From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #12654 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Tuesday, November 21 2023 Volume 14 : Number 12654 Today's Subjects: ----------------- People With Early Alzheimerâs Do This Bathroom Mistake ["Bathroom Habit" ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 16:03:23 +0100 From: "Bathroom Habit" Subject: People With Early Alzheimerâs Do This Bathroom Mistake People With Early Alzheimerbs Do This Bathroom Mistake http://mcgramfirearmholder.live/IzKz2xtayAdOel0nE2xrbo5SeAF6Z4vD4sfPpwNZSbPBGRX-Yg http://mcgramfirearmholder.live/r7UqKh28byPHE9NLA18y6oYTMDlEg3-q-t0pCT0YzxYoYnNaCw Some features of factual knowledge are widely accepted: it is a form of cognitive success that establishes epistemic contact with reality. However, there are still various disagreements about its exact nature even though it has been studied intensely. Different factors are responsible for these disagreements. Some theorists try to furnish a practically useful definition by describing its most noteworthy and easily identifiable features. Others engage in an analysis of knowledge, which aims to provide a theoretically precise definition that identifies the set of essential features characteristic for all instances of knowledge and only for them. Differences in the methodology may also cause disagreements. In this regard, some epistemologists use abstract and general intuitions in order to arrive at their definitions. A different approach is to start from concrete individual cases of knowledge to determine what all of them have in common. Yet another method is to focus on linguistic evidence by studying how the term "knowledge" is commonly used. Different standards of knowledge are further sources of disagreement. A few theorists set these standards very high by demanding that absolute certainty or infallibility is necessary. On such a view, knowledge is a very rare thing. Theorists more in tune with ordinary language usually demand lower standards and see knowledge as something commonly found in everyday life. As justified true belief The historically most influential definition, discussed since ancient Greek philosophy, characterizes knowledge in relation to three essential features: as (1) a belief that is (2) true and (3) justified. There is still wide acceptance that the first two features are correct, i.e. that knowledge is a mental state that affirms a true proposition. However, there is a lot of dispute about the third feature: justification. This feature is usuall ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #12654 ***********************************************