From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V3 #888 Reply-To: ammf@fruvous.com Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Thursday, October 14 1999 Volume 03 : Number 888 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: Conan [Lynne ] another humongous IWHO interp [Srm9988n@aol.com] Re: [HYPE] Moxy Fruvous Interview Only @ MEANWHILE... [mike jozic ] FREE Download of the New Mp3 Studio for Windows. 6124 [test560@hotmail.c] IWHO video ["Hell Hotel" ] Free Phones Free Activation [cell@nospamhome.com] Re: Murray on Conan [michykith@aol.com (Michykith)] Saw CONAN on the tee-vee! [Lisa Schapiro ] IWHO video/Conan [StarflashJ@aol.com] Re: billy joel was Re: Great a cappella groups ["Jerry Levine/ Madd Hatte] video swapp'n [Paul Baker ] did anybody tape the Victoria show? [Taryn Chase ] Re: Rochester Fruvous ["Wood, Nancy" ] Yea! Radio in Boston [Michele Determan ] Conan Reruns [connacht80@aol.com (Connacht80)] Re: OT:Moxy Fruvous-&Loopy how was TMBG? ["Angela Anuszewski" ] "Sad Girl" on XPN's Leicht Lunch [gingee@my-deja.com] Re: another humongous IWHO interp [LSan497884@aol.com] Re: [HYPE] Moxy Fruvous Interview Only @ MEANWHILE... [Melanie Subject: Re: Conan hmmm, did anyone notice a little "wow, conan" reaction from Jian.. just before the commercial? I wonder if he was "starstruck" or just shocked at the amount of make-up Conan has to wear to look good on TV? :) - -Lynne, off to cali in a week! ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 04:21:49 GMT From: Srm9988n@aol.com Subject: another humongous IWHO interp Genna wrote: You know, I've been mulling over posting my own alternative interpretation of this song for over a month now, ever since ladywench offered hers about a parent/child bond transcending adolescence, illness, and death. So now that Genna's added another beautiful, exceedingly persuasive argument that IWHO is far more than just another sappy romantic-love song, but instead addresses the exquisite pain commitment to another person can cause when life throws cruel hurdles in the way, I guess I'll hop on the bandwagon. Both ladywench's and Genna's views resonate with me, and I'd like to expand on the idea that IWHO can be heard as expressing unselfish, nondemanding love, and the willingness such love inspires in otherwise sane people to undergo inconvenience or hardship in order to soften, or at least share, the blows life visits on someone else who is dearly beloved. I think that like The Drinking Song, IWHO has the potential to be a very personal, unique experience for each person listening to it, perhaps even each time they hear it. I was one of those who was enchanted by it from the first time I heard it (ie, August '98) and to me it was never either a feel-good love song OR an Every Breath You Take-style psycho stalker song. To me, IWHO always has been about the most difficult, yet most transformative part of being in a deep relationship -- of being a "lover," but in the Greek, "agape" sense of idealized, non-possessive, not necessarily sexual love. IWHO speaks of tenacity, and devotion, and fidelity in *any* sort of relationship that is deep enough to evoke a concern for another's needs that overrides one's own. The narrator in IWHO does sound heartbroken, but not so much by his loved one's physical or psychological absence as by that person's pain and/or confusion in a time of unspecified crisis. To me, the narrator voices not selfish clinging, but a profound desire to enhance the other person's well-being, or minimize their unease, even, if necessary, at the expense of his own ease. Whether that's dysfunctional or not I'll leave up to the psychologists. ;) All I know is, it rings true enough with me. There have been times I've put this song on repeat -- or rewound a live-show tape over and over (mmmmmm, backing harmonies) -- because, while what IWHO is evoking for me that day may be breaking *my* heart, it at just those times that I find it most comforting. Jian has written a song in which all the dark feelings of fear and ineffectuality and loss (or anticipated loss) are expressed so acutely -- and then *transcended* by dogged persistence and dedication and avowal of sheer will. It is no coincidence that the song's not called just "I'll Hold On", but "I *WILL* Hold On" -- this lyric, whatever else it is, is a stubborn, obstinate, bullheaded leap of faith. The progression of tenses in the refrain, and the shifting of moods expressed in the increasing seriousness of the intentions in each verse, reveal the narrator's developing awareness of the pain in life, and his struggle to come to terms with how the most cherished, protected