From: owner-50s60s70s-digest@smoe.org (50s60s70s-digest) To: 50s60s70s-digest@smoe.org Subject: 50s60s70s-digest V1 #24 Reply-To: 50s60s70s@smoe.org Sender: owner-50s60s70s-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-50s60s70s-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk 50s60s70s-digest Sunday, June 2 2002 Volume 01 : Number 024 * If you ever wish to unsubscribe from this digest, send an email to * 50s60s70s-digest-request@smoe.org with ONLY the word * unsubscribe in the BODY of the email * . * PLEASE :) when you reply to this digest to send a post TO the list, * change the subject to reflect what your post is about. A subject * of Re: 50s60s70s-digest V1 #xxx or the like gives fellow list readers * no clue as to what your message is about. Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: R&R: The early Rolling Stones - remastered [Mike Connell Subject: Re: R&R: The early Rolling Stones - remastered Speaking of the Rolling Bones, I wonder if any of you have strong feelings in regards to the issue of "Enough! It's time to retire Mick & gang!" versus "Keep on rockin' guys!"? I myself don't give a *major* hoot either way...but if the show has power and energy, fine...play on. Don't know how Mick's voice is these days, he's 59, but as long as he isn't ripping off the ticket buyers and just sing-speaks the songs rather than true singing (ala Sinatra in his latter years) and can still at least sing, play on :-) I did chuckle though when the one reporter at the tour announcement in NYC asked Mick (paraphrasing) "what about when you said in the 1960s that you'd hope someone would shoot you if you were still singing "Satisfaction" when you are 40?" Mike ------------------------------ End of 50s60s70s-digest V1 #24 ******************************