From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #12990 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Tuesday, January 9 2024 Volume 14 : Number 12990 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Say Goodbye To Cold And Stiff Feet And Enjoy Your Favorite Winter Activities Again! ["Heated Socks" Subject: Say Goodbye To Cold And Stiff Feet And Enjoy Your Favorite Winter Activities Again! Say Goodbye To Cold And Stiff Feet And Enjoy Your Favorite Winter Activities Again! - ----------------------------------------------------------------- [IMAGE] Warmer socks may be a good choice, but do they really make you feel warm? Floor heating may be a better way, but will it consume more electricity? The heating appliance may be a must-have item in winter, but is it easy to carry for outdoors sports? [TABLE NOT SHOWN] Get Hilipert Heated Socks NOW B If you does't like this, please Click here 1327 Timberbrook Lane Gypsum, CO 81637 B B [IMAGE] ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 13:25:22 +0000 From: "InstallMySolarPanels.com" Subject: Do This Before You Get Solar Panels (It's Genius) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 13:35:50 +0100 From: "Blurry sight" Subject: the 3 20âs rule: 20/20 vision in 20 days! the 3 20bs rule: 20/20 vision in 20 days! http://usairlinetravelsurvey.buzz/1m1BOKSBriLOASibPRtAz7Z82jz3hzLVKmEiiIevk5I7ZyiIEA http://usairlinetravelsurvey.buzz/XTpNGEb6B1NvDfx4bERjGI08Oxlz9QgP2_oWtZXTqHnZbfx2cA The three-step test was first established in relation to the exclusive right of reproduction under Article 9(2) of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works in 1967. Article 9 of the Berne Convention states that: Right of Reproduction: 1. Generally; 2. Possible exceptions; 3. Sound and visual recordings - (1) Authors of literary and artistic works protected by this Convention shall have the exclusive right of authorizing the reproduction of these works, in any manner or form. (2) It shall be a matter for legislation in the countries of the Union to permit the reproduction of such works in certain special cases, provided that such reproduction does not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and does not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author. (3) Any sound or visual recording shall be considered as a reproduction for the purposes of this Convention. The test is vague; But, spelled out in the formulation of Hugenholtz and Okediji, the three steps are: Limitations and exceptions cannot be "overly broad" [= "certain special cases"] Limitations and exceptions cannot "rob right holders of a real or potential source of income that is substantive" [= "conflicting with normal exploitation of the work"] Limitations and exceptions cannot "do disproportional harm to the rights holders" [= "prejudice legitimate intere ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 09:28:30 +0100 From: "Costco Department" Subject: Ultralite Activated Carbon Face Mask Ultralite Activated Carbon Face Mask http://walmartninjakichensurvey.today/Lw8cA4tVWH85IL-aEJd2lHyThrPEJCW2WQYfD1f7gR1sFyPOuw http://walmartninjakichensurvey.today/Lqmf-KqtZmmzb17AcS76aUAQ4Ynb8Uv5DFVBtzJbnms4FG7TeA On June 7, 1948, Justice Koch denied the injunction, rejecting each of the composers' theories. First, the court held that the composers did not have a right of privacy under New York law because those who use public domain works may publish them along with the names of their authors. Second, assuming that it had the authority to issue an injunction for libel under New York law, the court rejected the defamation claim because the composers had failed to prove that the use of their music implied that they supported the message of the film. Specifically, the court held that, unlike copyrighted worksbfor which the public expects that their authors have consented to their use, probably in exchange for being paidbthere cannot be an implication of support when a work is in the public domain and available for use by all. The court addressed the composers' third and fourth claims together, concluding that their theory of injury "leads inescapably to the Doctrine of Moral Right". The court, assuming moral rights existed in United States law and recognizing that a court could grant a moral rights claim, held that the composers had not shown such a violation because there was no clear standard of adjudication. The court asked: "Is the standard to be good taste, artistic worth, political belie ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 12:34:19 +0100 From: "Hearing Loss" Subject: âIt