relationships are the ones most affected by that pain. We don't know what the trouble is in the relationship, and it is entirely possible that it originated entirely outside the relationship. An illness, an independent acquaintance, a legal matter -- we don't know, and it could be anything at all. (Of course, it *could* simply be that the other person just can't abide the narrator. ;) ) Regardless, the reality the narrator struggles with is that when people care for each other enough that one's trouble grieves the other too, that pain becomes an inextricable part of, and defining factor in, their relationship. Whether he wants it to be or not. In the first verse and a half, the relationship seems new, and for the most part the narrator is in a happy, even naive frame of mind. The feelings he voices, while sweet and caring, are on a fairly sanguine, reassuring, simplistic level. Paraphrased: "I'm here for you, always; I won't let you down when things are bad; I'll make a bad pun to put a smile on your face." There's not necessarily the intimacy yet that leads to revealing personal details, but he can feel it developing. He's idealistic in his outlook, feels safe sharing anything with this other person, and he believes that person is starting to feel the same way -- so there won't be any secrets, ever. For him, in his idealistic view, this relationship exists in a sacred space, unpolluted by the negative factors that may affect the rest of their lives. Not only does he seem to think it's strong enough to fend off that pollution, but also that it might be a positive influence on other areas that concern them. The first hint of all being less-than-sunshine-and-roses comes in the last two lines of the second verse: "I'll hold the truth if you must lie I'll hold out choice 'till you know what to do" But the problem seems vague, its scope not fully understood or admitted. by the narrator. He is aware that something is troubling his loved one, something this person needs to work out, that is causing indecision and perhaps lying. But it doesn't really seem to impact on the confidence the narrator has in the two of them, or on his view of their relationship. As long as they share mutual trust and faith in each other, he believes there is nothing so bad that they can't deal with it together. He adopts a persuasive tone: "so I will hold on and if that's not what you're used to then I may refuse to hold off Well maybe if that's not what you're used to how can I refuse you?" In saying "Yeah, you've seen other things go bad, but this is different, this is special," he really is trying to persuade the other person of his conviction that this relationship transcends the ordinary, the mundane, the troubles they each have to deal with "outside". This is the article of faith the narrator holds most high -- everything he believes about what the relationship *can* be. And this is what I interpret him as refusing to hold off -- he's not holding his cards close here; he wants to share that kind of relationship, and wants to let the other person know how very much they mean to him -- no matter what troubles they face, no matter what difficulties they might pose. In the third verse, he at first keeps a light, affectionate, considerate tone, but after two lines he has to cut to the heart of the matter: "I'll hold the pain 'til it is gone and i'll hold my ground when people stop and stare" The "real world" seems to be intruding on the relationship -- there is pain, whether physical or mental, and there is anguish because of the pain, and the possibility of others' also being aware that the crisis, whatever it is, is unfolding. But the narrator wears his faith in the relationship like a shield -- or an amulet. It is the source of his strength at a difficult time, and he tries to share that strength with the other person as well, reminding them (or insisting to them): "you know that it's true, when I've held you there are no secrets you must believe it." Reading between the lines, I hear: "Be strong. Yes there are problems, but you've got me. I've got you. That's all you (we) need to get through this. Don't doubt, don't fear -- that's the only thing that can really harm you." In the last verse, he comes to terms with the reality that the crisis has profoundly affected the relationship. He's hurting -- but he still has faith in the relationship's goodness, if not his earlier, perhaps-naive belief that its power is limitless. In that faith, he offers his own being: "i'll hold the beating of my heart i'll hold my breath if you will tell me to i'll hold the hope that we won't part and i'll hold off death so