From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V6 #6 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Monday, January 7 2002 Volume 06 : Number 006 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: something totally innocuous [fru_manchu@hotmail.com (wild Bill)] Re: something totally innocuous [fru_manchu@hotmail.com (wild Bill)] Re: something totally innocuous [Lori Martin ] Re: something totally innocuous [mrsfillyjonk@hotmail.com (Richard Butter] Re: something totally innocuous [mrsfillyjonk@hotmail.com (Richard Butter] Re: his point [mrsfillyjonk@hotmail.com (Richard Butterworth)] Re: something totally innocuous [fru_manchu@hotmail.com (wild Bill)] Re: something totally innocuous ["Chris K @*_*@" ] Re: something totally innocuous [fru_manchu@hotmail.com (wild Bill)] Re: something totally innocuous ["Chris K @*_*@" ] Re: his point [cfegrl@yahoo.com (Cookie)] Re: his point [darlene88@yahoo.com (Jen Meyers)] Re: his point [cfegrl@yahoo.com (Cookie)] Re: his point ["Chris K @*_*@" ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 5 Jan 2002 22:32:52 -0800 From: fru_manchu@hotmail.com (wild Bill) Subject: Re: something totally innocuous "Chris K @*_*@" wrote in message news:<3C377861.895D8113@ehmail.com>... > wild Bill wrote: > > > What? Are you saying that all people that like the cold are bad > > people? Cause there are lots of people that like the snow, I being > > one of them and I *totally* take offense to the idea that you would > > insinuate that people who don't the cold are bad people. Who are you > > to question my morality? > > Just because you *enjoyed* Burk's Hell and all > that heat, I'm gonna question it. You don't like > the cold and I know it! You prefer 100F degrees > and humidity. What? Can't a guy like both the hot and the cold? And what's it with all the weather nazi's rearing their heads in this newsgroup? Plus, Burke's Hell had a good beer tent, which was COLD. Sometimes I ilke the heat, sometimes I like the cold. Sometimes I feel like a nut, sometimes I don't. Its my perogative. And Richard give me my damn dress back. > > And why do they call them snowmen anyways? Isn't that sexist? > > And they aren't anatomically correct. Well, that > is, unless you make them. My lord woman, think of the children! I mean what if all snow*people* had anatomically correct privies then that would lead to five year olds having promiscuous sex. Do you want that on your conscience? Or maybe you do. You filthy communist. > > Jian is not a dreadful weather*person*. You have no clue what his > > education is, he could be trained in weather prediction. I for one, > > believe if Jian says that it is cold that we should probably take him > > for his word. > > If and when Jian sings "Baby, It's Cold Outside" I > might believe him, but for now...until I see him > on the weather channel, I'm not going to. I think Jian would do a lovely rendition of "baby, it's cold outside" and he could sing it with himself. He could also sing another great weather classic, "It's raining men" and do a bang up job. But I suppose that you would say that he wouldn't have any idea what a male storm would look like. "It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt." -- Voltaire "wild" Bill ------------------------------ Date: 5 Jan 2002 23:27:37 -0800 From: fru_manchu@hotmail.com (wild Bill) Subject: Re: something totally innocuous Lori cheerfully speaketh thus: > Well *I* like the cold. I've even been known to use snowshoes. In the > Greater MegaCD of Gatineau. In February. Are you questioning MY > morality? Humph! You don't know the slightest thing ABOUT my morality. > Well, except for that weekend we shared a bed ... but I digress. Of course, I am not questioning your morality snooziwuzziebumpkins. My point was that there are a plethora of human societal philosophies that promote the conception of snow and its functional use for the redistribution of the cold. According to the first law of thermodynamics, "Energy can be changed from one form to another, but it cannot be created or destroyed" and cold being a tangible extension of energy, there will always be cold. There may or may not be snow. It is completely irrelevant whether or not you believe snow is moral or not, as cold is outside the trappings of the "normal" human precepts of wrong and right. It is illogical to feel guilt over snow. Reguardless of your belief system, you, we, everyone, are inconsquential to the cold and by inference, the snow. Now what's