worked too wellâ - Tinnitus Cure Banned by the CCP Makes a Comeback bIt worked too wellb - Tinnitus Cure Banned by the CCP Makes a Comeback http://instahardmalein.ltd/N70lSDoHgtO6InL8hm63HhG9DbfS8SVUDl9OE2ZQZE2vO9-q9Q http://instahardmalein.ltd/g8TWLU0tOJpFlmOKGSLcBE6cQrs7mWGbpPLusyYxciYGSW1HJg tice Koch denied the injunction, rejecting each of the composers' theories. First, the court held that the composers did not have a right of privacy under New York law because those who use public domain works may publish them along with the names of their authors. Second, assuming that it had the authority to issue an injunction for libel under New York law, the court rejected the defamation claim because the composers had failed to prove that the use of their music implied that they supported the message of the film. Specifically, the court held that, unlike copyrighted worksbfor which the public expects that their authors have consented to their use, probably in exchange for being paidbthere cannot be an implication of support when a work is in the public domain and available for use by all. The court addressed the composers' third and fourth claims together, concluding that their theory of injury "leads inescapably to the Doctrine of Moral Right". The court, assuming moral rights existed in United States law and recognizing that a court could grant a moral rights claim, held that the composers had not shown such a violation because there was no clear standard of adjudication. The court asked: "Is the standard to be good taste, artistic ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 17:30:23 +0000 From: "Forward Head Posture FIX" Subject: How much does your head weigh? (not what you think) [IMAGE] We've been talking about Ugly Forward Head Posture all week and what you can do to fix it in less than 15-minutes. Sometimes it's called, Text Neck, Tech Neck, Giraffe Neck, Chicken Head and even Turtle Neck. Do you have a neck like one of the animals in the picture below from texting too much? [IMAGE] If you do, you're not alone. Close to 90% of the population has this condition. I was one of them too until I started using this..... 15-minute routine get rid of ugly text neck Mary M. Wright B If you does't like this, please Click here 1237 Thompson Street Paramount, CA 90723 B B [IMAGE] ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 18:02:51 +0100 From: "ED Fix" Subject: She got a very naughty look on her face... She got a very naughty look on her face... http://clickdesignspro.today/-_aBAZ0GH4YvDdFpOa_laOD2Jfc1W6P0mf5z0TfUJVQ8WCfUAQ http://clickdesignspro.today/88iSW67_D61sDMHWNmaLG3rqyKFmWZM7SPYglQckex9vN_k45g Humans cooperate for the same reasons as other animals: immediate benefit, genetic relatedness, and reciprocity, but also for particularly human reasons, such as honesty signaling (indirect reciprocity), cultural group selection, and for reasons having to do with cultural evolution. Language allows humans to cooperate on a very large scale. Certain studies have suggested that fairness affects human cooperation; individuals are willing to punish at their own cost (altruistic punishment) if they believe that they are being treated unfairly. Sanfey, et al. conducted an experiment where 19 individuals were scanned using MRI while playing an ultimatum game in the role of the responder. They received offers from other human partners and from a computer partner. Responders refused unfair offers from human partners at a significantly higher rate than those from a computer partner. The experiment also suggested that altruistic punishment is associated with negative emotions that are generated in unfair situations by the anterior insula of the brain. It has been observed that image scoring, where a participant learns of their counterpart's prior behavior or reputation, promotes cooperative behavior in situations where direct reciprocity is unlikely. This implies that in situations where reputation and status are involved, humans tend to cooperate more. Many organisms other than apes, such as fi ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 08:52:51 +0100 From: "Walgreens Shopper Gift Opportunity" Subject: Congratulations! You can get a $50 Walgreens gift card! Congratulations! You can get a $50 Walgreens gift card! hhttp://walmartninjakichensurvey.today/ze-DtZG9Wh_FKH6WxHVDwcq7AIL_l17pX7AAGuvlLL8204oSNA http://walmartninjakichensurvey.today/ir5c8nmIl79eGbXVxZJA_QhTVMO7GbgPCKmNxPxDqz7zfGOt7g At oral argument and in their motion, the composers conceded that the compositions at issue were in the public domain in the United