I can live with you" In these words I don't hear "If I can't have you, I'll die" or anything obsessive or suicidal, but simply: "You are so important to me. If my doing *anything* could mitigate this trouble, know I'll do it. In a heartbeat. But I don't know *what* to do, so all I can offer you is my willingness -- the knowledge no matter how alone you feel, I'm always here for you, to do whatever you need." "you knew it was true, when I held you there were no secrets i believed it" Here again he tries to persuade the other person of the power this relationship can possess. There has been a setback, and with that setback now there is distance -- secrets. But he knows it doesn't have to be that way. And so he emphasizes that he's not giving up, not walking away, not holding off or holding back, not denying something he values just because trouble has found it. His faith is unbroken -- and so, still, despite the pain he's known, he can refuse that other person nothing. In a way, what he vows is not so very different from: I will love and honor you For better or for worse For richer or for poorer In sickness and in health Until death us do part. But throughout the song the narrator seems to pledge this unilaterally. I get the impression that in the beginning, naive and idealistic, he hopes reciprocation eventually will follow, but he doesn't demand or coerce it, doesn't adjust his level of commitment or action to the other person's reciprocal ability. And in the end, I don't think he expects the other to be able to reciprocate. Yet still he can honor himself by declaring the truth of his feelings, and honor his loved one by not insisting they be, do, or feel anything in return. And to me, that expresses a much higher, more liberated, and unconditional love. - -- Lori ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 05:16:04 GMT From: mike jozic Subject: Re: [HYPE] Moxy Fruvous Interview Only @ MEANWHILE... Raenfaerie@aol.com wrote: > > My newsfeed is awful and although I've received numerous responses to the > Interview post, i don't have the original post and thus can't read the > website/whatever. Would someone mind reposting or emailing me with the > address? Thanks ever so much. > peace, In case nobody has answered your call, the address is http://www.meanwhile.net. I hope you enjoy the interview and if you really dig what you read, I'd love to hear about it. :) Thanks for the interest! mike jozic - --- MEANWHILE... The Web's Snappiest E'Zine! http://www.meanwhile.net ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 05:33:47 GMT From: "Cameron Ross" Subject: Re: Murray on Conan > - -this is Sandy from Ohio delurking briefly to mention an amusing coincidence > last night- I was killing time until Conan by flipping through channels and > there, on the sci-fi channel was Friday the 13th, the series. Guess which > episode they were playing? I've noticed that seems to happen... the universe always seems to Converge Früheads and Früvous in odd ways... I mean, you'd expect Früheads at concerts, but to tune in to that episode... Freaky man... It's like the Double Repeat Phenominon... If you watch a TV show only twice in your life, it will be the same episode both times - Life101 - Should really stop Philiosophizing at 1:25 at night "Can't shake the devil's hand and say you're only kidding" -They Might Be Giants -=( http://www.mental.nu/~life101 | ICQ#: 39307347 )=- ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 06:59:39 GMT From: test560@hotmail.com Subject: FREE Download of the New Mp3 Studio for Windows. 6124 Download Mp3 Studio for FREE! Go to: http://tucows.inetplus.net/adnload/dlmusicamp95.html or click here: Mp3 Studio Download MusicAmp Mp3 Studio is not just another Mp3 Player, but a complete studio that allows you to Play Mp3, Create Mp3 Cds, Decode, Studio Mix with 24 Band Equalizer, Playlist Creator, ID3 Tag Editor, Skin Support and much more. (See Screen Shot) Why settle for a Mp3 Player when you can have a complete Mp3 Studio with the New MusicAmp sound? Tucows gave this Studio 4 Stars out of 5 Stars. Go to: http://tucows.inetplus.net/adnload/dlmusicamp95.html or click here: Mp3 Studio Download Note: This newsgroup post was not posted by Tucows, but a major lover of the Mp3 Studio. You have to check it out. ------------------------------ Date: 14 Oct 1999 10:35:45 GMT From: "Hell Hotel" Subject: IWHO video Hail FruHeads Tall and Small. I hear that the IWHO video is now playing on canadian tv....hmm. Don't think there's much chance of it making it's way onto MTV or VH1. So, would anyone be so kind as to be willing to tape it for me? I can send ya a blank tape. if you can help please let me know. Thanks Eric Jackson P.S. oh and i did tape the conan appearance so if you want that in exchange for the video thats cool here. well, thanks. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 10:47:45 GMT From: cell@nospamhome.com Subject: Free Phones Free Activation Follow the cellstar link below for the free phones. No reserve on any items. Listing starts at $0.50 For Nextel network phones (i1000, i1000+,i600,i500+,i370): http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewListedItems&userid=cyclonebsn http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewListedItems&userid=cellstar qljcfbebjnymdmwolcoknelkusurnkquimfzizlffdwruvrsptxuxkjqzkbzkhkcuiuv ------------------------------ Date: 14 Oct 1999 11:14:45 GMT From: michykith@aol.com (Michykith) Subject: Re: Murray on Conan >>What? was that an ordinary light blue shirt? > >Hey, this is Murray we're talking about here. Nothing he wears is ever >ordinary! > > Not at all! "Lizzie's" shirt is polyester, and very unique if you get up close to it. (Maybe I should let her defend it herself? :) It's got a weird pattern woven into the shirt dealy goin' on. ~Joni (fnjoni@fruhead.com) * * * * "I tried to frame my own self-portrait into a three minute one act play, but I'm a carnival of voices, it's hard to pin me down that way." ellis paul ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 07:37:31 -0400 From: Lisa Schapiro Subject: Saw CONAN on the tee-vee! Hey, Fruheads! *blip* - here I reappear! So, a quick review from someone who didn't have the brain in her head to try to get tickets to Conan even though she lives within 5 hours of NYC. (Maybe the doctors took my brain out!) Here was the thought process: Fruvous on Conan? Great! I can watch it on the tee-vee! (It occurred to me only much, much later, in my thesis-addled state, that I could've gotten tickets. Sure, I could've waited in line this morning, but I didn't even think about it 'cause I'd have to miss work. Wow, I'm such an idiot!). ANYWAY, after some major anxiety about the dagburned baseball game, I put on the VCR, snoozed through Leno (sorry, Leno) and then tuned in for Conan. I just knew you guys who did make it to the show would cheer loudly and with gusto -- and I was right. I can't tell you how psyched I was when Fruvous beat out David Boreanaz in the cheering department! When the musical segment FINALLY came, my fiance and I danced. Well, let me rephrase -- he had an enthusiastic look on his face out of character for someone who couldn't sleep, and I bounced emphatically up and down on the couch, wrapped in a blanket. So it was almost like dancing. Of course, they were excellent. I was so glad they chose to sing "Splatter, Splatter", which is one of my favorites on Thornhill. It's so fast, full of harmony, and well, full of Mike, which I always like. ;-) They looked great, they sounded terrific, and most importantly, they were the same excellent Fruvous we all know and love. Well, I guess it's bed time now... Lisa Schapiro (...getting REALLY excited to see them in Somerville this November, for the first time since my surgery... since May, in fact!!! WOOO HOOOOOOO!!!!) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 12:06:14 GMT From: StarflashJ@aol.com Subject: IWHO video/Conan I would also be willing to trade a copy of Conan for the IWHO video.. if there is anyone who needs it.. plus for anyone else I am pretty sure I will be able to copy Conan for a blank+ postage! Just working out where I am getting the second VCR from!! ~*Jen*~ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 23:37:42 -0400 From: "Jerry Levine/ Madd Hatter" Subject: Re: billy joel was Re: Great a cappella groups I have the russian Album...KOHEPT I think. - -- - ------------------------------------------ Jerry Levine "A satisfied virgin is a virgin no longer." -- Anon. jlevine@wam.umd.edu maddhatter@earthling.net http://maddhatter.cjb.net Genna wrote in message news:19991013221451.12609.00000933@ng-fp1.aol.com... | >everyone likes billy joel...and i'm in a no caps mood...i love billy | >joel...have almost every album...and i can sing along with every song | >perfectly! | | he's wonderful. I do know all the words to all of his songs. He's a wonderful | artist. My favorate album is the one he recorded live in Russia (i wont even | attempt to spell it here). I love his intro on that album to allentown. | | I also love how he sings about LI places. I love knowing the beaches hes | talking about and the harbors....it makes me feel special. | | about the a cappella group. It was better. you have to hear it. My brother | has an MP3 version