. In 2016, the Associated Press made a request for the emails and daily schedules of state legislative leaders (speakers of state Houses and presidents of state Senates) in all 50 states; a majority denied the request. Court records Of particular significance was the evolution of the common-law right "to access court records to inspect and to copy". The expectation inherent in the common law right to access court records is that any pers ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 10:10:07 +0200 From: "Southwest Opinion Requested" Subject: Claim Your Fifty Dollar Southwest Airlines Reward Claim Your Fifty Dollar Southwest Airlines Reward http://neotonics.ru.com/bn4K607OBsOVFhKln94D5nV_OKPyC6QrEtl9dOJW18Jq4MSClg http://neotonics.ru.com/FLSrjgN0QtWQ_ekm_XGhAig2IVFNqADkQjj_UuZEjVL8VAwirQ orean nuclear test was the underground detonation of a nuclear device conducted on Monday, 25 May 2009 by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. This was its second nuclear test, the first test having taken place in October 2006. Following the nuclear test, Pyongyang also conducted several missile tests. A scientific paper later estimated the yield as 2.35 kilotons. The test was nearly universally condemned by the international community. Following the test, the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 1874 condemning the test and tightening sanctions on the country. It was widely believed that the test was conducted as a result of the succession crisis in the country. After Kim Jong-Il suffered a stroke in the summer of 2008, arrangements were made for his third son, Kim Jong-un, to take power upon his death. It is believed the North Koreans conducted the nuclear test to show that, even in a time of possible weakness, it did not intend to give up its nuclear weapons program. Background Main article: North Korea and weapons of mass destruction North Korea (officially the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, or DPRK) had threatened to conduct a second nuclear test in pr ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 16:52:11 +0200 From: "Poor Posture" Subject: 1 EASY move fixes ugly posture (try today) 1 EASY move fixes ugly posture (try today) http://halofrequency.za.com/7-5fDgQfrNBK720oYykXSzixCxgf8ksYfUrRvuUAjMc2Pg6qUQ http://halofrequency.za.com/4N5Ay8b9TxHra7EEfca5Z35PxdMTaJ5AT5ILuxJv8hO0Evbemw ds are records of public business, they are not necessarily available without restriction, although Freedom of Information legislation (FOI) that has been gradually introduced in many jurisdictions since the 1960s has made access easier. Each government has policies and regulations that govern the availability of information contained in public records. A common restriction is that data about a person is not normally available to others; for example, the California Public Records Act (PRA) states that "except for certain explicit exceptions, personal information maintained about an individual may not be disclosed without the person's consent". For example, in California, when a couple fills out a marriage license application, they have the option of checking the box as to whether the marriage is "confidential" (Record will be closed, and not opened to public once recorded) or "public" (record will become public record once recorded). Essentially, if the marriage record is public, a copy of the record can be ordered from the county in which the marriage occurred.[dead link] In the United Kingdom, Cabinet papers were subject to the thirty-year rule: until the introduction of FOI legislation, Cabinet papers were not available for thirty years; some information could be withheld for longer. As of 2011 the rule still applies to some information, such as minutes of Cabinet meetings. Some companies provide access, for a fee, to many public records available on the Internet. Many of them specialize in particular types of information, while some offer access to different types of record, typically to professionals in various fields. Some companies sell software with a promise of unlimited access to public records, but may provide nothing more than basic information on how to access already available and generally free public websites. Each year news media, civic groups, libraries, nonprofits, schools and other inte ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #13981 ***********************************************