your point? "wild" Bill ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 08:32:25 GMT From: Lori Martin Subject: Re: something totally innocuous wild bill clarified: > It is illogical to feel guilt over snow. Well, that's a big load off my mind, let me tell you. Thanks for letting me know. My conscience is now about 10 pounds lighter. Whew. > Reguardless of your belief system, you, we, everyone, are > inconsquential to the cold and by inference, the snow. That certainly explains a great deal about the weather patterns of the past week, doesn't it? Athens has called in the military to deal with the snow, Atlanta's been closed down, but you and I can't snowshoe tomorrow unless something extraordinary happens that permits flakes to remain as flakes on 42F street surfaces. Of course, I suppose Chrissy can snowshoe pretty much anywhere she likes. ;) > Now what's your point? Was I supposed to have one? Oh dear. I thought this newsgroup was all about His Point. (And he did have one.) - -- Lori ------------------------------ Date: 6 Jan 2002 05:28:02 -0800 From: mrsfillyjonk@hotmail.com (Richard Butterworth) Subject: Re: something totally innocuous fru_manchu@hotmail.com (wild Bill) wrote in message news:<9b12aec3.0201052232.221850fd@posting.google.com>... > "It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open > it and remove all doubt." -- Voltaire "110 AC" -- Voltmeter. Richard ------------------------------ Date: 6 Jan 2002 05:25:33 -0800 From: mrsfillyjonk@hotmail.com (Richard Butterworth) Subject: Re: something totally innocuous fru_manchu@hotmail.com (wild Bill) wrote in message news:<9b12aec3.0201050959.6d068ac4@posting.google.com>... > Richard wrote: Can I start this post by asking you as politely as possible not to call me `Richard' and call me `Smoochysnogs' instead. Thank you. > What? Are you saying that all people that like the cold are bad > people? Speaking on behalf of the vast majority of the people on this newsgroup I think its best if you tell us what your meteorological position is. Nimbus? Light precipitation? Mistral winds sweeping over the Azores? Hmm? > I *totally* take offense to the idea that you would > insinuate that people who don't the cold are bad people. In that case I suggest you re-read mt previous post. > I for one, > believe if Jian says that it is cold that we should probably take him > for his word. And I for one am going to thow up if I hear one more person disgrace our weather system. Richard ------------------------------ Date: 6 Jan 2002 07:49:43 -0800 From: mrsfillyjonk@hotmail.com (Richard Butterworth) Subject: Re: his point Lori Martin wrote in message news:<3C3756D7.59817A2C@verizon.net>... > But apparently this doesn't sound so amusing to Eric. I don't think that his failure > to be amused by donning a feather boa or slinky evening dress is necessarily a situation that > needs intervention, but rather a situation of "to each his own". A feather boa? Now you see I'd have thought that Eric was much more a lemon yellow crimplene polka dotted matching handbag and accessories type. But a feather boa, you say? Well yes, each to his own, exactly. Richard ------------------------------ Date: 6 Jan 2002 11:20:44 -0800 From: fru_manchu@hotmail.com (wild Bill) Subject: Re: something totally innocuous Richard wrote: > Can I start this post by asking you as politely as possible not to > call me `Richard' and call me `Smoochysnogs' instead. Thank you. I'm sorry Richard, but I will not call you Smoochysnogs or Snoogiewoogie or Snuzzlewuzzle or any other sorta affectionate term you can come up with. I think you do discrace to the time honoured naming convention of English speakers everywhere by even thinking about attempting to change the way we refer to each other. How dare you even think to suggest to question the founding principles of proper naming? > > What? Are you saying that all people that like the cold are bad > > people? > > Speaking on behalf of the vast majority of the people on this > newsgroup I think its best if you tell us what your meteorological > position is. Nimbus? Light precipitation? Mistral winds sweeping over > the Azores? Hmm? I don't care. I never liked weather anyway. And where the hell are the Azores anyway? Some place outside the U S of A, no doubt, you filthy foreigner! > > I *totally* take offense to the idea that you would > > insinuate that people who don't the cold are bad people. > > In that case I suggest you re-read mt previous post. Speaking