of it. If i could find a link for it I'll post it. | | solem, | Genna | ^^^^^^^^^ | | And my unspeakable wife, Queen shmendrick (Don't mention shmendrick ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 08:36:57 -0400 From: Paul Baker Subject: video swapp'n Hi all! Much to my surprise, I managed to tape the Conan appearance (even with the baseball game going over it's allotted time)... it was great! Fave part -- Dave's little shuffle dance in the beginning during his accordion riff! Dave's da man! Out of all of the lads... he looked the most relaxed. Anyhoo-- I'd like to get the IWHO video, so if anyone's interested in a trade... let me know. I have the whole Conan show, or just the Fru segment... your choice. Oh... by the way.... I have the capability to capture the segment digitally and post it on the web somewhere if that's cool to do and/or if someone can point me in a direction to where I might find enough server space to hold it... ;) Paul ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 13:31:03 GMT From: Taryn Chase Subject: did anybody tape the Victoria show? if you did, could i pleasepleasepleasepleaseplease get a dub from you? i'd be forever grateful. i absolutely *must* hear the encore: < Encore: Sunrise (with Tory)> write to taryn@fruhead.com or frumessage me if you can help. thanks! ~taryn ps and all the better if it's got Tory's opening set... ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 13:55:22 GMT From: "Wood, Nancy" Subject: Re: Rochester Fruvous Has anyone (in Rochester) seen today's D&C weekend section? Here's the blurb on page 15: MOXY FRUVOUS, NOV. 24, HARRO EAST The irreverent and extraordinarily talented band Moxy Fruvous, one of Rochester's favorite Canadian imports, returns for a Nov. 24 show at the Harro East ballroom, 155 Chestnut Street. Tickets for the 8pm performance are $15 ($20 day of the show) and go on sale at noon Saturday at Record Archive, Lakeshore Record Exchange, Fantastic Records, Hardpack Board Gear, DIScover shop, and Ticketmaster. Nancy ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 10:20:37 -0400 From: Michele Determan Subject: Yea! Radio in Boston Just now, after the River 92.5 in Boston played my request for "Splatter, Splatter", the DJ said: "that, of course was Moxy Fruvous. Not a day goes by that we don't get a request for Moxy Fruvous". Then she talked a bit about them and gave their next local concert date at the Somerville Theater on Nov 21st (I can't wait!). So the campaign for more radio air time seems be having an effect! Tired from staying up late last night for Conan (must be getting old)... - Michele ------------------------------ Date: 14 Oct 1999 14:37:41 GMT From: connacht80@aol.com (Connacht80) Subject: Conan Reruns In case any of you were like me and programmed their VCR to tape Conan Tuesday morning instead of Wednesday morning there is yet another chance. Yes, I can still see the greatest night on TV - Moxy Fruvous and David Boreanaz. Conan repeats a week after the initial airing at 3:30 am here in Philadelphia, so last Tuesday's show should be on again 10/19 at 3:30 (or rather 10/20 at 3:30). I'm not 100% sure about the 3:30, but you can check the TV Guide. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 11:48:53 -0400 From: "Angela Anuszewski" Subject: Re: OT:Moxy Fruvous-&Loopy how was TMBG? (Cross-posted for your viewing displeasure) Man, you think Al-Gals are bad? Wait until you've met a true Fruhead! The current CD is Thornhill, and Splatter^2 is a real treat. Tickets go on sale Friday for a show here in Rochester, NY. I can't wait! I'm just hoping that I can make some of the fruheads into Al-Men and Al-gals... they've managed to turn this Al-gal into a Fruhead! Angela PISCOPINTO wrote in message news:19991012193640.12600.00000311@ng-fp1.aol.com... > For anybody that's interested in checking out AL acquantances Moxy Fruvous, > they're playing on Conan O'Brien's show tonight- as far as I know they'll be > performing a song called "Splatter Splatter" from their current CD. They're > very fun and hyper, I've been seeing them live for 5 years and they're still > one of my very favorite live bands... if I remember correctly they will be > using an accordion on that tune:) > > And YEAH LOOPY how WAS that They Might Be Giants show??? SPILL IT!!!!! > > Angel ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 16:38:14 GMT From: firedancer Subject: conan o'brien to whom it may concern (i.e. technologically challenged, sleepy heads, serial killers, etc): for reasons no other than lack of trust in my ability to properly program a vcr, i managed to brave the sleeper wiping wee hours