States because the Soviet Union and the United States had not entered into a copyright agreement. They asserted four grounds for issuance of an injunction: violation of the right to privacy under Section 51 of the New York Civil Rights Law; defamation of the composers by associating their work with an anti-Soviet stance, implying their disloyalty; deliberate infliction of an injury without just cause; and violation of the composers' moral rights. According to the law professor Justin Hughes, the privacy claim rested on a right to anonymity and the contention that use of the music constituted a public distortion of the composers' beliefs. Likewise, the defamation claim turned on the composers' protest that the music was being used for a political purpose that they did not agree with. The composers also asserted a legal theory that was novel in 1940s United States jurisprudence: the moral rights of authors. As of 1948, no United States court had recognized the legal doctrine of moral rights in authorship. European legal systems, by contrast, had recognized the moral right of an author to prevent the distortion of their works. In their briefing, the composers relied on a 1940 Harvard Law Review article, which argued that moral rights had a grounding in United States case law, and they contended that their moral rights were harmed by the political use of their musi ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 13:46:56 +0100 From: "Joanne Riley" Subject: Youâve Been Considered for inclusion with Whoâs Who⦠Youbve Been Considered for inclusion with Whobs Whob& http://instahardmalein.ltd/mVRRhs76BfzVvBURPyjlQ4hhM_Lj-0cRmPH7NgjjYG5U_qxaJA http://instahardmalein.ltd/gPQHXPCCLfknPq3a61FaeerZJ3k9BDeJiqcIAHDgSifcb0FiHQ The technical legal reasoning which has been applied to suggest how this wording should be interpreted is arcane (see the references below). To date, only one legal case (before a WTO dispute settlement panel, involving U.S. copyright exemptions allowing restaurants, bars and shops to play radio and TV broadcasts without paying licensing fees, passed in 1998 as a rider to the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act) has actually required an interpretation of the test. The three-step test may prove to be extremely important if any nations attempt to reduce the scope of copyright law, because unless the WTO decides that their modifications comply with the test, such states are likely to face trade sanctions. Exceptions to copyright protection are required to be clearly defined and narrow in scope and reach. For instance, the three-step test was invoked as a justification for refusing certain exceptions to copyright wished for by members of the French parliament during the examination of the controversial DADVSI copyright bill. Patents TRIPs Article 30, covering limitations and exemptions to patent law, is also derived from a somewhat different three-step test, that includes "taking account of the legitimate interests of third parties." Exceptions to exclusive patent rights are not subject to this test if they are implemented through Article 31 of the TRIPS, or Article ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 15:27:24 +0000 From: "best quality knives" Subject: Huusk chefâs knife features a precision, laser-carved Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:27:14 +0100 From: "Health and Beauty" Subject: #1 Tip for Removing Lines and Wrinkles #1 Tip for Removing Lines and Wrinkles http://deltaairlinessuvey.today/MzOm5Gccn7stR-nG8QTPKcdQCq8jr9byRKJMU5FwlBJZRA0SLg http://deltaairlinessuvey.today/H_vVrJn6RiR8uGGg-Ubb3lkuSOQhV5yLqrfIHeA7Hlr351DD2A he Berne Convention requires its parties to recognize the protection of works of authors from other parties to the convention at least as well as those of its own nationals. For example, French authors' rights law applies to anything published, distributed, performed, or in any other way accessible in France, regardless of where it was originally created, if the country of origin of that work is in the Berne Union. In addition to establishing a system of equal treatment that harmonised copyright amongst parties, the agreement also required member states to provide strong minimum standards for copyright law. Author's rights under the Berne Convention must be automatic; it is prohibited to require formal registration. However, when the United States joined the convention on 1 March 1989, it continued to make statutory damages and attorney's fees only available for registered works. However, Moberg v Leygues (a 2009 decision of a Delaware Federal