From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #10128 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Wednesday, November 16 2022 Volume 14 : Number 10128 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Problems getting hard? Check out THIS... ["AlphaExtreme AffiliateAlphaExt] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 16:15:13 +0100 From: "AlphaExtreme AffiliateAlphaExtreme" Subject: Problems getting hard? Check out THIS... Problems getting hard? Check out THIS... http://massalong.bid/piw7GaOxsVFvigoArGsfKtWTbH463KPGYuAblP3pi6E7iLKVmA http://massalong.bid/VMfNHTmsFkBCE9j2u5mBmdg4IUjK_Kt0GSHDf6m3mBz9Z92pqw he marriage was politically important as part of Eadwig's efforts to strengthen his position as king, and it may have been seen as a threat by the circle around Edgar as it could have cut him out from the prospect of inheriting the crown. According to version D of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (ASC D), in 958 "Archbishop Oda separated King Eadwig and Clfgifu, because they were too closely related". It is not certain what their relationship was, but Eadwig's wife has been identified as the Clfgifu who made a will naming Cthelweard as her brother, and he has been identified as the chronicler Cthelweard, who was descended from King Cthelred I, which would have made her Eadwig's third cousin once removed. Simon Keynes also questions B's account of the coronation feast, suggesting that Oda may have objected to the marriage on the ground that it was against ecclesiastical law, and that B's version may have been based on an unsuccessful attempt by Dunstan and Cynesige to dissuade hi ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V14 #10128 ***********************************************