of the morning to tape the show. for those of you who weren't able to perform such an amazing feat, i would be glad to make you a copy! (as soon as i catch up on sleep) *yawn* kristen firedancer@postmark.net ======================================================= "those who hear not the music think the dancers mad..." ======================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 16:47:00 GMT From: gingee@my-deja.com Subject: "Sad Girl" on XPN's Leicht Lunch Today's Leicht ("light")Lunch theme: "Beauty's Only Skin Deep", inspired by the current issue of People Mag featuring skinny models/actresses and the continuing fixation on being thin. My suggestion of "Sad Girl" started off the set! The song's topic of heroine chic (not "sheik" as recently spelled in the "Meanwhile" e-zine interview) and how the influence of the media and fashion fuels girls' and women's obsessions about body image is a perfect fit. (I think there's a pun in there, but certainly not intended). Eat a healthy lunch! Cheers! gingee Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 16:46:19 GMT From: LSan497884@aol.com Subject: Re: another humongous IWHO interp In a message dated 10/14/99 1:08:31 AM Central Daylight Time, Srm9988n@aol.com writes: > You know, I've been mulling over posting my own alternative > interpretation of this song for over a month now, ever since > ladywench offered hers about a parent/child bond transcending > adolescence, illness, and death. So now that Genna's added > another beautiful, exceedingly persuasive argument that IWHO is > far more than just another sappy romantic-love song, but instead > addresses the exquisite pain commitment to another person can > cause when life throws cruel hurdles in the way, I guess I'll hop on > the bandwagon. > > Both ladywench's and Genna's views resonate with me, and I'd like > to expand on the idea that IWHO can be heard as expressing > unselfish, nondemanding love, and the willingness such love inspires > in otherwise sane people to undergo inconvenience or hardship in > order to soften, or at least share, the blows life visits on someone > else who is dearly beloved. I, too, have held off on my interpretation of this song. Now I know why. Lori has, again, captured so many of my own thoughts that I don't need to do it myself! I really appreciate the scope and number of interpretations that can be given to this song. From the first time I heard it, it has been one of my favorites. (Not quite up there with Gulf War Song, but very close!) The first time I heard in on West Coast Live, it sounded like a lovely love song to me, and that interpretation may be the one most people take from it, and that's fine. It's a fine song, just given that. However, there is so much more underlying that, and I'm glad to hear other peoples' interps because it has helped me to confirm some of my own feelings. I listened to it again from the perspective of a parent, and that really was a wonderful aspect I hadn't considered. Then I got to thinking about it in any relationship that may be encountering some difficulties, from setbacks in the romantic realm, to dealing with difficulties within a marriage, to dealing with a loved one with a disabling condition or one who develops one (e.g. my friend whose husband has cancer). One of the really wonderful things about music (and I'm talking about any kind--symphonic, jazz, instrumental, lyrical, etc) is that it can be interpreted by the listener, any listener, in a way that is meaningful for that person. We are all at different places in our lives with different experiences and different sets of circumstances. So if a song "speaks" to a variety of people in a myriad of different ways, that piece of music becomes something transcendent. And that potential is there with any piece of music composed or written. To me, that is just mind-boggling, almost a miraculous thing. Okay, I'm getting sappy here, but I just couldn't resist. I'll go back to reading, but no guarantees you won't hear from me again! *Lois (Fogeyfru) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 17:23:17 GMT From: Melanie Subject: Re: [HYPE] Moxy Fruvous Interview Only @ MEANWHILE... mike jozic wrote >>I hope you enjoy the interview and if you really dig what you read, I'd love to hear about it. :)<< As one who found it and read it, just wanted to say that I really enjoyed it. But I acknowledge being a news junkie when it comes to Moxy Fruvous. I particularly love reading articles. Good job, Mike. Looking forward to part II. melanie ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V3 #888 ********************************************