District Court) held that the protections of the Berne Convention are supposed to essentially be "frictionless", meaning no registration requirements can be imposed on a work from a different Berne member country. This means Berne member countries can require works originating in their own country to be registered and/or deposited, but cannot require these formalities of works from other Berne member countri ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 08:48:11 +0100 From: "Walgreens Shopper Feedback" Subject: Shopper, You can qualify to get a $50 Walgreens gift card! Shopper, You can qualify to get a $50 Walgreens gift card! hhttp://walmartninjakichensurvey.today/lZqsTC510WFN2f0V9SL36w1BXDwWmD7sxIdGUxi3jAvS9Bastw http://walmartninjakichensurvey.today/rv8lxkKCAwxR8gEuStna_kYQ9i7SH8ysghs0PvhXutX5ee0AwA At oral argument and in their motion, the composers conceded that the compositions at issue were in the public domain in the United States because the Soviet Union and the United States had not entered into a copyright agreement. They asserted four grounds for issuance of an injunction: violation of the right to privacy under Section 51 of the New York Civil Rights Law; defamation of the composers by associating their work with an anti-Soviet stance, implying their disloyalty; deliberate infliction of an injury without just cause; and violation of the composers' moral rights. According to the law professor Justin Hughes, the privacy claim rested on a right to anonymity and the contention that use of the music constituted a public distortion of the composers' beliefs. Likewise, the defamation claim turned on the composers' protest that the music was being used for a political purpose that they did not agree with. The composers also asserted a legal theory that was novel in 1940s United States jurisprudence: the moral rights of authors. As of 1948, no United States court had recognized the legal doctrine of moral rights in authorship. European legal systems, by contrast, had recognized the moral right of an author to prevent the distortion of their works. In their briefing, the composers relied on a 1940 Harvard Law Review article, which argued that moral rights had a grounding in United States case law, and they contended that their moral rights were harmed by the political use of their musi ------------------------------ Date: [date] From: "New York Bagel Delivery" Subject: NY's Best Bagels now delivers nationwide NY's Best Bagels now delivers nationwide http://usairlinetravelsurvey.buzz/3-KwEOLVC1nmYoGc1ehdkgmm8H0-C9dmo0yAyrQRWHAHBbR0sg http://usairlinetravelsurvey.buzz/vBM3Jy1rPd4DYpb25H3TPkF9OPNzFm6TTqjRH4PojfxSN81_EQ The DSB is, in effect, a session of the General Council of the WTO: that is, all of the representatives of the WTO member governments, usually at ambassadorial level, meeting together. It decides the outcome of a trade dispute on the recommendation of a Dispute Panel and (possibly) on a report from the Appellate Body of WTO, which may have amended the Panel recommendation if a party chose to appeal. Only the DSB can make these decisions: Panels and the Appellate Body are limited to making recommendations. The DSB uses a special decision procedure known as 'reverse consensus' or 'consensus against' that makes it almost certain that the Panel recommendations in a dispute will be accepted. The process requires that the recommendations of the Panel (as amended by the Appellate Body) should be adopted "unless" there is a consensus of the members against adoption. This has never happened, and because the nation 'winning' under the Panel's ruling would have to join this reverse consensus, it is difficult to conceive of how it ever could. Once it has decided on the case, i.e., whether the complaint had been shown to be right or wrong, the DSB may direct the 'losing' Member to take action to bring its laws, regulations or policies into conformity with the WTO Agreements. This is the only direction that emerges from a WTO dispute. There is no concept of "punishment" or even restitution. The DSB will give the losing party a "reasonable period of time" in which to restore the conformity of its l ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 19:03:27 +0100 From: "DaVinci Brain Code" Subject: Ancient âsongâ helps 18,000+ find money effortlessly Ancient bsongb helps 18,000+ find money effortlessly http://clickdesignspro.today/jFOrNvQ8RhK5hyKHOH76psRoZNB-gOmSv_bVvyWqreTWs5qjNw http://clickdesignspro.today/y05Qc2RunwrNuLFzJ-qeyC06klpOqDluUmXkRjixT8oYP8b3oA The "Blood in the Water" match (Hungarian: melbourne-i vC)rfC