of posting, you know that I once sent a letter to Santa claus and he responded to it. But I now, my whole childhood has been ruined because I found out from a mother's former roomate that the USPS answers letters to Santa and that Santa doesn't really exist. But between us, I am fairly confident that Santa is still around. > > I for one, > > believe if Jian says that it is cold that we should probably take him > > for his word. > > And I for one am going to thow up if I hear one more person disgrace > our weather system. Well, let me hand you a barf bucket [1]. It's plainly obvious that Mother Nature is a tinkerer and not very serious about her work either. No consistancy, rain one day, snow the next, rain again, some sun. What is that? I'll tell you what it is, sloppy, random, crazy. If mother nature picked any kind of logical scheme, this whole weather prediction stuff would be a snap and you wouldn't need a professional like Jian to help you to determine whether or not it was cold. "wild" Bill [1] hopefully not the same bucket i handed out earlier, although if so then prehaps cleaned with some sorta powerful cleaning agent or something. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 19:19:26 GMT From: "Chris K @*_*@" Subject: Re: something totally innocuous wild Bill wrote: > What? Can't a guy like both the hot and the cold? And what's it with > all the weather nazi's rearing their heads in this newsgroup? Plus, > Burke's Hell had a good beer tent, which was COLD. Sometimes I ilke > the heat, sometimes I like the cold. Sometimes I feel like a nut, > sometimes I don't. Its my perogative. And Richard give me my damn > dress back. Now it's all about Beer and Candy Bars! What the hell is the matter with you Bill?! Did you lose some facial hair or something that caused your brain cells to go with it?! > My lord woman, think of the children! I mean what if all snow*people* > had anatomically correct privies then that would lead to five year > olds having promiscuous sex. Do you want that on your conscience? Or > maybe you do. You filthy communist. A Poem: A chubby little snowman Had a carrot nose Along came a rabbit And what do you suppose? That hungry little bunny, Looking for his lunch, ATE the snowman's carrot nose... Nibble, nibble, CRUNCH! > I think Jian would do a lovely rendition of "baby, it's cold outside" > and he could sing it with himself. He could also sing another great > weather classic, "It's raining men" and do a bang up job. But I > suppose that you would say that he wouldn't have any idea what a male > storm would look like. Right! He wouldn't know anything about what it would be like to be caught in a storm like that ["ROWR!"]. But I'm sure he could do a great version of "Rainy Days and Mondays" and really mean it...because I think they get everyone down. > "It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open > it and remove all doubt." -- Voltaire One can find so many pains when the rain is falling. - --John Steinbeck Christine. ------------------------------ Date: 6 Jan 2002 11:31:46 -0800 From: fru_manchu@hotmail.com (wild Bill) Subject: Re: something totally innocuous Lori slashed the newsgroup monster thusly: > > Reguardless of your belief system, you, we, everyone, are > > inconsquential to the cold and by inference, the snow. > > That certainly explains a great deal about the weather patterns of the past > week, doesn't it? Athens has called in the military to deal with the snow, > Atlanta's been closed down, but you and I can't snowshoe tomorrow unless > something extraordinary happens that permits flakes to remain as flakes on 42F > street surfaces. Lori, my dear, you need to start thinking out of the box. Lighten up a little. Wear snowshoes without there being snow. It is so pedestrian to slavishly cling to the societal norms. This would do you so much good. It has for me, although it did make driving to work a little more exciting. But you see what I mean? You need to expand your horizons a little. Go out in a bathing suit in Februrary, wear snowshoes in July. Frollic in dew covered field, under the bright full moon, wearing an evening gown and some moon boots. > Was I supposed to have one? Oh dear. I thought this newsgroup was all about > His Point. (And he did have one.) And a fine point it was. I am all for Jian saying that it is cold outside, if in fact, it is cold. "wild" Bill ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 23:50:37 GMT From: "Chris K @*_*@" Subject: Re: something totally innocuous snuggywuggy Bill wrote: > Speaking of posting, you know that I once sent a letter to Santa claus > and he responded to it. But I now, my whole childhood has been ruined > because I found out from a mother's former roomate that the USPS > answers letters to Santa and that Santa doesn't really exist. But > between us, I am fairly confident that Santa is still around. And why do you believe this? Because The Globe and Mail said so in their letter, "Yes Jian, there is a Santa Claus?" > It's plainly obvious that Mother Nature is a tinkerer and not very > serious about her work either. No consistancy, rain one day, snow the > next, rain again, some sun. What is that? I'll tell you what it is, > sloppy, random, crazy. If mother nature picked any kind of logical > scheme, this whole weather prediction stuff would be a snap and you > wouldn't need a professional like Jian to help you to determine > whether or not it was cold. If Mother Nature is doing all this work, is she getting paid for it? What about Father Nature? Does he just lay on his a$$ while Mother Nature brings home the paycheck(cheque for you foreigners). Christine. ------------------------------ Date: 6 Jan 2002 16:18:52 -0800 From: cfegrl@yahoo.com (Cookie) Subject: Re: his point sugarfly26@aol.com (SugarFly26) wrote in message news:<20020104235320.14200.00002921@mb-cj.aol.com>... > > Wow, this is great! Everyone suddenly knows what's best for Ln! She should make > sure to get on a debate team, but only if she can still squeeze in Reading > Comprehension! Thanks for the great advice, I will rush out to comply. We're all really happy that you're listening. However, while you're busy heading our sage advice, don't forget to also: (1) Just say No to sex and drugs. (There's plenty of both in college.) (2) Never eat yellow snow. (3) Don't tug on Superman's cape. (4) Don't spit in the wind. (5) Don't pull the mask off the old Lone Ranger. (6) Don't mess around with Slim. Doo doo doo doo doo doo do doo doooooooo.... Cookie ------------------------------ Date: 6 Jan 2002 16:26:26 -0800 From: darlene88@yahoo.com (Jen Meyers) Subject: Re: his point > Whoa, whoa, whoa. Buddhism, Confucianism, Taoism, Paganism, nihilism, > existentialism, need I continue? I did have a test today. That wasn't bull. It's on European socialism. I mean, really, what's the point? I'm not European, I don't plan on being European, so who gives a crap if they're socialist? They could be fascist anarchists - that still wouldn't change the fact that I don't own a car. Not that I condone fascism, or any ism for that matter. Isms in my opinion are not good. A person should not believe in an ism - he should believe in himself. I quote John Lennon: "I don't believe in Beatles - I just believe in me". A good point there. Of course, he was the Walrus. I could be the Walrus - I'd still have to bum rides off of people. jen ------------------------------ Date: 6 Jan 2002 16:21:51 -0800 From: cfegrl@yahoo.com (Cookie) Subject: Re: his point mrsfillyjonk@hotmail.com (Richard Butterworth) wrote in message news:<3af38f41.0201060749.384f673f@posting.google.com>... > A feather boa? Now you see I'd have thought that Eric was much more a > lemon yellow crimplene polka dotted matching handbag and accessories > type. God, I love this newsgroup! Where else can a conversation logically segue from world peace to cross-dressing in one post? :-D Cookie ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 00:35:04 GMT From: "Chris K @*_*@" Subject: Re: his point Jen Meyers wrote: > I did have a test today. That wasn't bull. It's on European socialism. > I mean, really, what's the point? I'm not European, I don't plan on > being European, so who gives a crap if they're socialist? They could > be fascist anarchists - that still wouldn't change the fact that I > don't own a car. Not that I condone fascism, or any ism for that > matter. Isms in my opinion are not good. A person should not believe > in an ism - he should believe in himself. I quote John Lennon: "I > don't believe in Beatles - I just believe in me". A good point there. > Of course, he was the Walrus. I could be the Walrus - I'd still have > to bum rides off of people. > > jen Holy Sh*t!!! Jen = Ferris Bueller!!!! And I thought she was one of the students at Degrassi! She still has the hots for Joey Jeremiah, I know it. Christine. ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V6 #6 ******************************************