From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #12680 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Friday, November 24 2023 Volume 14 : Number 12680 Today's Subjects: ----------------- We were unable to deliver your package... Reschedule your delivery date. ["Track & Trace" Subject: We were unable to deliver your package... Reschedule your delivery date. We were unable to deliver your package... Reschedule your delivery date. http://whoswhoplatinum.services/lUSMjtCg7EO_sGZIfcNZKx9fDo-lw3NbmFWSEhRHJK5LHa5Paw http://whoswhoplatinum.services/BidieOJ5HOLwAF3xMXVMiPfkdMaR-_UTMtfJbtzKo_DgU_6hbw American Albright school asserted that the biblical narrative of conquest would be affirmed by archaeological record; and indeed for much of the 20th century archaeology appeared to support the biblical narrative, including excavations at Beitin (identified as Bethel), Tel ed-Duweir, (identified as Lachish), Hazor, and Jericho. However, flaws in the conquest narrative appeared. The most high-profile example was the "fall of Jericho", excavated by John Garstang in the 1930s. Garstang originally announced that he had found fallen walls dating to the time of the biblical Battle of Jericho, but later revised the destruction to a much earlier period. Kathleen Kenyon dated the destruction of the walled city to the middle of the 16th century (c. 1550 BCE), too early to match the usual dating of the Exodus to Pharaoh Ramses, on the basis of her excavations in the early 1950s. The same conclusion, based on an analysis of all the excavation findings, was reached by Piotr Bienkowski. By the 1960s it had become clear that the archaeological record did not, in fact, support the account of the conquest given in Joshua: the cities which the Bible records as having been destroyed by the Israelites were either uninhabited at the time, or, if destroyed, were destroyed at widely different times, not in one brief period. The consensus for the conquest narrative was eventually abandoned in the late 20th century. Peake's Commentary on the Bible ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #12680 ***********************************************