From: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org (alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest) To: ammf-digest@smoe.org Subject: alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V1 #666 Reply-To: ammf@smoe.org Sender: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ammf-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest Friday, September 25 1998 Volume 01 : Number 666 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: fruvous in bars [vika@ibm.net (Vika Zafrin)] Re: A couple of questions [Chad Schrock ] Re: A couple of questions [rdfinch@mindspring.com (Roxanne D. Finch)] Re: No, The Fish Are Alright: Expedition '98, Part 3 (LONG) [kdsinthhal@a] Re: NYC/LI to Northampton - Share a Ride? [fruwench@aol.com (FruWench)] Re: That article/Empty newsgroup [zardsnod@aol.com (ZardSnod)] Re: That article/Empty newsgroup [zardsnod@aol.com (ZardSnod)] Re: A Better Frvous article [zardsnod@aol.com (ZardSnod)] Re: San Francisco show? [nnicole1@my-dejanews.com] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 01:26:37 GMT From: vika@ibm.net (Vika Zafrin) Subject: Re: fruvous in bars On Thu, 24 Sep 1998 05:06:53 GMT, the following words of wisdom were uttered by "Aye, who's asking whom?" : > Many fans are underage, and many Fruvous fans are tee-totallers or >generally opposed to drunken culture. *giggle* Why is it that my brain is coming up with the mental picture of a slowly swaying, almost dancing (stumbling?) yeast in a Petri dish? :D Rearding bars... one thing is, there are bars and then there are bars. That OTHER kind of bars is *generally* called a pub, and there are plenty nifty ones that I've been to, and that I'd love to see Fruvous play in (unfortunately, all the examples I can think of right now are kinda small for Fruvous). But my point is (you have a *point*, Vika?! Woo!), not all bars have loud obnoxious drunks, and you don't have to be in a bar to be near a loud obnoxious drunk... Iron Horse in December, anyone? (Or was that Met Cafe that some guy was yelling "Play the f***ing Drinking Song!!" in?) Vika Zafrin vika@ibm.net Vika_Zafrin@Brown.edu "You _will_ observe my pouting!" - ChrisO ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 21:33:09 -0400 From: Chad Schrock Subject: Re: A couple of questions Chad Maloney wrote: > Chad Schrock wrote: > > > > How tall is tall Chad? > > I'm 6'6" (and have been since 6th grade - ponder that for a > second. I was also 5' tall in kindergarten). Great googly-moogly! I'm only 6-2. I'll stick with the lower-case c. :) - -- chad@ radix.net ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 01:48:57 GMT From: rdfinch@mindspring.com (Roxanne D. Finch) Subject: Re: A couple of questions In article <360A4AF9.1631283@rosevc.rose-hulman.edu>, Chad Maloney wrote: >Chad Schrock wrote: >> >> How tall is tall Chad? > >I'm 6'6" (and have been since 6th grade - ponder that for a second. I was >also 5' tall in kindergarten). > > - Chad Okay, I'm 26 and 5' tall! Oddly enough I dated a guy who was 6'10" once...boy were we a funny looking sight! rox ------------------------------ Date: 25 Sep 1998 02:24:09 GMT From: kdsinthhal@aol.com.krunk (KdsInThHal) Subject: Re: No, The Fish Are Alright: Expedition '98, Part 3 (LONG) > >As for Peter Mansbridge and Cynthia Dale... very high-level stuff here. >They >are very private about the relationship, and Mansbridge's breakup with his > >ex-wife was the stuff of soap-operas. hehe...i miss Newsroom. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. *sarah linnellgirl@tmbg.org http://members.aol.com/kdsinthhal " 'demographic'.. that's my courtney love word." --chris murphy of sloan ------------------------------ Date: 25 Sep 1998 03:19:31 GMT From: fruwench@aol.com (FruWench) Subject: Re: NYC/LI to Northampton - Share a Ride? We will be bringin a crew up from Delaware on Friday afternoon, probably about the same time. Wanna meet and caravan? Or look for us. ladywench FruSpace - We came, we saw, we slept on the floor . . . ------------------------------ Date: 25 Sep 1998 03:29:33 GMT From: zardsnod@aol.com (ZardSnod) Subject: Re: That article/Empty newsgroup Hugo wrote: >Blame it on camp, I dress up way too often at camp. or would that be "I dress up camp way too often"?! ;-) - -Zard "www.washme.com" - seen on the back window of a filthy station wagon, heading to Owen Sound, ON ------------------------------ Date: 25 Sep 1998 03:30:55 GMT From: zardsnod@aol.com (ZardSnod) Subject: Re: That article/Empty newsgroup chad wrote (and Nate): >> >> I hope I'm not going to be the only un-costumed one.... >> :( > >Naaah. > >There are several of us that will be there as our glorious selves. Costumes optional but encouraged! I wanna go as a Chad or a chad!! Glasses and tall ?? - -Zard "www.washme.com" - seen on the back window of a filthy station wagon, heading to Owen Sound, ON ------------------------------ Date: 25 Sep 1998 03:27:29 GMT From: zardsnod@aol.com (ZardSnod) Subject: Re: A Better Frvous article The actual writer of the SEE article (great article, btw!) wrote: <> Um,... they actually were *reviewed* in People mag. when You Will Go To the Moon was released. So they don't get full page spreads like BNL just did - it was still People mag. exposure! (if that's something to hold proudly to...) Anyone remember which issue it was? - -Zard "www.washme.com" - seen on the back window of a filthy station wagon, heading to Owen Sound, ON ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 03:21:15 GMT From: nnicole1@my-dejanews.com Subject: Re: San Francisco show? In article <360A484A.6A3955AA@rosevc.rose-hulman.edu>, Chad Maloney wrote: > ana.ng@tmbg.org wrote: My last > > address change didn't go through.) > Nicole, I'd just re-sign up on the mailist list again at your next show. > That'll get you mail in two places (or the current resident mail in the > old place, spreading the word in a weird way =) ). Is taken care of, thanks. Three cheers for Jude, who verily goes above and beyond the call of duty! - --nicole twn who assures people that Chad is, in fact, exceedingly tall. You know, speaking of this whole Chad/chad thing, has anyone considered the following? In dealing with a [Cc]had, three possibilities emerge: 1) Each [Cc]had is himself. 2) They are the same person. 3) They are each other. Odds are therefore 2 in 3 that the [Cc]had you're dealing with is not the one you think! Be wary, everyone. Demand ID. I'm pretty sure there's a bad science-fiction story in here somewhere... - -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum ------------------------------ End of alt.music.moxy-fruvous digest V1 #666 ********************************************